Multivariable calculus problem involving partial derivatives along a surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a multivariable calculus problem involving partial derivatives and directional derivatives. The user calculated the partial derivatives at the point (-3, 4) as 3/125 for x and -4/125 for y. They derived the directional derivative formula and found a local maximum at b = -4/5, leading to the unit vector (0.6, -0.8, 0) for maximum increase. The conversation emphasizes the importance of the gradient in determining the direction of maximum increase for a function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts, specifically partial derivatives.
  • Familiarity with directional derivatives and unit vectors.
  • Knowledge of gradient vectors and their significance in optimization.
  • Ability to perform calculus operations such as differentiation and solving equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gradient vectors in multivariable calculus.
  • Learn how to compute directional derivatives using unit vectors.
  • Explore optimization techniques in multivariable functions.
  • Review examples of applying partial derivatives in real-world scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying multivariable calculus, as well as professionals in fields requiring optimization and analysis of functions.

sss1
Messages
50
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Image
Relevant Equations
NA
I just wanted to know if my solution to part (b) is correct. Here's what I did:
I took the partial derivative with respect to x and y, which gave me
{font:{family:Arial,color:#000000,size:11},aid:null,backgroundColor:#ffffff,id:11,code:$$\\frac{-x}{\\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\\right)^{3/2}},\\,\\frac{-y}{\\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\\right)^{3/2}}$$,type:$$,ts:1695899323324,cs:mLppUJ1pren6kF2+GAN3Fw==,size:{width:192,height:40}}
respectively.
Then I computed the partial derivatives at (-3,4) which gave me 3/125 for partial derivative wrt x and -4/125 for partial derivative wrt y
Then since directional derivative requires a direction, I just chose an arbitrary one, uhat=(a,b)
since u is a unit vector that means sqrt(a^2+b^2)=1, or a^2+b^2=1.
I then solved for a, which is the plus minus of sqrt(1-b^2).

I just chose to use the positive answer here instead.
So the directional derivative is 3sqrt(1-b^2)/125-4b/125
To maximise this I took the derivative, which is -3b/125sqrt(1-b^2)-4/125
I set it to 0 and solved for b, which gave me -4/5.
So there is a local maximum for the directional derivative at b=-4/5 (I evaluated the second derivative and it was positive).
So that means on both sides of b=-4/5 the directional derivative decreases.
Subsituting b=-0.8 into my formula for a, a=sqrt(1-b^2), gives me a=0.6
So the directional derivative should be a maximum in the direction given by the unit vector (0.6, -0.8, 0) with magnitude 0.6(3/125)-0.8(-4/125) which is 0.04?

Although I didn't try the negative answer for a, a=-sqrt(1-b^2), I believe that this will yield a smaller answer because if a is negative, then a negative number times a positive number (3/125) will decrease the answer overall? Is my logic correct?
Screen Shot 2023-09-28 at 20.43.41.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The gradient of a function evaluated at a point tells you the direction in which the function increases most rapidly at that point. This would give you the answer more quickly.
 
PeroK said:
The gradient of a function evaluated at a point tells you the direction in which the function increases most rapidly at that point. This would give you the answer more quickly.
Can you explain how to do it using this method?
 
sss1 said:
Can you explain how to do it using this method?
You could have just plugged ##x = -3, y = 4## into the derivative you calculated.
 
PeroK said:
You could have just plugged ##x = -3, y = 4## into the derivative you calculated.
derivative as in df/dt?
 
sss1 said:
derivative as in df/dt?
Look up what gradient means for a multi-variable function.
 
PeroK said:
Look up what gradient means for a multi-variable function.
f_x(x,y)i+f_y(x,y)j? I plugged in (-3,4) and it gave me (3/125, -4/125)
 
sss1 said:
f_x(x,y)i+f_y(x,y)j? I plugged in (-3,4) and it gave me (3/125, -4/125)
But isn't that the gradient at (-3,4)? How is that the direction f increases most rapidly?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K