Is Pluto Really Bigger Than Eris? New Horizons Settles the Debate.

In summary, New Horizons has found that Pluto, with a diameter of 1,473 miles, is larger than its greatest rival, Eris, with a diameter of 1,445 miles. This settles a decades-long debate about the largest object in the Edgeworth-Kuiper belt, with Pluto being classified as a minor planet due to its uncertain diameter caused by its atmosphere. This reclassification is similar to that of Ceres, the largest object in the asteroid belt, which was also upgraded from an asteroid to a minor planet. This change in classification makes sense, as it limits the number of potential planets to just eight, while the many lesser objects are now known as minor planets. Pluto and Eris are significantly larger than
  • #1
CygnusX-1
125
93
New Horizons has found that Pluto is larger than its greatest rival, Eris.

Last year, other observations suggested that Pluto was around 1,471 miles across, which would have meant it was bigger than Eris, whose diameter is 1,445 miles. Link: Pluto Regains Its Title as the Largest Object in Its Neighborhood

Now New Horizons has determined a diameter for Pluto of 1,473 miles. Link: How Big Is Pluto? New Horizons Settles Decades-Long Debate.

The finding means that Pluto is the largest object in the Edgeworth-Kuiper belt, contrary to pronouncements made a decade ago when Eris was discovered.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Interesting, but then we haven't got a vehicle on the way to Eris which could corroborate this.
 
  • #3
No, Eris is simpler than Pluto because Eris has no atmosphere to complicate the observations. The number for Eris's diameter is 1,445 miles plus or minus 7 miles.

Pluto's diameter was much more uncertain because of the planet's atmosphere.

Still, I do like the idea of a mission to Eris!
 
  • #4
Not really, the classification has nothing to with the size of a planetary body.
Pluto was reclassified as a minor planet because it has not established an orbit which is free of other larger bodies.
It turns out in fact to be one of the innermost of the Kuiper belt objects, and we know of many more such objects now, since Pluto was originally discovered.
Some of those other objects are in roughly similar orbits are not very different in size to Pluto.

You might compare this reclassification of Pluto with that of Ceres. the largest object in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.
That has been 'upgraded' from 'Asteroid' to 'Minor Planet'.

I think this reclassification was sensible.
If we grant Pluto the Status of 'Planet', we would also have to classify Ceres and Vesta as planets, plus ten or more other Kuiper belt objects we know about, and there are almost certainly more out there that we don't yet know about.

Instead of hundreds of potential 'planets' we now have just eight, and those are bodies orbiting the Sun in a unique orbit clear of other sizeable bodies.

Other largish bodies which are are not in such unique orbits are now known as the 'Minor planets'
Makes sense to me anyway.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Pluto and Eris are considerably larger than any other known object in the Edgeworth-Kuiper belt. So one can easily call Pluto and Eris planets and the many lesser objects out there nonplanets. Pluto and Eris are more than 50 percent larger than the next largest Edgeworth-Kuiper belt object.
 

What is the controversy surrounding the size of Pluto and Eris?

The controversy surrounding the size of Pluto and Eris centers around the classification of these two objects. For many years, Pluto was considered the ninth planet in our solar system. However, with the discovery of Eris in 2005, which was initially thought to be larger than Pluto, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) reclassified Pluto as a dwarf planet. This decision sparked debate among scientists and the public.

Which is larger, Pluto or Eris?

Based on current measurements, Eris is slightly larger than Pluto. Eris has a diameter of about 2,326 kilometers, while Pluto's diameter is approximately 2,374 kilometers. However, both objects are significantly smaller than the eight planets in our solar system.

Why was Pluto considered a planet for so long?

Pluto was discovered in 1930 and was initially classified as the ninth planet in our solar system. At the time, our understanding of the outer solar system was limited, and Pluto's small size and distance from the sun made it difficult to accurately measure. It wasn't until the 1990s and 2000s that advancements in technology allowed us to discover and measure other objects in the outer solar system, leading to the reclassification of Pluto.

How do scientists measure the size of objects in the outer solar system?

Scientists use various methods to measure the size of objects in the outer solar system, such as Eris and Pluto. One method is through direct imaging using telescopes. Another method is by observing how much light the object reflects, which can give an estimate of its size. Additionally, scientists can use data from flyby missions, such as NASA's New Horizons mission to Pluto, to gather more precise measurements.

What is the current status of the debate over Pluto and Eris?

The debate over the classification of Pluto and Eris is ongoing, with some scientists arguing that these objects should be considered planets based on their characteristics, while others support the IAU's decision to classify them as dwarf planets. Further research and advancements in technology may provide more insight into the debate in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top