New to the forum - Stored energy to melt ice

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chiggs24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Forum Ice
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculations related to melting ice using stored energy from heated water. Participants explore the energy requirements for raising the temperature of ice and the phase change from ice to water, as well as the efficiency of heat transfer in a specific setup involving a plate heat exchanger.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that 334 Joules per gram is needed to change ice to water and 2.03 Joules per gram to raise the temperature of ice by one degree.
  • Another participant questions the calculation of energy required to melt 2 kg of ice from -5°C, suggesting that the total energy needed is 688.3 kJ, including the energy to raise the temperature to 0°C.
  • There is a discussion about the rate of heat flow and how it depends on the thermal contact between the ice and the heated water.
  • One participant calculates the energy available in a 50-liter vessel of water at 50°C and questions how to determine the energy contained within water at different temperatures.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the time frame for heat transfer, suggesting that the calculation of 7 minutes may not be appropriate without considering the specifics of heat transfer dynamics.
  • There is a mention of the complexities involved in calculating energy from absolute zero and the specific heat capacities of different states of water and ice.
  • Participants discuss the potential for storing energy in a vessel based on the energy available and the energy required to defrost ice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and assumptions regarding energy transfer, the time required for melting ice, and the specifics of energy storage. No consensus is reached on the best approach to calculate the energy dynamics involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about thermal contact efficiency, the complexities of calculating energy from absolute zero, and the need for precise definitions of energy states and capacities.

chiggs24
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

New to the forum, but requiring a certain amount of assistance if possible.

In relation to ice defrost time, 334 Joules per gram is required to change the state of ice to water and 2.03 joules per gram is required to raise the temperature of ice by one degree?

With this in mind, is it safe to calculate, that hypothetically, if you have around 2kg of ice and the ambient temperature is minus 5degreesC, in order to melt the ice, you require 20,300J to raise the temperature to 0, then 668,000J to complete the phase change to water, which equates to a total of 0.191194kWh?

If a 50litre vessel of water held at 50 degrees C indoors (20 degree room temperature) contains 1.75kWh, can you then calculate that the vessel will give up 0.20416kW in 7 minutes, enough to melt the 2 kilos of ice?

Im not a physicist, so if any of the above calculations have been wildly misunderstood, please do not hesitate to correct me :)

Thank you all in advance
 
Science news on Phys.org
chiggs24 said:
Hi All,

New to the forum, but requiring a certain amount of assistance if possible.

In relation to ice defrost time, 334 Joules per gram is required to change the state of ice to water and 2.03 joules per gram is required to raise the temperature of ice by one degree?

With this in mind, is it safe to calculate, that hypothetically, if you have around 2kg of ice and the ambient temperature is minus 5degreesC, in order to melt the ice, you require 20,300J to raise the temperature to 0, then 668,000J to complete the phase change to water, which equates to a total of 0.191194kWh?
Welcome to PF. This part is correct.
If a 50litre vessel of water held at 50 degrees C indoors (20 degree room temperature) contains 1.75kWh, can you then calculate that the vessel will give up 0.20416kW in 7 minutes, enough to melt the 2 kilos of ice?
Where do you get the 7 minutes from? The rate of heat flow will depend upon the way the ice is put in thermal contact with the water. A very thin sheet of ice spread over a 5 m^2 surface of the water 1 cm deep will melt faster than a 2kg ice cube.

Also, 50 L of water at 50 degrees contains more than 1.75 kWh of internal energy. I assume you are referring to the heat energy required to raise the temperature of 50L of water from 20C to 50C.

AM
 
Hello Andrew,

Thank you for the quick reply.

The scenario is based upon a plate heat exchanger which has a coating of ice over it. Heated water from a buffer vessel will pass through the heat exchanger in a bid to defrost the formed ice.

The 7 minutes was calculated by; (1.75kWh/60mins)*7mins = 0.20416kW? > 0.191194kW?

In relation to the energy in 50L, I was unintentionally referring to the energy required to heat 20 to 50 degrees C. If this is the case, how do I calculate the energy contained within amount of water n at temperature n?

I would eventually like to get to a point where I can utilize average local relative humidity and prolonged low ambient temperature to calculate how much energy is required to melt ice which will have collected on a Air Source Heat Pump Evaporator.
 
chiggs24 said:
Hello Andrew,

Thank you for the quick reply.

