New basis for atoms of spatial geometry (intertwiners)

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
Here's the introduction of the paper by Freidel and Hnybida. Quantum geometry is built up of chunks of geometry that contain information relating to volume, areas, angles made with neighbor chunks, etc. The Hilbert space that these chunks (called intertwiners) live in needs a set of basis vectors. The two sets of basis vectors proposed so far have drawbacks. Freidel and Hnybida have discovered a third set of basis vectors that will be better to work with and reveals a Regge limit.
==quote http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3326 page 1==
It has been observed long ago that the compositions of quantum states of angular momentum are related to geometrical objects [1–3]. The simplest example is the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients which vanish unless the spins satisfy the so called triangle relations. A less trivial example is the Wigner 6j symbol which vanishes unless the spins can represent the edge lengths of a tetrahedron. This insight was one of the motivations which led Ponzano and Regge to use the 6j symbol as the building block for a theory of quantum gravity in three dimensions [4, 5], together with the fact that the asymptotic limit of the 6j symbol is related to the discretized version of the Einstein-Hilbert action. In higher dimensions this line of thought led to the idea of spin foam models which are a generalization of Ponzano and Regge’s idea to a four dimensional model of quantum General Relativity. For a review see [6].
Following a canonical approach, Loop Quantum Gravity came to the same conclusion: Geometrical quantities such area and volume are quantized [7]. In fact there are many remarkable similarities between LQG and spin foam models. For instance, the building blocks of both models are SU(2) intertwiners which represent quanta of space [8–10]. An intertwiner is simply an invariant tensor on the group. In other words if we denote by Vj the 2j + 1 dimensional vector space representing spin j then an intertwiner is an element of the SU(2) invariant subspace of this tensor product which we will denote
Hj1,...,jn ≡InvSU(2)[Vj1 ⊗···⊗Vjn].
The vectors in this Hilbert space will be referred to as n-valent intertwiners since they are represented graphically by an n-valent node. The legs of this node carry the spins ji which can be interpreted as the areas of the faces of a polyhedron [11–14] which is a consequence of the celebrated Guillemin-Sternberg theorem [15]. In this paper we will be focused on 4-valent intertwiners but many of the methods developed here can be extended to the n-valent case.
==endquote==
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's sort of boring that there aren't any spare structures "chunk of geometry" free to braid into specific structures that can yield specific fields, like string theory does.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top