Need help with a planet....and other questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter KristijanT
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on creating a fictional planet with boron-nitrogen-based life and ammonia as a solvent, highlighting the challenge of explaining the planet's boron abundance. Cosmic ray spallation is identified as a potential source for boron, where high-energy cosmic rays can create boron from heavier elements, suggesting that proximity to supernovae could also contribute to boron levels. The impact of a cold, dark environment on the senses of life forms is debated, with considerations of how limited light could shape their evolution and intelligence. Additionally, alternatives to oxygen for respiration are explored, with nitrogen-phosphorus biochemistry proposed as a possibility. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for plausible scientific grounding while crafting an engaging narrative.
  • #61
Czcibor said:
Big (more massive than Jupiter) passing by rouge planet that would destabilize the orbit and after a few violent swings put a planet into habitable zone for carbon based life :D

That,I guess,seems cool,though,I doubt they wouldn't discover it until it's too late(?).

BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Anyways, with respect to your Boron situation, I also agree with letting it "go away", as we don't even know how a lot of our stuff here came to be.

That's what it's probably going to be.Though,the black hole idea seems very interesting too.It may be a combination of both though( not knowing how it exactly happened,but having this theory that you propose,for example?).

mfb said:
The stellar surface doesn't change so quickly, but the interior does. This paper suggests we can get days to hundreds of years of warning time for stars in relevant distances (hundreds of light years), depending on the quality of neutrino detectors. Nice for science fiction: you can adjust the warning time as you like.

What about a warning time of...few hours? :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
If your species doesn't have large neutrino detectors, you easily get a few hours. We had that for SN1987A, 150 thousand light years away. Three hours before the visible light from the explosion reached us about 30 neutrinos were detected here on Earth with the detectors of 1987. Scale this to 100 light years distance and we would have received 30 millions, probably saturating some detectors. Even small detectors (small for neutrino physics) can measure such an intense flux.
The warning time doesn't depend on distance here as neutrinos and light are (nearly) at the same speed.
 
  • #63
KristijanT said:
That,I guess,seems cool,though,I doubt they wouldn't discover it until it's too late(?).
Depends. What's their tech level? Which devices they have?
 
  • #64
Czcibor said:
Depends. What's their tech level? Which devices they have?

Their tech level would be: hugely higher than ours.Devices? Well,a device that can basically store the whole civilization into a virtual world(which is by the way,a prototype -- so,then,a not finished device) -- which is,I know,hugely fictional,but I don't really plan on doing a ultra-hard sci-fi.More of a...between soft and hard sci-fi.That's why I have a hard time thinking of an (cosmological,preferably) event that will leave them little time to evacuate(into the device I just mentioned -- and trigger the events that lead to the beginning of the story.)

But it's all kinda unique,because,as we discussed earlier,their astronomy isn't very much developed,so...that's something to use,I guess?
 
  • #65
KristijanT said:
Their tech level would be: hugely higher than ours.Devices? Well,a device that can basically store the whole civilization into a virtual world(which is by the way,a prototype -- so,then,a not finished device) -- which is,I know,hugely fictional,but I don't really plan on doing a ultra-hard sci-fi.More of a...between soft and hard sci-fi.That's why I have a hard time thinking of an (cosmological,preferably) event that will leave them little time to evacuate(into the device I just mentioned -- and trigger the events that lead to the beginning of the story.)

But it's all kinda unique,because,as we discussed earlier,their astronomy isn't very much developed,so...that's something to use,I guess?

Damn...
At such moment their starting conditions would no longer limit their space technology (in the same way as in ancient times northern part of North America or northern Europe were not good place to start a civilization... From times of industrial revolution it no longer matter...).

Attack by a different civilization using:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_kill_vehicle

?

Other approach... What if they launch some experiment that goes really bad?
Like a working model of a black hole... ? (needs something better, I know...)
 
  • #66
Though -- I forgot to mention.Actually,the civilization is -- as I said,yes,with a hugely higher tech level than ours...BUT: the reason for this is only a recent breakthrough(some 40-60 human years) discovery -- which,yep,you guessed it,helped them vastly improve their technology.Before that -- they were,well,yeah,more advanced than us(for example,knew of Earth,could travel much bigger distances -- not galactically huge,or traveling 100 LY and getting back in a day,but,for example,travelling 10+ LY and getting back for them would be like sending a manned mission to Mars,and getting it back for us).
 
  • #67
Czcibor said:
Other approach... What if they launch some experiment that goes really bad?
Like a working model of a black hole... ? (needs something better, I know...)

Yeah,seems good,but,a black hole would,I guess,give them too little time,eh?

