Multiplication of Operators in Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Penny57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
Penny57
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Operators can also be multiplied just like matrices. Physically, this represents applying two operations in succession. To compute in the abstract setting, we just need the rule ⟨i|j⟩ = δij .

(d) Compute the operator product of |1⟩⟨1| and |1⟩⟨1| + |2⟩⟨2|.
(e) Compute the operator product of |1⟩⟨2| + |2⟩⟨1| and |2⟩⟨2|.
Relevant Equations
O = O[SUB]ij[/SUB] |i⟩⟨j| = O[SUB]11[/SUB] * |1⟩⟨1| + O[SUB]12[/SUB] * |1⟩⟨2| + O[SUB]21[/SUB]|2⟩⟨1| + O[SUB]22[/SUB]|2⟩⟨2|.
For the first part of the problem, I managed to form this matrix;

<1|O|1><1|O|2>
<2|O|1><2|O|2>

=
10
00

However, that was because I was following this image;

MUuW2cj.png


I'm not entirely sure how this was obtained, and I'm not really sure what to do to continue forward with part e. I apologize for my lack of knowledge - I've attempted to search for any youtube videos to help and go through online textbooks, but I'm unable to find what I am looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you investigate it with the expression of the states
<br /> |1&gt;=<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 \\<br /> 0 \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />
<br /> |2&gt;=<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />
 
Last edited:
penny_ss said:
To compute in the abstract setting, we just need the rule ⟨i|j⟩ = δij .
For example, the operator ##| 2 \rangle \langle 1|## multiplied by the operator ##| 1 \rangle \langle 1|## would be $$| 2 \rangle \langle 1| \cdot | 1 \rangle \langle 1| = | 2 \rangle \langle 1|| 1 \rangle \langle 1| = | 2 \rangle \langle 1| 1 \rangle \langle 1|$$ The middle part ##\langle 1| 1 \rangle## of the expression on the far right can be evaluated using the rule ##\langle i| j \rangle = \delta_{ij}##.
 
Thank you so much for the help! I've managed to work through it with the advice given. I forgot to account for the expression of the states - once I did, the problem became much easier. Thank you for the help! And that rule makes a lot more sense now. Thank you again!
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top