Need Help - dragging a trunk up a loading ramp

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lolagoeslala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ramp
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a man dragging a 68 kg trunk up a loading ramp with a slope of 20 degrees. The man pulls with a force at an angle of 30 degrees to the ramp, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.28. The objective is to determine the necessary force to accelerate the trunk at 0.55 m/s².

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking down forces into components parallel and perpendicular to the ramp. There is confusion regarding the application of equilibrium conditions and the role of acceleration in the problem. Some participants suggest checking the correctness of angles used in calculations and the assumptions about equilibrium.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various approaches to set up the equations needed to solve for the force. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need for two equations to solve for the two unknowns, and there is an acknowledgment of the importance of including acceleration in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of force components and equilibrium conditions, with some expressing uncertainty about the correct setup for the equations. There is a focus on ensuring that the forces are correctly accounted for in relation to the trunk's acceleration.

Lolagoeslala
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Need Help -- dragging a trunk up a loading ramp

Homework Statement


A man is dragging a 68 kg trunk up the loading ramp of a movers truck, the ramp has a slope of 20deg and the man pulls upward with a force F whose direction makes an angle of 30deg with the ramp. The coefficient of kinetic friction between trunk and the ramp is 0.28. What force F is necessary to accelerate the trunk up the loading ramp at a rate of 0.55m/s^2?

Image: first one
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/61/p6nj9.jpg/

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I broke the F in two parts one on the vertical and the other on the horizontal same with the gravity but now i am confused...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Find the components of the forces that are either parallel to the ramp or perpendicular to the ramp (rather than horizontal and vertical components.) The reason is that if you know the direction of the acceleration, then it's almost always a good idea to work with the components that are in the direction of the acceleration or perpendicular to the acceleration. That will make application of the 2nd law easier. In this problem you know the direction of the acceleration is up the ramp.
 


TSny said:
Find the components of the forces that are either parallel to the ramp or perpendicular to the ramp (rather than horizontal and vertical components.) The reason is that if you know the direction of the acceleration, then it's almost always a good idea to work with the components that are in the direction of the acceleration or perpendicular to the acceleration. That will make application of the 2nd law easier. In this problem you know the direction of the acceleration is up the ramp.

Hey i did do that..
then i got this answer...
but the checking was not correct..
My solution:
I broke the gravity components into perpendicular and parallel so
as a vertical equilibrium i got:
mgcos20deg=Fn+Fsin30deg

and as horizontal equilibrium i got:
Fcos30deg=μFn+mgsin20deg

I rearranged the horizontal equilibrium for F to find the Fn in the first equation
like the following:
F= ((μFn+mgsin20deg)/cos30deg)
then:

mgcos20deg=Fn+((μFn+mgsin20deg)/cos30deg)(sin30deg)
By adding into all the given information i got 425.81N=Fn

I plugged that into the friction formula Ff=μFn to find friction which i got was 119.2268N

then i used this equation to use the acceleration given and find the F:
Fnet=Fcos30deg-mgsin20deg-Ff
ma=Fcos30deg-mgsin20deg-Ff
F= 444.04 N

But when i am checking the answer in the vertical equilibrium from before:
mgcos20deg=Fn+Fsin30deg
626.21N=425.8N+222.02N
626.21N=647.82N
 


OK, so you are using "horizontal" to mean parallel to the ramp, and "vertical" to mean perpendicular to the ramp.
Lolagoeslala said:
I broke the gravity components into perpendicular and parallel so
as a vertical equilibrium i got:
mgcos20deg=Fn+Fsin30deg
Check to see if you really want to use 20 degrees here. [Edit: MY fault. 20 degrees is correct!]
and as horizontal equilibrium i got:
Fcos30deg=μFn+mgsin20deg
Are you dealing with an equilibrium situation in the direction parallel to the ramp?
 
Last edited:


TSny said:
OK, so you are using "horizontal" to mean parallel to the ramp, and "vertical" to mean perpendicular to the ramp.

