MHB Natural Isomorphism b/w Dual Spaces Tensor Prod & Multilinear Form Space

caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
I am trying to prove the following.

Let $V_1, \ldots, V_k$ be finite dimensional vector spaces over a field $F$.
There is a natural isomorphism between $V_1^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k^*$ and $\mathcal L^k(V_1, \ldots, V_k;\ F)$.

Define a map $A:V_1^*\times\cdots\times V_k^*\to \mathcal L^k(V_1, \ldots, V_k;\ F)$ as
\begin{equation*}
A(\omega_1, \ldots, \omega_k)(v_1, \ldots, v_k)=\omega(v_1)\cdots\omega_k(v_k)
\end{equation*}
for all $(\omega_1, \ldots, \omega_k)\in V_1^*\times\cdots\times V_k^*$.
It can be seen that $A$ is a multilinear map.
By the universal property of tensor product, there exists a unique linear map $\tilde A: V_1^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k^*\to \mathcal L^{k}(V_1, \ldots, V_k; \ F)$ such that $\tilde A\circ \pi=A$.

We also know that
\begin{equation*}
\dim V_1^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k^*=\dim \mathcal L^k(V_1, \ldots, V_k; \ F)
\end{equation*}
Thus we just need to show that $\ker \tilde A=0$ to show that $V_1^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k^*$ and $\mathcal L^{k}(V_1, \ldots, V_k; \ F)$ are isomorphic.

My Problem: I want to show the triviality of the kernel in a basis free manner. But here I am stuck.

Can anybody help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
caffeinemachine said:
I am trying to prove the following.

Let $V_1, \ldots, V_k$ be finite dimensional vector spaces over a field $F$.
There is a natural isomorphism between $V_1^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k^*$ and $\mathcal L^k(V_1, \ldots, V_k;\ F)$.

Define a map $A:V_1^*\times\cdots\times V_k^*\to \mathcal L^k(V_1, \ldots, V_k;\ F)$ as
\begin{equation*}
A(\omega_1, \ldots, \omega_k)(v_1, \ldots, v_k)=\omega(v_1)\cdots\omega_k(v_k)
\end{equation*}
for all $(\omega_1, \ldots, \omega_k)\in V_1^*\times\cdots\times V_k^*$.
It can be seen that $A$ is a multilinear map.
By the universal property of tensor product, there exists a unique linear map $\tilde A: V_1^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k^*\to \mathcal L^{k}(V_1, \ldots, V_k; \ F)$ such that $\tilde A\circ \pi=A$.

We also know that
\begin{equation*}
\dim V_1^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k^*=\dim \mathcal L^k(V_1, \ldots, V_k; \ F)
\end{equation*}
Thus we just need to show that $\ker \tilde A=0$ to show that $V_1^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k^*$ and $\mathcal L^{k}(V_1, \ldots, V_k; \ F)$ are isomorphic.

My Problem: I want to show the triviality of the kernel in a basis free manner. But here I am stuck.

Can anybody help?
Instead of trying to show that $\tilde A$ is injective, I think it would be easier to show that it is surjective. This should somehow be equivalent to the fact that a $k\times k$ matrix is a sum of rank $1$ matrices.
 
Opalg said:
Instead of trying to show that $\tilde A$ is injective, I think it would be easier to show that it is surjective. This should somehow be equivalent to the fact that a $k\times k$ matrix is a sum of rank $1$ matrices.
Hello Opalg,

Sorry for the late reply. I somehow forgot about this post.

I can show that $A$ is surjective by choosing a basis. I am getting more and more convinced that this cannot be done without choosing a basis.
 
caffeinemachine said:
I am getting more and more convinced that this cannot be done without choosing a basis.
I tend to agree. For one thing, I believe that the result is false if the spaces are infinite-dimensional. So you somehow need to make use of the fact that the spaces are finite-dimensional, and the obvious way is to choose bases for them.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K