Need help finding frequency response of a circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the frequency response function H(f) of a circuit and subsequently determining the output voltage v_{out}(t) in response to a specific periodic input signal. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical explanations related to circuit analysis and transfer functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the process of finding H(f) by first calculating H(s) and substituting s=j2πf, leading to the expression H(f) = 1/(-4π²*10⁻¹⁰f² + j4π*10⁻⁵f + 1).
  • Another participant suggests changing frequency notation from f to ω/2π for clarity, emphasizing the use of radian frequency ω.
  • There is a discussion on evaluating the output voltage v_{out}(t) by considering each harmonic of the input signal separately, with a focus on using phasors for analysis.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how to apply the rewritten transfer function and the input signal to find v_{out}(t), questioning the absence of an s in the input equation.
  • Further clarification is provided on converting the input signal to phasor form and the importance of using the transfer function in the s-domain.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of handling each harmonic term individually and the rationale behind using phasors to simplify calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of evaluating the transfer function and the use of phasors, but there remains uncertainty regarding the application of these concepts to the specific input signal and how to effectively compute v_{out}(t). The discussion reflects multiple viewpoints and some confusion about the steps involved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the conversion of the input signal into the s-domain and how to handle the Riemann sum in this context. Participants also express varying levels of comfort with the mathematical transformations involved.

Nat3
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a problem which has two parts.

1. Find the frequency response function H(f) for a circuit. A hint given is to find H(s) first and then plug in s=j2\pi f to get H(f).

2. Find v_{out}(t), which is the response of the LTIC system to the periodic input signal v_{in}(t) = \sum_{n=1, n \ odd}^{\infty} \frac{8}{\pi^2n^2}\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{4}nt\right) using H(f).

I used KCL on the circuit to find the transfer function H(s):

H(s) = \frac{1}{1*10^{-10}s^2+2*10^{-5}s+1}

Now, the problem hint said to evaluate the function at s=j2\pi f, so if I plug that in then the above equation becomes:

H(f) = H(s)|_{s=j2\pi f} = \frac{1}{-4\pi^2*10^{-10}f^2+j4\pi*10^{-5}f+1}

So, although I don't really understand the above equation (for one thing, I don't get why there would be a "j" in an s-domain equation -- I've never seen that before), I guess I answered the first part of the problem.

My question is, how should I go about solving the second part of the problem, finding v_{out}(t) for the crazy input signal?

Appreciate your advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nat3;4593617 So said:
v_{out}(t)[/itex] for the crazy input signal?

That is the standard way of evaluating a transfer function with sinusoidal inputs. You let s = jw. You will see a lot of this in the future.

I strongly recommend you change f to w/2pi everywhere, right from the start. It's ridiculous to work with f instead of w. w = 2 pi f and is called the radian frequency. BTW I write w because I'm too lazy to write ω.

As for your input: do one n at a time, starting with n = 1, 3 ,5 ... ; for each n, s = jnw1. Then you add all the n terms in a new series, then invert each new term one by one, add all those & you have your vout(t).

Look at cos(pi/4 n t). Rewrite this as cos(nw1t) where w1 = pi/4 which you get by setting pi/4 = w1.

BTW this voltage waveform isn't so screwy - it's probably a square wave or something similar.
 
Thanks for your help. I'm stumped on this problem, so I really appreciate it.

OK, so the equation I had was:

H(f) = H(s)|_{s=j2\pi f} = \frac{1}{-4\pi^2*10^{-10}f^2+j4\pi*10^{-5}f+1}

Following your suggestion to let f = \frac{w}{2\pi}, the above equation becomes

H(\omega) = H(s)|_{s=j\omega} = \frac{1}{-1*10^{-10}\omega^2+j2*10^{-5}\omega+1}

rude man said:
As for your input: do one n at a time, starting with n = 1, 3 ,5 ... ; for each n, s = jnw1. Then you add all the n terms in a new series, then invert each new term one by one, add all those & you have your vout(t).

Look at cos(pi/4 n t). Rewrite this as cos(nw1t) where w1 = pi/4 which you get by setting pi/4 = w1.


