MHB Need help finding Diagonals of a Rhombus

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatbluegsx90
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the diagonal measurements of a rhombus-shaped top cover for a terrarium. The height difference between the front and back of the terrarium creates a right triangle, allowing the use of the Pythagorean theorem to find the diagonal lengths. Distance "A" is calculated to be approximately 11.66 inches, while distance "B" is around 8.485 inches, which is close to the user's estimate of 8.5 inches. Additionally, the sides of the rhombus are approximately 7.2 inches, with angles at the vertices measuring about 72 degrees and 108 degrees. These calculations aid in accurately cutting the glass for the terrarium enclosure.
thatbluegsx90
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Not sure where exactly to post this but I think it fits in this category...I recently got interested in making a Terrarium and plan to make the glass enclosure myself.. for the life of me without having the physical thing in front of me I can't figure out one of the diagonal measurements of the top cover.. I apologize for the rough drawing but I'm looking for what A and B are(didn't mean to put the X in there)... I'm about 60% confident that B is 8 1/2 but I has been a while since I've done anything related to this
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    3.9 KB · Views: 123
Mathematics news on Phys.org
From your middle, side view, the back height of the terrarium is 16", the front is 8", and the base is 6". If you draw a line from the top of the front perpendicular to the back (so parallel to the base) you have a right triangle with height 16- 8= 8" and base 8". By the Pythagorean theorem, your distance "A" satisfies A^2= 8^2+ 8^2= 64+ 64= 120. So A= \sqrt{120}= 2\sqrt{15} or about 11" (10.954...). Your distance "B" is just the distance across which is 6+ 6= 12".
 
thatbluegsx90 said:
Not sure where exactly to post this but I think it fits in this category...I recently got interested in making a Terrarium and plan to make the glass enclosure myself.. for the life of me without having the physical thing in front of me I can't figure out one of the diagonal measurements of the top cover.. I apologize for the rough drawing but I'm looking for what A and B are(didn't mean to put the X in there)... I'm about 60% confident that B is 8 1/2 but I has been a while since I've done anything related to this
[TIKZ][scale=0.5]
\coordinate (A) at (-5,2) ;
\coordinate (B) at (1,3) ;
\coordinate (C) at (6,1) ;
\coordinate (D) at (0,0) ;
\coordinate [label=left: $B_1$] (E) at (-5,14) ;
\coordinate [label=above right: $A_1$] (F) at (1,19) ;
\coordinate [label=right: $B_2$] (G) at (6,13) ;
\coordinate [label=left: $A_2$] (H) at (0,8) ;
\draw [very thick] (G) --node
{$12$} (C) --node[below] {$6$} (D) --node[below] {$6$} (A) --node
{$12$} (E) -- (H) ;
\draw [very thick] (E) -- (F) -- (G) -- (H) --node
{$8$} (D) ;
\draw [dashed] (A) -- (B) -- (C) ;
\draw [dashed] (B) --node
{$16$} (F) ;
[/TIKZ]​

In my picture, the distance between $A_1$ and $A_2$ is your distance $A$, and the distance between $B_1$ and $B_2$ is your distance $B$.

Both of the points $B_1$, $B_2$ are $12$ inches above diagonally opposite points of the base of the terrarium. So the distance between them is $6\sqrt2$, which is approximately $8.485$ (close to your estimate of 8 1/2, but a bit less).

The horizontal distance between $A_1$ and $A_2$ is again $6\sqrt2$, but there is also a vertical separation of $16 - 8 = 8$ between them. It follows from Pythagoras's theorem that $A = \sqrt{72 + 64} = \sqrt{136}$, which is approximately $11.66$.

If it helps you in cutting the glass, the sides of the rhombus are approximately $7.2$ inches. The angles at $A_1$ and $A_2$ are almost exactly $72^\circ$ (and the angles at $B_1$ and $B_2$ are almost exactly $108^\circ$).​
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top