My Dehumidifier Hygrometer Differs From Handheld by 10% on RH....OK?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dehumidifier
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the discrepancies in relative humidity (RH) readings between a dehumidifier and a handheld hygrometer, exploring the accuracy and reliability of these devices. Participants consider various factors affecting measurements, including device calibration, age, and environmental conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note a significant difference in RH readings (49% vs. 39%) and question whether both devices could be accurate within a margin of error.
  • There is a suggestion that the accuracy of inexpensive hygrometers is questionable, with one participant stating that measurements are "more about magic than accuracy."
  • Participants discuss the potential for a third hygrometer to average the readings, though this approach is met with skepticism regarding the reliability of such devices.
  • One participant emphasizes that the operating principles of hygrometers can vary, mentioning that some use mechanical linkages while others utilize engineered materials for better accuracy.
  • Age and calibration of hygrometers are mentioned as factors that could affect accuracy over time.
  • Some participants express interest in the relationship between RH levels and mold growth, noting that temperature may play a more critical role than RH alone.
  • There are inquiries about the published accuracy of specific hygrometer models, with references to devices that claim better precision.
  • Discussions include the impact of holding a handheld hygrometer in warm hands on its reading.
  • Participants share personal experiences with varying readings from multiple hygrometers placed in the same environment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the accuracy of the devices discussed. Multiple competing views remain regarding the reliability of inexpensive hygrometers and the factors influencing their readings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific calibration data for the devices mentioned, the potential influence of environmental conditions on readings, and the variability in accuracy based on device age and technology.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals concerned with humidity control in environments prone to mold growth, as well as those evaluating the reliability of inexpensive hygrometers for personal or professional use.

kyphysics
Messages
685
Reaction score
445
The relative humidity readings are:

49% dehu
39% handheld

That's when they are placed side-by-side in the same area. Could both be roughly accurate with a small margin of error or could one (or both) just be wildly off?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
kyphysics said:
The relative humidity readings are:

49% dehu
39% handheld

That's when they are placed side-by-side in the same area. Could both be roughly accurate with a small margin of error or could one (or both) just be wildly off?
Yes. All of those are possibilities. How would you expect us to know?
 
DaveE said:
Yes. All of those are possibilities. How would you expect us to know?
Psychic abilities. :smile: Maybe I should have specified that I'm just curious too how people would handle this?

Buy a third hygrometer? lol Just average them? ...etc.?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
Relative humidity measurements at the level of a common, cheap device is more about magic than accuracy.

You should consider those readings equally as 'comfortable'. That'll just fit the accuracy of such devices.

If you prefer to push this to the extreme then as a calibration, you can check the level of comfort according to the readings.

BTW thermometers are the same (to some extent). So just keep in mind that if you wish to know the temperature, then you should never buy a second thermometer, since that'll only bring confusion :wink:
 
What is the make/model of the handheld? It might have a published accuracy and I'd expect it to be much better than the one on the humidifier.
 
Ideally, a RH measuring device should 'equilibrate' quickly - In my experience that isn't always the case. Running the measuring devices side-by-side for an extended length of time might produce a smaller error.
 
Age matters too; humidity meter accuracy drifts/decays over time. I'm not clear on the operating principle, but whatever it is, it is a lot less stable/repeatable than, say, a temperature measurement.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: kyphysics
russ_watters said:
I'm not clear on the operating principle,
Stretching hair (human or animal, occasionally spider silk), or assorted artificial fibers in torsion mechanisms, or other mechanical linkages, ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary
Bystander said:
Stretching hair (human or animal, occasionally spider silk), or assorted artificial fibers in torsion mechanisms, or other mechanical linkages, ...
Even in a digital meter?
 
  • #10
Bystander said:
Stretching hair (human or animal, occasionally spider silk), or assorted artificial fibers in torsion mechanisms, or other mechanical linkages, ...
Maybe for the cheap ones. Good sensors use engineered materials and look for changes in physical parameters like dielectric constant or resistivity. Trust me, you won't find farm animals in the production processes of modern sensor manufacturers.

https://www.fierceelectronics.com/components/choosing-a-humidity-sensor-a-review-three-technologies

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/humidity-sensor
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #11
russ_watters said:
What is the make/model of the handheld? It might have a published accuracy and I'd expect it to be much better than the one on the humidifier.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XTPTG1J/?tag=pfamazon01-20

~$15 Probably one of the cheaper ones, Russ. Not that price determines quality always, but just saying.
 
  • #12
Rive said:
Relative humidity measurements at the level of a common, cheap device is more about magic than accuracy.

BTW thermometers are the same (to some extent). So just keep in mind that if you wish to know the temperature, then you should never buy a second thermometer, since that'll only bring confusion :wink:
re: accuracy relative to price
How would one know the price threshold for accuracy? ...w/o buying the biggest/baddest hygrometer out there (w/ the assumption it's the most accurate)? It's a device I find useful, but wouldn't spend $100 on, for example...$50...mehhhh...okay, I'd spend that.

re: thermometer accuracy
Any data on the margin of error we're talking about for your average thermometer?
 
  • #13
Btw, I am mainly interested in RH levels for mold growth thresholds (making sure my environment is below those levels). Usually not a big deal to me otherwise.
 
  • #14
I have two electronic-based hygrometers in the same room about 7 feet apart, they are both an 'added feature' to battery operated clocks. One reads 38%, the other 58%.

A hygrometer in the dehumidifier reads 40%, which experience shows reads low relative to a wet-bulb/dry-bulb hygrometer. (currently out of service because of a mold-contaminated wick :cry:)

Based on the above numbers, I would consider random electronic hygrometers to have accuracy of ±10% of full scale.

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kyphysics, Rive and russ_watters
  • #15
Also since they measure relative humidity, if you are holding your handheld in hot hands it may affect the reading.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: kyphysics
  • #16
kyphysics said:
How would one know the price threshold for accuracy? .
I don't know: never bothered with devices above $30...

kyphysics said:
Any data on the margin of error we're talking about for your average thermometer?
By my experience, for these common/cheap things 2-3 degree (within the usual 0-50 degree Celsius) is pretty common.

kyphysics said:
Btw, I am mainly interested in RH levels for mold growth thresholds
That's a nasty topic, and contrary to the intuitive approach temperature is more important than raw RH value.

We have a wood stove (masonry heater, actually), and at winter RH can go as low as 25-30% (despite any effort to raise it a bit to the not-so-itchy range). And we still has some mold in the corners - mostly, because the comfortable temperature is way too high (around 23 degree Celsius) in this under-insulated house.

Check the RH vs. dew point graphs! Those are the most useful data for mold prevention.
 
  • #17
kyphysics said:
re: accuracy relative to price
How would one know the price threshold for accuracy? ...w/o buying the biggest/baddest hygrometer out there (w/ the assumption it's the most accurate)? It's a device I find useful, but wouldn't spend $100 on, for example...$50...mehhhh...okay, I'd spend that.
The only way to really know an instrument's accuracy (when new) is to buy something with a published accuracy. For example, here's one with +/-5% accuracy for $27 USD:
http://www.extech.com/products/RHM15

You can find +/-2%, but they are typically much more expensive.
kyphysics said:
re: thermometer accuracy
Any data on the margin of error we're talking about for your average thermometer?
Temperature is much easier to measure. Typically you can find +/- 1-2F (or 1C) accuracy even in pretty inexpensive meters.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: kyphysics

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
853
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K