For some reason this just isn't clicking for me.. I'm still confused how I can use the rewritten equation, along with:

v_{in}(t) = \sum_{n=1, n \ odd}^{\infty} \frac{8}{\pi^2n^2}\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{4}nt\right)

to find v_{out}(t).

You say to "do one n at a time," and "for each n, s = jnw1", but there isn't an s in the v_{in}(t) equation?
 
Nat3 said:
Thanks for your help. I'm stumped on this problem, so I really appreciate it.

OK, so the equation I had was:

H(f) = H(s)|_{s=j2\pi f} = \frac{1}{-4\pi^2*10^{-10}f^2+j4\pi*10^{-5}f+1}

Following your suggestion to let f = \frac{w}{2\pi}, the above equation becomes

H(\omega) = H(s)|_{s=j\omega} = \frac{1}{-1*10^{-10}\omega^2+j2*10^{-5}\omega+1}


For some reason this just isn't clicking for me.. I'm still confused how I can use the rewritten equation, along with:

v_{in}(t) = \sum_{n=1, n \ odd}^{\infty} \frac{8}{\pi^2n^2}\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{4}nt\right)

to find v_{out}(t).

You say to "do one n at a time," and "for each n, s = jnw1", but there isn't an s in the v_{in}(t) equation?

Take the 3rd harmonic (n = 3). What is v_in(t)?
What is V_in, the phasor of v_in?
Then, what is V_out, the phasor of the output voltage v_out?
Then, what is v_out?

Do this for all odd n, then v_out(t) = Ʃn v_out_n.
 
Thanks again for your help.

rude man said:
Take the 3rd harmonic (n = 3). What is v_in(t)?
What is V_in, the phasor of v_in?

When n=3, the expression inside the Riemann sum is: \frac{8}{9\pi^2}\cos(\frac{3\pi}{4}t).

In phasor form, I believe that is: \frac{8}{9\pi^2}\angle0\deg

rude man said:
Then, what is V_out, the phasor of the output voltage v_out?

How can I find v_{out}(t)? In the S-Domain, I know that:

H(s)=\frac{V_{out}(s)}{V_{in}(s)}

But to use that I would have to find {V_{in}(s)} in the S-Domain, which I don't know how to do since it's a Riemann sum.

Also, what's the point of converting to the phasor domain?
 
Nat3 said:
Thanks again for your help.

When n=3, the expression inside the Riemann sum is: \frac{8}{9\pi^2}\cos(\frac{3\pi}{4}t).
right
In phasor form, I believe that is: \frac{8}{9\pi^2}\angle0\deg

The phasor form is (8/9√(2)π2)ejπ/2 = j(8/9√2π2).
The 1/√2 is to go from peak to rms voltages and the exp(jπ/2) reflects the fact that the input is cos, not sin. Remeber, cos x = sin (x + π/2).
How can I find v_{out}(t)? In the s-Domain, I know that:

H(s)=\frac{V_{out}(s)}{V_{in}(s)}

But to use that I would have to find {V_{in}(s)} in the S-Domain, which I don't know how to do since it's a Riemann sum.

Also, what's the point of converting to the phasor domain?

Riemann sum? You're dealing with one harmonic term at a time, then summing the output v(t) for all n.

The phasor domain is what you have to use to get a v_out from a v_in. It's the s domain with s = jw. It's what you use to deal with steady-state sinusoidal voltages of one frequency.

Your only other choices would be to deal with differential equations in the time domain, or use the Laplace transform, but the former is "forget it" and the latter is more complicated than necessary since that way you solve for the transient as well as the steady-state solution whereas here you're only intersted in the steady-state solution. So, back to phasors:

If in general v(t) = v0 sin(w0t + θ), the corresponding phasor is V = (v0/√2)e.
Note that w0 does not appear in the phasor, it is understood to be w0, and note also how the phase angle is expressed.

Then the output voltage is v_out(t) = √2V |H(jw0)| sin(w0t + ψ).
where ψ is the phase angle of H(jw0).

You need to be comfortable in changing from polar to cartesian complex number description & back. For example, H(jw) is in cartesian form but to multiply with your input phasor you want to change H(jw) to |H(jw)|exp(jψ) where ψ = phase angle of H(jw). This makes complex number multiplication easy and also makes taking the inverse of the output phasor easy to get v_out(t).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K