Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around recommendations for mathematical background books suitable for a graduate course, specifically comparing three titles listed in a syllabus and exploring additional resources. The scope includes theoretical and applied mathematics relevant to physics and chemistry.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Exploratory
Main Points Raised
- Post 1 lists three recommended books: "Mathematical Methods for Physicists" by Arfken, "Mathematical Methods in Chemistry and Physics" by Starzak, and "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" by Boas, and seeks clarification on their differences.
- Post 2 suggests additional resources, including the "Schaum's Outline: Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables," which is noted for its accessibility and usefulness in applied math contexts, particularly in physics.
- Post 2 also mentions Prof Nearing's book, which is free but may be unavailable, and highlights Prof Kip Thorne's recently published book, which aims for a geometric view of the subject.
- Post 2 expresses a preference for Arfken's book but notes the presence of typos and suggests that Boas's book might be more approachable for undergraduates.
- Post 3 advises checking library availability and suggests looking at the books before purchasing, recommending used copies of older editions if buying without prior review.
- Post 4 reiterates the inquiry about the differences among the three main books and provides links to previous discussions about Boas's book.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express varying opinions on the recommended books, with no consensus on which is the best choice. Some participants favor Arfken's book, while others suggest Boas's book may be more suitable for certain audiences. Additional resources are also proposed, indicating a range of preferences and perspectives.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention potential issues with typos in Arfken's book and the accessibility of different texts, but do not resolve these concerns. The discussion reflects a variety of personal experiences and recommendations without definitive conclusions.