The scenario is based upon a plate heat exchanger which has a coating of ice over it. Heated water from a buffer vessel will pass through the heat exchanger in a bid to defrost the formed ice.

The 7 minutes was calculated by; (1.75kWh/60mins)*7mins = 0.20416kW? > 0.191194kW?
Why not use 7 seconds, or any time at all? (You are dealing with 6300 KJ. of energy. You only need 688.3 KJ to melt the ice at -5C. You could express 6300 KJ as 6.3 MWs. Since you only need .688 MWs to melt the ice, would you then only need .688/6.3 = .1 second to melt the ice?)

There is enough internal energy in 50 L of water at 50C to melt 2 Kg of -5 degree C ice. So the question is how fast can you get that heat energy to flow into the ice? To get maximum rate of heat flow you need maximum thermal contact between the water and the ice.

In relation to the energy in 50L, I was unintentionally referring to the energy required to heat 20 to 50 degrees C. If this is the case, how do I calculate the energy contained within amount of water n at temperature n?
If you want to measure the amount of energy required to heat 50L of water at absolute 0 to 50C (323K) it is very complicated. But that would be the amount in internal energy it contains. You don't need to know that.

I would eventually like to get to a point where I can utilize average local relative humidity and prolonged low ambient temperature to calculate how much energy is required to melt ice which will have collected on a Air Source Heat Pump Evaporator.
You have to have a lot of information about your system to calculate that. You might be able to ballpark it with some simple assumptions.

AM
 
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Mason said:
Why not use 7 seconds, or any time at all? (You are dealing with 6300 KJ. of energy. You only need 688.3 KJ to melt the ice at -5C. You could express 6300 KJ as 6.3 MWs. Since you only need .688 MWs to melt the ice, would you then only need .688/6.3 = .1 second to melt the ice?)
How do you get from 6300KJ to mWs? If 1 kW is equal to 3,600KJ, how do you then convert that to mW?
Also, do you not require 20.3KJ to raise the temperature of -5°C ice to 0, then the 688.3KJ to change state to water? Or is it solely the 688.3KJ to go from ice at -5 to water at 0 degrees C?

Andrew Mason said:
There is enough internal energy in 50 L of water at 50C to melt 2 Kg of -5 degree C ice. So the question is how fast can you get that heat energy to flow into the ice? To get maximum rate of heat flow you need maximum thermal contact between the water and the ice.

I would be flowing at around 50litres per minute back through the heat exchanger.
I take on board what you are saying about thermal contact. If the layer of ice on face of the heat exchanger is 3mm, potentially, only a small amount of that ice needs to be melted in order for the whole layer to shift and fall off. Likewise, if the ice has worked through the heat exchanger, i.e. between the plates, there may be more mass to melt, but also potentially more thermal contact?

Andrew Mason said:
If you want to measure the amount of energy required to heat 50L of water at absolute 0 to 50C (323K) it is very complicated. But that would be the amount in internal energy it contains. You don't need to know that.

You have to have a lot of information about your system to calculate that. You might be able to ballpark it with some simple assumptions.

AM

Would calculating from absolute zero require taking into account the differences in specific heat capacities of the various states (2.03j/g°C for ice and 4.18j/g°C for water)?
If i knew how much energy was available in the vessel and if I calculated how much energy was required to defrost, could I not then store that energy in a vessel?

Thank you again Andrew.
 
chiggs24 said:
Hi Andrew,

How do you get from 6300KJ to mWs? If 1 kW is equal to 3,600KJ, how do you then convert that to mW?
A watt-second is simply a joule. 6300KJ = 6.3MJ = 6.3MWs.

Also, do you not require 20.3KJ to raise the temperature of -5°C ice to 0, then the 688.3KJ to change state to water? Or is it solely the 688.3KJ to go from ice at -5 to water at 0 degrees C?
668KJ + 20.3 KJ = 688.3KJ
Would calculating from absolute zero require taking into account the differences in specific heat capacities of the various states (2.03j/g°C for ice and 4.18j/g°C for water)?
No.
If i knew how much energy was available in the vessel and if I calculated how much energy was required to defrost, could I not then store that energy in a vessel?
Yes.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K