EDIT:

And,I also want to avoid other (existing in the present) civilizations because I don't want a space opera as a result.
 
  • #68
A tiny black hole would need some time to destroy a planet, where the time depends on the initial size of the black hole. It would take even longer with a star.
 
  • #69
Interesting theme. Let me try to add some answers... I'm not a physicist though, some "facts" may be false.
1) Why is there boron?
Near the galactic center, the stars form faster and bigger, so your system could be a 3rd generation rather than 2nd like ours, thus having more heavy elements. That still makes C&N&O more abundant than B though... Maybe there is a shell rich with boron in a supernova explosion, and your planet formed just in the right spot. In fact, two star systems formed. The other is circling the galactic core at a slightly different speed (as its distance is different), and now it's just where you need it :biggrin:
2) The event
As there are more stars near the galactic center, another supernova explosion is the obvious candidate. Or a gamma ray burst. Perhaps the planet has already been hit and now its wildlife is collapsing? You don't even need astronomy for that.
3) The advancement
Obviously, the development of generic artificial intelligence will have a tremendous impact on all of science... and goes well together with a supercomputer capable of storing the population of a planet.
Another choice would be fusion power. Perhaps energy is the scarce resource on the planet, and with fusion-powered farms, the population is growing rapidly, having more scientists etc. Does not play well with wildlife collapse from (2) though, they just would not care.
4) Eyes
Perhaps many tiny eyes would be embedded in skin, adapted from leaves? After all, not being able to photosyntesize is a huge disadvantage...

But truth is, you should be the one coming with ideas...
 
  • #70
SlowThinker said:
1) Why is there boron?
Near the galactic center, the stars form faster and bigger, so your system could be a 3rd generation rather than 2nd like ours, thus having more heavy elements. That still makes C&N&O more abundant than B though... Maybe there is a shell rich with boron in a supernova explosion, and your planet formed just in the right spot. In fact, two star systems formed. The other is circling the galactic core at a slightly different speed (as its distance is different), and now it's just where you need it :biggrin:

First,thank you for your post.I've already addressed this question(not knowing what exactly happened,but presenting some theories about it),but,nevertheless,your idea added a bit more to it(another theory),so,thanks.

SlowThinker said:
2) The event
As there are more stars near the galactic center, another supernova explosion is the obvious candidate. Or a gamma ray burst. Perhaps the planet has already been hit and now its wildlife is collapsing? You don't even need astronomy for that.

Truth to be told,it's not as much hard to think of an event that will destroy the planet as it is to think of an event that will destroy the planet and plus leave such an advanced civilization with little time to save themselves.

SlowThinker said:
3) The advancement
Obviously, the development of generic artificial intelligence will have a tremendous impact on all of science... and goes well together with a supercomputer capable of storing the population of a planet.
Another choice would be fusion power. Perhaps energy is the scarce resource on the planet, and with fusion-powered farms, the population is growing rapidly, having more scientists etc. Does not play well with wildlife collapse from (2) though, they just would not care.

Same as for 1),I've got this solved already(by,as I said some couple of posts ago,introducing some really fictional stuff).

SlowThinker said:
4) Eyes
Perhaps many tiny eyes would be embedded in skin, adapted from leaves? After all, not being able to photosyntesize is a huge disadvantage...

Thanks for the idea,although I have it addressed too :smile:

SlowThinker said:
But truth is, you should be the one coming with ideas...

To a certain degree,you are right.I should be the one coming with ideas.And,mostly,I am.
I'm only asking for help about things I'm scratching my head over(an example is the event that gets the planet to extinction,with the advanced civilization thus having little time to respond) or when I want some opinions from other people about certain things(the eyes and other senses being an example).
 
  • #71
Hi! I've been really busy these (20) days,so,I haven't checked the thread (and haven't missed anything,obviously).
I'm here to ask some questions specifically about GRB's(yep,gamma-ray bursts).

For one,what would be an approximate minimum distance at which we are safe from one?
Also,how (little) predictable are they? Warning signs,anything...?

Aaaaaaand,also something that confused me:
To quote from foxnews.com...:

"Earth may lie in the path of a dangerous gamma-ray burst that could wipe out a quarter of our atmospheric ozone. Astronomers say WR 104, a Wolf-Rayet star about 8,000 light years away, could go supernova any day, which would generate gamma-rays that could reach earth."

Uhm,yeah,it can -- but since it's 8000 ly away,doesn't it mean that even if it goes supernova exactly at this moment -- we'll feel the effects here on Earth 8000 years later?
 
  • #72
Yes, but it might have gone supernova 8000 years ago, and we will find out that it did tomorrow!
 
  • #73
Oh,damn,of course.I blame the beer!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K