Net electric field by two curved rods

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the electric field produced by two uniformly charged curved rods, each with charge +Q. At the midpoint between the rods, the consensus is that the electric field (E) points downward, contrary to initial assumptions that it would point upward. This conclusion is reached by analyzing the contributions of the electric field from both rods, where the top rod's field cancels with the corresponding segment of the bottom rod, leaving the lower portions of the bottom rod to dominate the field direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with vector addition in physics
  • Knowledge of the principles of superposition in electrostatics
  • Basic geometry related to electric field lines
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principle of superposition in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations for continuous charge distributions
  • Explore the effects of geometry on electric fields
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in different configurations of charged objects
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields generated by charged objects.

celee2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?courses/phys212/oldexams/exam1/sp08/fig4.gif

Two curved rods each have charge +Q uniformly distributed over their length. Which statement best describes the electric field due to these two rods at the midpoint between the two rods marked by an X ?

(a) E points up.
(b) E points down.
(c) E = 0.

Homework Equations



It's more like geometry I think.

The Attempt at a Solution



I definitely thought E would point up since the rod at the bottom has extra length that has positive charge, which would affect electric field to the radially outward direction. But the answer is b, E points down. Could anyone explain the reason? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
E should point up. If your problem statement and diagram are accurate, then the answer is wrong. The top section should cancel out exactly with the segment of the bottom rod that is directly opposite. This leaves two portions of the bottom rod to contribute to the direction of the field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K