MHB Multiplication of Fractions (Destiny C Sweet's Question on Facebook)

AI Thread Summary
To solve the multiplication of mixed numbers \(4\frac{3}{4}\) and \(9\frac{4}{8}\), first convert them to improper fractions: \(4\frac{3}{4} = \frac{19}{4}\) and \(9\frac{4}{8} = 9\frac{1}{2} = \frac{19}{2}\). Multiply the improper fractions to get \(\frac{19}{4} \times \frac{19}{2} = \frac{361}{8}\). Finally, convert the improper fraction \(\frac{361}{8}\) back to a mixed number, resulting in \(45\frac{1}{8}\). This method effectively demonstrates the steps for multiplying mixed numbers and simplifying the result.
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Destiny C Sweet on Facebook writes:

Can someone take a look at this mixed number multiplication problem below... and explain to me how they got this answer? When you work the problem out find the product and reduce to the lowest terms...

\[4\frac{3}{4}\times 9\frac{4}{8}=45\frac{1}{8}\]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sudharaka said:
Destiny C Sweet on Facebook writes:

Can someone take a look at this mixed number multiplication problem below... and explain to me how they got this answer? When you work the problem out find the product and reduce to the lowest terms...

\[4\frac{3}{4}\times 9\frac{4}{8}=45\frac{1}{8}\]

Hi Destiny, :)

First we convert the mixed fractions into improper fractions and then do the multiplication. Finally we convert the resulting improper fraction into a mixed fraction. For learn how to convert mixed fractions into improper fractions you might find >>this<< helpful.

\begin{eqnarray}

4\frac{3}{4}\times 9\frac{4}{8}&=&4\frac{3}{4}\times 9\frac{1}{2}\\

&=&\frac{19}{4}\times\frac{19}{2}\\

&=&\frac{361}{8}\\

&=&45\frac{1}{8}

\end{eqnarray}
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
992
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top