- 22,802
- 14,854
With some good will, the "heart" does looks a bit like a dog ... 

OmCheeto said:Chris Hadfield just mentioned that http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/tom0bio-1 's ashes are on the NH spacecraft .
I thought that was very cool.
I'm sure it won't be the last.DaveC426913 said:More detailed images of Pluto reveal startling new features!
View attachment 85953
(You saw it here first, folks.)
Dotini said:Just as we are getting used to the idea that Pluto is a lovable, laughable Disney cartoon, some other mythologists throw underworld demons from Lovecraft and Tolkien into the punchbowl! Lost Carcosa is how I'd like to name that crater with the central peak, located in NE Cthulhu not far from the peach-colored area. Maybe it's ruled by the Yellow King?
![]()
http://space.io9.com/places-on-pluto-are-being-named-for-your-darkest-imagin-1717825166
Nevertheless, I see craters on Charon, but not on Pluto. Could it be that having a surface of mostly water (H2O), nitrogen (ammonia?), methane and CO/CO2, that the kinetic energy of a collision would melt the surface and the liquid phase would then flow back into any cavity and then refreeze, so no craters. It would be interesting to simulate the collision process.|Glitch| said:Mission scientists are surprised by the apparent lack of craters on Charon.
Discoveries about Pluto’s surface“Let me emphasize that we have very little data back, so I don’t know that this will be the biggest discovery. But it is a big discovery. We discovered that Pluto and its moon Charon are still geologically active after all this time, after 4-plus billion years since they were born. That really changes some very deep-seated concepts in planetary science, because the small planets are expected to cool off in much less time than that, so they shouldn’t have an energy budget that allows them to drive active geology after so much time. So our discovery, which flies in the face of that, will cause a big rethink of how planetary engines work.”
So perhaps, a planet can have a relatively smooth, craterless surface.“When we look at Pluto’s surface, and measure it’s composition, which we’ve been able to do from the Earth and from Earth orbit with instruments like the Hubble [Space Telescope], we know that the surface composition is dominated by snows of nitrogen. And it’s the same stuff we’re breathing right now in the air, but on Pluto, it’s frozen as a snow on the surface. And the thing about nitrogen is that it’s a very weak material, so just like sand or other things that we could think of as examples of weak, if you try to pile it up in a big mountain, it’ll just collapse or slump under its own weight. So you can’t have nitrogen mountains.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...e-of-our-solar-system-finally-come-into-focusWith New Horizons, all that has changed. Scientists can now see craters and regions of dark-reddish ground. A large, white, heart-shaped feature on the equator is made of ice, though Pluto is so cold it's probably an ice of nitrogen or methane, rather than water.
I think the most obvious idea is that Pluto's current orbit was the result of some massive collision. Possibly with Triton, Neptune's moon. It could also explain why Triton is the only moon in the solar system with a retrograde orbit. Several papers have suggested a large impact with Pluto in order to create its smaller low-mass moons. Some even suggest that there could be a ring system around Pluto outside the orbit of Pluto's moon Hydra.rootone said:Great result, and still 16 months before we have the full data.
One thing about Pluto (and companions) that I don't yet know an explanation for is,
why is the orbit way adrift of the plane in which all the other planet(oids) are in?
Some 17 degrees out of the usual plane, and not only that, it has a highly non circular orbit so that sometimes is closer to the Sin than Neptune is.
Ideas?
I agree! I was just speculating on that in the Modo forum.Astronuc said:"... that the kinetic energy of a collision would melt the surface and the liquid phase would then flow back into any cavity and then refreeze, so no craters. It would be interesting to simulate the collision process...
Fascinating!
I second that! Very nice to see Charon above, and the close-up of Pluto... I am truly affected by seeing these nice images!Drakkith said:Wow, stunning pictures! And I'm sure the best is yet to come!
Well, since I speculated on that, we learned that nitrogen is a rather weak substance in the solid state, so if Pluto is rich in nitrogen (and perhaps some ammonia), then perhaps the nitrogen flows back into the craters.megacal said:I agree! I was just speculating on that in the Modo forum.
"They say they didn't see any impact craters, but what could explain all those roundish, hexagonal
features?
Maybe a meteorite hit, broke through the crust to the ice below, then re-froze, leaving a
pseudo-crater?
Maybe they are already testing that theory using the super pellet gun
they showed in the NOVA show, Chasing Pluto, vs an ice ball covered with a relatively thin coating of , e.g.
cement? See if it creates those features after impact and re-freezing(?)"
The "gun" is mounted horizontally, but imagine it would need to shoot veritcally/down at any Pluto-like target in 56k environment.
