1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Mysteriously simple containment questions

  1. May 20, 2013 #1
    Prove that the set i) S[itex]\subseteq[/itex] S(Closure)
    ii) (Sint)int = Sint

    Ok these supposedly simple containment questions irk me every time, how simplistic do I have to unravel the darn definitions:

    Attempts: i) Let x [itex]\in[/itex] S(Closure)
    ==> x[itex]\in[/itex]S or x[itex]\in[/itex][itex]\partial[/itex]S (Boundary of S)
    ==> if x[itex]\in[/itex]S the there exists a B(r,x) [itex]\subseteq[/itex] S
    likewise if x[itex]\in[/itex][itex]\partial[/itex]S then there exists the
    B(r,x)[itex]\cap[/itex]S ≠∅ and B(r,x)[itex]\cap[/itex]Sc≠∅

    ==> S[itex]\subseteq[/itex] S(Closure) I really don't see what else can be done



    ii) isn't this just direct from the definition of the Sint? I mean it's the interior of an interior.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 20, 2013 #2

    verty

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    i) First try to prove a simpler statement that is analogous to what you are asked to prove. For example, how would you prove that S⊆ S?

    PS. This is all the help I can give here.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Mysteriously simple containment questions
  1. Simple Simple question (Replies: 1)

  2. Simple Question. (Replies: 3)

  3. Simple question (Replies: 7)

  4. Simple question (Replies: 4)

Loading...