Check to see if you really want to use 20 degrees here.

Are you dealing with an equilibrium situation in the direction parallel to the ramp?

Well yes i think you would use 20 degrees because that is the gravity angle.
Yes i am using the direction parallel to the ramp...
 


What angle does the force of gravity make with respect to the direction of the ramp?
 


Never mind, you are correct! The angle you want is 20 deg. Sorry.
 
Last edited:


TSny said:
Never mind, you are correct! Sorry.

But how come when i do the checking the answer is totally different? Which other way would you recommend to do this question?
 


How are you going to include the fact that the trunk is accelerating?
 
  • #10


TSny said:
But how are you going to include the fact that the trunk is accelerating?

Well see i used the this equation
Fnet=Fcos30deg-mgsin20deg-Ff
which looks at the horizontal (parallel to ramp) forces, since the vertical forces cancel out...
To find the F which includes the a= acceleration of 0.55m/s^2 and then i did the following math...
ma=Fcos30deg-mgsin20deg-Ff
F= 444.04 N
And that was the force i got...
 
  • #11


Go back to where you said:
Lolagoeslala said:
and as horizontal equilibrium i got:
Fcos30deg=μFn+mgsin20deg
This is not correct, the forces are not in equilibrium in the horizontal direction.
 
  • #12


TSny said:
Go back to where you said:

This is not correct, the forces are not in equilibrium in the horizontal direction.

Why are they not equilibrium... i mean when you create the FBD,,,, the gravity and the friction force pull down while the applied force (F) is pulling upwards with the acceleration of 0.55m/s^2
 
  • #13


If the force components parallel to the ramp were in equilibrium, the trunk would not accelerate up the ramp. You essentially have two unknowns: Fn and F. Need two equations. One equation is your equation for the components of the forces perpendicular to the ramp. For the other, use your equation ma = Fcos30 - mgsin20 - Ff.
 
  • #14


TSny said:
If the force components parallel to the ramp were in equilibrium, the trunk would not accelerate up the ramp. You essentially have two unknowns: Fn and F. Need two equations. One equation is your equation for the components of the forces perpendicular to the ramp. For the other, use your equation ma = Fcos30 - mgsin20 - Ff.

Umm so you want me to add these two equation,,
i mean the following:

mgcos20deg=Fn+Fsin30deg
and ma = Fcos30 - mgsin20 -Ff...
but i am not sure what to do...
i mean could u show me how o get started i understand your appoint on the equilibrium,,,
 
  • #15


In the second equation you know how you could express Ff in terms of Fn and the coefficient of friction. So, you then have two equations with two unknowns (Fn and F). See if you can eliminate Fn between the equations to get a single equation with just the unknown F.
 
  • #16


TSny said:
In the second equation you know how you could express Ff in terms of Fn and the coefficient of friction. So, you then have two equations with two unknowns (Fn and F). See if you can eliminate Fn between the equations to get a single equation with just the unknown F.

mgcos20deg=Fn+Fsin30deg
ma = Fcos30 - mgsin20 -μFN

Umm how about i do this...

F= (ma+μFn+mgsin20)/cos30

then i plug into the other equation as mgcos20deg=Fn +((ma+μFn+mgsin20)/cos30)(sin30)
Find the Fn and then use that to find the F?
 
  • #17


That would work. But it might be less work if you solve the first equation for Fn first. Then substitute for Fn in the second equation.
 
  • #18


Or, what would happen if you multiplied the first equation through by μ and then add the two equations?
 
  • #19


TSny said:
Or, what would happen if you multiplied the first equation through by μ and then add the two equations?

oh that would work...
let me try it right away..

however we can't just solve the first equation because f is missing..
 
  • #20


TSny said:
Or, what would happen if you multiplied the first equation through by μ and then add the two equations?

Omg i found the Fn and the F and guess what the checking seems to work!
 
  • #21


Great! Excellent work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
37K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K