Need Help on Spivak's Calculus Chapter 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karnage1993
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from Spivak's Calculus, specifically focusing on finding a formula for the sum of the first n odd integers and exploring related sums involving squares of these integers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches to derive the formula for the sum of odd integers and question the reasoning behind the steps taken in Spivak's solution. Some suggest using induction, while others explore visual representations and algebraic manipulations.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the derivation of formulas and the reasoning behind specific steps in the problem. Participants are actively engaging with the material, questioning assumptions, and exploring different interpretations of the problem without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the lack of prior introduction to certain formulas and the challenges faced as first-year students. There are mentions of specific formulas for sums of squares and how they relate to the problem at hand.

Karnage1993
Messages
131
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi, I'm having trouble on a question from Spivak's Calculus 4E. It's on page 27, chapter 2 and question number 2.

He asks to find the formula for n Sigma i=1 (2i -1)= 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1)

Homework Equations



Unfortunately I don't know how to use the symbols on a thread like this; anyone care to assist? :)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well since this is an induction chapter, I tried coming up with a formula using n+1 but that got me into a mess.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Place a dot on a piece of paper. Then add 3 more to make a square with 4 dots. Then add 5 more along the top and right sides of the rectangle. Keep this up. What do you notice?
 
LCKurtz said:
Place a dot on a piece of paper. Then add 3 more to make a square with 4 dots. Then add 5 more along the top and right sides of the rectangle. Keep this up. What do you notice?

Hi, thanks for the help. It ends up being a square so the sum would be n2; however for part 2 of the question, instead of 1+3+5... etc

it is nƩi=1 (2i-1)2 = 12 + 32 + 52 +... + (2n-1)2

So how would I tackle this one? The formula that Spivak comes up with is much more complicated than just n2.
 
Karnage1993 said:
Hi, thanks for the help. It ends up being a square so the sum would be n2; however for part 2 of the question, instead of 1+3+5... etc

it is nƩi=1 (2i-1)2 = 12 + 32 + 52 +... + (2n-1)2

So how would I tackle this one? The formula that Spivak comes up with is much more complicated than just n2.

I don't have a copy of Spivak anymore. I assume he tells you what the sum is. I would just prove it by induction.
 
Here's a different way of doing it: let
S=1+ 3+ 5+ ...+ (2n- 5)+ (2n- 3)+ (2n- 1). Reversing the order of addition doesn't change the result so
S= (2n-1)+ (2n-3)+ (2n-5)+ ...+5+ 3+ 1.

Adding vertically, 1+ (2n-1)= 2n. 3+ (2n-3)= 2n, 5+ (2n-5)= 2n, etc. Every one of those sums is 2n. Since there are n such sums (convince yourself of that!) they total to [itex](2n)(n)= 2n^2[/itex]. Because we have, in fact, added twice, the S is equal to [itex]n^2[/itex].
 
LCKurtz said:
I don't have a copy of Spivak anymore. I assume he tells you what the sum is. I would just prove it by induction.

Yes he says the formula would end up being:

n(2n+1)(2n-1) all over 3, but I am not sure how he got to this point.
 
Karnage1993 said:
Yes he says the formula would end up being:

n(2n+1)(2n-1) all over 3, but I am not sure how he got to this point.

But you don't have to know how the formula was discovered to prove it is correct.
 
Here's how he dealt with the problem:

10f2yah.jpg


My question is how did he come up with the difference in the first step?
 
Karnage1993 said:
Here's how he dealt with the problem:

10f2yah.jpg


My question is how did he come up with the difference in the first step?
Well, in between steps 1 & 2 you could have
= 12 + 22 - 22 + 32 + 42 - 42 + ... + (2n)2 - (2n)2
The author probably thought this step was obvious enough and so did not write it explicitly.

EDIT:
Alternatively, you could expand (2i-1)2. If you know the basic sums ∑i and ∑i2, it is possible to write things out in terms of those.
 
  • #10
Redbelly98 said:
Well, in between steps 1 & 2 you could have
= 12 + 22 - 22 + 32 + 42 - 42 + ... + (2n)2 - (2n)2
The author probably thought this step was obvious enough and so did not write it explicitly.

EDIT:
Alternatively, you could expand (2i-1)2. If you know the basic sums ∑i and ∑i2, it is possible to write things out in terms of those.


Hi, thanks for the assistance. That would make sense that he's adding and subtracting the same values, thereby just adding by 0. However, what I'm confused is how he got from the +...+ to just a non-continuous expression with denominator of 6.

I remember watching a video of someone simplifying nƩi=1 j^2 into an expression with denominator of 6, but that was using induction and adding (j+1)^2 to both sides; something I don't think we had to do for a question like this.
 
  • #11
He is assuming that you already know this formula:

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^n k^2 = \frac{(n)(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}[/tex]

and using it to derive the result for the odd squares.
 
  • #12
LCKurtz said:
He is assuming that you already know this formula:

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^n k^2 = \frac{(n)(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}[/tex]

and using it to derive the result for the odd squares.

Ahh, thank you, that formula fits in with simplifying 12 + 22 + 32 + ... + n2

However, a quick question on that. As we see in the first bracket, the addition ends with (2n)2, but the formula only works for upto n2. Could you clarify how 12 + 22 + 32 + ... + (2n)2 derives from [tex]\sum_{k=1}^n k^2 = \frac{(n)(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}[/tex]

And on a similar note, how would such cases that end with (3n)2 or even (4n)2 derive from that same formula?

Thank you.

(Btw, I wish Spivak would introduce or give us these formulas before the problem sets so I wouldn't be so confused; at only question #2; it's really difficult for me being a 1st year student with no proofs knowledge whatsoever.)
 
  • #13
Karnage1993 said:
Ahh, thank you, that formula fits in with simplifying 12 + 22 + 32 + ... + n2

However, a quick question on that. As we see in the first bracket, the addition ends with (2n)2, but the formula only works for upto n2. Could you clarify how 12 + 22 + 32 + ... + (2n)2 derives from [tex]\sum_{k=1}^n k^2 = \frac{(n)(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}[/tex]

And on a similar note, how would such cases that end with (3n)2 or even (4n)2 derive from that same formula?

That formula works for any positive integer n. 2n is a positive integer so it works for that too. Ditto for any other positive integer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K