Sounds like a fun experiment.![]()
While Pluto does not resemble Neptune, it does resemble one of Neptune's moons in regard to its composition - Triton.rootone said:Nitrogen snowdrifts burying impact craters.
Apparently some sort of tectonic activity too.
Weird but maybe explainable orbit of the Sun.
Composition as known so far does not resemble Neptune, the only really serious planet somewhere nearby.
mmm - this can only get more interesting,
Michio kaku once said Pluto is an over grown comet , comets don't revolve in the same plane as planets right ?rootone said:Great result, and still 16 months before we have the full data.
One thing about Pluto (and companions) that I don't yet know an explanation for is,
why is the orbit way adrift of the plane in which all the other planet(oids) are in?
Some 17 degrees out of the usual plane, and not only that, it has a highly non circular orbit so that sometimes is closer to the Sin than Neptune is.
Ideas?
Did he really say that?Monsterboy said:Michio kaku once said Pluto is an over grown comet , comets don't revolve in the same plane as planets right ?
But wouldn't that fill in any other surface irregularities? It's not like the surface is completely smooth, there are hills and channels; none of which look particularly "smoothed out". And what about the really big craters? would it be enough to fill them in? The pictures showing tall mountains seems to indicate otherwise. They seem to show that any layer of nitrogen snow must be relatively thin.Garth said:Charon has more craters than Pluto which is surprisingly short of them. I would surmise that this is because Pluto has been able to retain more of an nitrogen atmosphere that locally freezes in the 'winter' filling in any expressions. The gas then only partially sublimes when 'summer' arrives.
Garth
Well the way I see it Sputnik Planum being very light coloured looks like a relatively new (nitrogen) snow field on top of the normal surface, which may well be made of other types of ice and/or rock. Old ice tends to be dirty as it collects interplanetary dust such as on the surface of comets.Janus said:But wouldn't that fill in any other surface irregularities? It's not like the surface is completely smooth, there are hills and channels; none of which look particularly "smoothed out". And what about the really big craters? would it be enough to fill them in? The pictures showing tall mountains seems to indicate otherwise. They seem to show that any layer of nitrogen snow must be relatively thin.
I think someone else suggested that the impacting object could melt the surrounding ice which would then flow back to fill in the crater. But wouldn't that leave circularly shaped "flat smooth spots", like circular frozen lakes? So far none of the pictures I've seen show this. I think we are stuck with recent geological processes erasing craters. ( or may I suggest "hadeological" processes? Since no one has considered such a possibility before, I doubt that they've coined a name for it yet.)
Yes he did say that and yea it has a lot of characteristics of a comet , highly elliptical and inclined orbit , takes a long time to complete a revolution , it grows a tail when it is closer to the sun etc etcDotini said:Did he really say that?
Like a comet, Pluto is on an inclined, elliptical orbit, shows activity, has a sort of a coma, tail of charged particles and a magnetic field. Today there is some blurring between asteroids, comets, planetesimals, et al. But in this age of discovery, some confusion is probably to be expected.
Article said:This newest image further illustrates the remarkably well-defined topography along the western edge of Tombaugh Regio.
“There is a pronounced difference in texture between the younger, frozen plains to the east and the dark, heavily-cratered terrain to the west,” said Jeff Moore, leader of the New Horizons Geology, Geophysics and Imaging Team (GGI) at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California. “There’s a complex interaction going on between the bright and the dark materials that we’re still trying to understand.”
While Sputnik Planum is believed to be relatively young in geological terms – perhaps less than 100 million years old - the darker region probably dates back billions of years. Moore notes that the bright, sediment-like material appears to be filling in old craters (for example, the bright circular feature to the lower left of center).
rootone said:NASA released some new images today.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/gallery/2015/jul/24/pluto-news-nasa-photographs
DaveC426913 said:Wait! That's not a heart!
"Oh NOOZZ! It's..."] [deleted spoiler content] !
Yes Drakkith, I think all that would be useful if one knew the exact time and date of the photo, could calculate the orbits and trajectories of Pluto and Charon and knew the spatial positioning between the two and New Horizons. Since Charon and Pluto orbit each other in binary fashion and New Horizons could be at just about any angle to the two, I'm thinking it's probably not a mental calculation. ;) The common-sense answers provided within this thread provided me with my "duh!" moments - especially the one about crashing into Pluto at 36,000 mph.Drakkith said:But you can! I've given you everything you need to know about the imaging system to do so. (I think I have at least)
Article said:NASA has selected the potential next destination for the New Horizons mission to visit after its historic July 14 flyby of the Pluto system. The destination is a small Kuiper Belt object (KBO) known as 2014 MU69 that orbits nearly a billion miles beyond Pluto.