Mybe stupid but i would like to know (vehicles in relative motion)

  • Thread starter ajlen
  • Start date
  • #1
5
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

So we have moving truck at 100mph, on truck is truck moving 100mph, then on this truck is truck moving 100mph, and on this truck is car moving 100mph.
Then the last car is moving 400mph in space but only 300 from first truck?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Danger
Gold Member
9,607
244
The car is. The last truck is moving 300 in space and 200 from the first.
That, of course, is assuming that they are all moving in the same direction.
 
  • #3
5
0
The car is. The last truck is moving 300 in space and 200 from the first.
That, of course, is assuming that they are all moving in the same direction.

yah i meant the CAR :P sry
 
  • #4
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,529
2,295
So we have moving truck at 100mph, on truck is truck moving 100mph..
The second truck is moving 100mph relative to what?

Don't forget the first truck is on a planet that's orbiting the sun at around 67,000 miles an hour and the solar system is orbiting the galaxy at about 514,000 miles an hour. How fast is that car actually going?
 
  • #5
5
0
Oh i missed that, i meant relative to our mother earth.
 
  • #6
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,920
5,616
So we have moving truck at 100mph, on truck is truck moving 100mph, then on this truck is truck moving 100mph, and on this truck is car moving 100mph.
Then the last car is moving 400mph in space but only 300 from first truck?
Yes, but not "in space", rather "relative to the ground". ALL motion is relative and when you say that something is "moving" it doesn't mean anything unless you say RELATIVE TO WHAT.

We normally leave that out in everyday life because the context normally makes it clear what you are referring to. For example, when you said the first truck was moving at 100mph, that is technically a meaningless statement because you did not say relative to what, but we all know that you meant "relative to the highway".

In physics we don't make those assumptions because it can lead to confusion.
 
  • #7
Danger
Gold Member
9,607
244
In physics we don't make those assumptions because it can lead to confusion.
I did, in assuming that ajlen meant Earth when s/he said space. :redface:
 
  • #8
5
0
+1 to that :)
Wont miss out that anymore: "relative to"
 
  • #9
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,529
2,295
The second truck is moving 100mph relative to what?
Oh i missed that, i meant relative to our mother earth.
I don't think you did :)

If they are all going 100mph relative to the earth then the final car is also going 100mph relative to the earth (and 0mph relative to all the trucks).

If they are all going 100mph relative to the one they are on then the final car is going 400mph relative to the earth (and 300mph relative to the first truck).
 
  • #10
5
0
basically i said, truck moving 100mph, and truck on him moving 100mph obviously relative to truck below...etc.
so the car is 400mph to earth
 
  • #11
Danger
Gold Member
9,607
244
Hang on here! I just re-read the original post. It doesn't matter to what the first truck is relative. Every other element of the question is referenced to that same "unknown", via the preceding element, regardless of what it is.
 
  • #12
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,920
5,616
Hang on here! I just re-read the original post. It doesn't matter to what the first truck is relative. Every other element of the question is referenced to that same "unknown", via the preceding element, regardless of what it is.
I think you need to read it again and maybe think about it. Did you perhaps overlook the statement "the last car is moving 400mph in space"
 
  • #13
Danger
Gold Member
9,607
244
Did you perhaps overlook the statement "the last car is moving 400mph in space"
I didn't overlook it; it just seems extraneous. Maybe this illustrates the difference between competing viewpoints which to me (and I could very well be wrong) are equally valid. From my perspective, the wording of the question demonstrates a clear, logical chain of events (cause and effect) that demands the acceptance of the same reference frame for the first truck and the car. If someone asks for the muzzle velocity (properly muzzle speed) of a bullet, it's pretty much guaranteed that he means relative to the gun, not relative to someone on a boat travelling opposite to the train that the gun is on.
 
  • #14
So we have moving truck at 100mph (2what?), on truck is truck moving 100mph (2what?), then on this truck is truck moving 100mph (2what?), and on this truck is car moving 100mph.(2what?)
Then the last car is moving 400mph in space but only 300 from first truck?
Relative to what ?
 

Related Threads on Mybe stupid but i would like to know (vehicles in relative motion)

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
712
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Top