Nested sequence of compact sets in Rn has a non-empty intersection?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 6K views
seeker101
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
There's a theorem that says any nested sequence of compact sets in Rn always has a non-empty intersection. So there is something wrong with this counterexample. I'm not able to see what's wrong:

Consider the interval Un = [2-1/n, 1+1/n] for n=1, 2 and 3.
Isn't the intersection of U1, U2 and U3 the null set? (since U3 is the null set?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
seeker101 said:
There's a theorem that says any nested sequence of compact sets in Rn always has a non-empty intersection. So there is something wrong with this counterexample. I'm not able to see what's wrong:

Consider the interval Un = [2-1/n, 1+1/n] for n=1, 2 and 3.
Isn't the intersection of U1, U2 and U3 the null set? (since U3 is the null set?)
There is a theorem that say any nested sequence of non-empty compact sets in Rn is has non-empty intersection.