Net efficiency of a cascaded Carnot Engine and Fridge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the net efficiency of a cascaded Carnot engine and fridge, analyzing the relationships between heat transfer and work output. The equations presented include the work output of the engine, represented as W_{out} = Q_h \left( 1 - \frac {T_r} {T_h} \right), and the work consumed by the fridge, W_r = Q_{in, fridge} \left( \frac {T_l} {T_r} - 1 \right). The participants agree on the assumption that Q_{in, fridge} = Q_l, which simplifies the analysis and maintains the cold reservoir's temperature. This assumption leads to a clearer understanding of the available work ratio, \frac {W^{available}} {Q_h}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Carnot cycle principles
  • Thermodynamic efficiency calculations
  • Heat transfer concepts
  • Understanding of temperature scales in thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the Carnot efficiency formula
  • Research the Second Law of Thermodynamics and its applications
  • Study the concept of heat reservoirs and their role in thermodynamic cycles
  • Investigate the performance of real-world refrigeration systems compared to ideal models
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the efficiency of thermal systems and refrigeration technology.

baseballfan_ny
Messages
92
Reaction score
23
Homework Statement
The efficiency of a heat engine is to be improved by lowering the temperature of its low temperature reservoir to a value ##T_r##, below the environmental temperature ##T_l## by means of a refrigerator. The refrigerator consumes part of the work produced by the heat engine. Assume that both the heat engine and the refrigerator operate reversibly. Calculate the ratio of the net (available) work to the heat ##Q_h## supplied by the heat equation at temperature ##T_h##. Is it possible to obtain a higher net conversion energy efficiency this way?
Relevant Equations
$$ S_{in} = \frac { Q_{in} } { T_{in} } = S_{out} = \frac { Q_{out} } { T_{out} } $$
$$W_{engine} = Q_{in} - Q_{out}$$
$$W_{fridge} = Q_{out} - Q_{in}$$
Here is a diagram of my interpretation of the problem:

pf-engine cascade diagram_1.jpg

Where I'm thinking that the engine originally takes heat from ##T_h## to ##T_l##, in which case ## \frac { Q_{h} } { T_{h} } = \frac { Q_{l} } { T_{l} } ## and ## W_{out} = Q_{in} - Q_{out} = Q_h \left( 1 - \frac {T_l} {T_h} \right) ##.

Then I suppose that because ##T_l## is cooled to ##T_r##, I get ## W_{out} = Q_h \left( 1 - \frac {T_r} {T_h} \right) ##.

The fridge itself consumes a certain amount of work ## W_r = Q_{out, fridge} - Q_{in, fridge} ##. And because ## \frac { Q_{in, fridge} } { T_{r} } = \frac { Q_{out, fridge} } { T_{l} } ## so I can write ##W_r = Q_{in, fridge} \left( \frac {T_l} {T_r} - 1 \right) ##.

And now just trying to get $$ \frac {W^{available} } {Q_h} = \frac {W_{out} - W_r } {Q_h} = \frac { Q_h \left(1 - \frac {T_r} {T_h} \right) - Q_{in, fridge} \left( \frac {T_l} {T_r} - 1 \right) } {Q_h}$$.

But my problem is that I don't know what ##Q_{in, fridge}## is. An optimistic guess I have is that ##Q_{in, fridge} = Q_l ## by sort of applying energy conservation to the reservoir the same way we did to the engines and fridges to get the work delivered or work consumed, but I'm not sure that works that easily in the case of a reservoir? Thanks in advance for the feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So far, your work looks good to me. And I also interpret the problem as implying that we should assume ##Q_{in, fridge} = Q_l##. That way, whatever heat is dumped into the cold reservoir at temperature ##T_r## by the heat engine is removed from the cold reservoir by the fridge and dumped into the environment. So, the cold reservoir can maintain a steady temperature even if the cold reservoir is not huge. Also, the assumption that ##Q_{in, fridge} = Q_l## leads to an interesting result for ##\large \frac{W^{available}}{Q_h}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: baseballfan_ny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
919
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
831