My new website: watered down physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsFan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The new website "Watered Down Physics" aims to simplify complex physics concepts for novices, created by a social sciences professor with a passion for physics. The site features introductory entries on topics like matter and fundamental particles, with plans for weekly updates. The creator emphasizes reliance on source materials due to limited formal training in physics. The blog serves as a resource not only for beginners but also for professionals who may want to explain physics to non-experts. Feedback and suggestions are welcomed to enhance the content and accuracy of the site.
PhysicsFan
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
my new website: "watered down physics"

I would like to invite everyone -- particularly those on the novice side -- to visit my new website:

http://watered-down-physics.blogspot.com/

I am not a physicist (I'm a professor at Texas Tech University in the social sciences), but I really enjoy reading about physics as a hobby. Probably about 80% of my leisure reading for the past year has been in physics, including the following books:

The Fabric of the Cosmos, Brian Greene (who was on David Letterman last night)
Supersymmetry, Gordon Kane
The Quantum Quark, Andrew Watson
The Strange Story of the Quantum, Banesh Hoffmann
QED, Richard Feynman (currently reading it)

I enjoy talking about the subject matter so much that, I thought, why not start a blog to present physics concepts in simplified (i.e., watered-down)form, which is really the only way I can comprehend and communicate physical concepts. Given my meager formal training in physics (a year in high school, plus a first course in calculus-based physics for life-science majors as an undergrad at UCLA), I will, of necessity, stick closely to source materials in doing my write-ups.

Thus far, I'm enjoying particle physics the best, but I plan to branch out into other areas.

I have done two entries so far, one introducing the website (March 12) and the other introducing matter and fundamental particles (March 18). I invite you to read these. The entries are displayed with the most recent on top. I plan to write a new entry on a roughly weekly basis.

As I noted above, the website is meant primarily for novices like myself. That David Letterman would have Brian Greene on last night (promoting the paperback version of The Fabric...) suggests that there's some interest among the lay public in learning rudimentary concepts of physics. However, even those of you who are professional physicists or students of physics may find a use for the website. You probably have friends and family members asking you what physicists do, so now you can refer them to my page.

If, after viewing the website, you have any comments, suggestions, or corrections of errors (hopefully I won't make many :smile:), please either list them below in this thread or e-mail me (an e-mail link through my faculty homepage is available on the website).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Alan!
I think it's great that you take your time in building a bridge between the "two cultures".

I haven't yet scrutinized your website, but I'll see if I can come with any comments of substance.
I wish you all the best of luck.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top