My Solar Progress: August Electric Bill Savings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chi Meson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the financial implications and performance of a solar hot water heating system, specifically focusing on electric bill savings and payback periods. Participants share their experiences and perspectives on the viability and efficiency of solar energy systems, particularly in different geographical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports a reduction in electricity consumption from 27 kWh/day to 15 kWh/day, leading to a savings of $61.69 in August compared to the previous year.
  • Another participant expresses concern that a payback period of over 18 months is too long, suggesting that in the Northeast US, a payback of 8 years for solar hot water installations is more typical.
  • A different viewpoint acknowledges that a 3-year payback is better than expected and highlights the benefits of subsidies.
  • Some participants mention potential state tax credits and rebates, noting that these vary by location, with one stating there are no state incentives in Connecticut.
  • Concerns are raised about the long-term value of investments in solar technology, with one participant questioning the viability of a 10-year payback period.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of energy savings, stating that the financial savings are a bonus to the energy conservation achieved.
  • Another participant notes that the true test of the system's efficiency will come during the winter months when sunlight is less abundant.
  • There is a discussion about the pace of technological advancements in solar energy and whether improvements could affect the investment's value in the near future.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the payback period for solar hot water systems, with some considering 3 years acceptable while others argue it should be shorter. There is no consensus on the expected payback period, and the discussion reflects a range of experiences and expectations based on geographical location and system type.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could influence the payback period, including geographic location, local incentives, and seasonal variations in sunlight. There are also concerns about potential maintenance costs and the future of solar technology.

Chi Meson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
11
This just in: My August electric bill. August was the first full month (Billing cycle month, that is) in which my solar hot water heater has been fully functional. Compared to August 2006, my consumption of electricity has gone from 27 kWh/day, to 15 kWh/day.

At $.16 per kWh, that's $2.43 per day, as opposed to $4.42 per day.

Realized savings for the first month: $61.69

Final cost of system: $3600 - 30%(Federal tax credit)= $2520

At this rate, payback will occur in 3 years, 5 months. But of course, this will not be the case since there will be less sun in the coming months.

It is my conjecture however, that even more will be saved during the temperate months since during the summer we tend to use the least amount of hot water. A lot of electric use was for the whole-house fan and the dehumidifiers (and refrigerator).

I'm going to go burn some tires in celebration!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Yikes 3 years minimum? Anything over 18 months is too high. Too much can change after that.
 
Thrice said:
Yikes 3 years minimum? Anything over 18 months is too high. Too much can change after that.

I'm sorry, but we can't be talking about the same thing. Up here, in the Northeast US, for a major solar hot water installation a payback sooner than 8 years is considered good. For a PV system, payback is considered excellent if it occurs within 10 years. If one is lucky enough to live in a non-freeze zone, where all is needed is little more than a black plastic bag, I suppose an 18 month payback is expected. What kind of system are you referring to?

"Too much can change after that"? The only thing that will significantly change in the next decade is the rates will double or triple.
 
3 years is better than I would have expected. That subsidy is a nice gift.
 
Plus you should be getting income tax and state rebates, here in MI, a system like yours would credit you almost 1000 dollars to your state taxes.
 
Plus you're actually saving energy. Let's not forget that! The fact that it also saves money is a bonus.

- Warren
 
hypatia said:
Plus you should be getting income tax and state rebates, here in MI, a system like yours would credit you almost 1000 dollars to your state taxes.

There is no state incentive in Connecticut for solar hot water.
 
Chi Meson said:
I'm sorry, but we can't be talking about the same thing. Up here, in the Northeast US, for a major solar hot water installation a payback sooner than 8 years is considered good. For a PV system, payback is considered excellent if it occurs within 10 years. If one is lucky enough to live in a non-freeze zone, where all is needed is little more than a black plastic bag, I suppose an 18 month payback is expected. What kind of system are you referring to?

"Too much can change after that"? The only thing that will significantly change in the next decade is the rates will double or triple.
I mostly deal with IT & it's a faster field, but I can't help but think there are better investments to be made. Money right now is much more valuable than money over a period of time & a 10 year payback period is pretty much like throwing it away. Also are there any additional operation/maintenance costs? Any chance the tech will improve in ~2 years?

A bit of googling & it seems high payback periods are typical. Alternative energy has some ways to go before it's mainstream.
 
Chi Meson said:
But of course, this will not be the case since there will be less sun in the coming months.
The true test will come in December/Jan around the Winter Solstice, and during Jan/Feb/March depending on the cloud cover and precipitation.
 
  • #10
Thrice said:
Money right now is much more valuable than money over a period of time & a 10 year payback period is pretty much like throwing it away.

See Warren's post

croot said:
Plus you're actually saving energy. Let's not forget that! The fact that it also saves money is a bonus.

with which I heartily agree.

Chi Meson, this is cool! Or should I say hot!
 
  • #11
Thrice said:
I mostly deal with IT & it's a faster field

Information Technology is a faster field than Active-Closed loop Glycol Solar Hot Water Heating? Are we even close to talking about the same thing?
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
91
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K