Newton Third Law general equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the acceleration of mass m1 in a system involving two masses, m1 and m2, connected by a pulley. The equations of motion are established using Newton's Second Law, with the net forces on m1 and m2 analyzed. The acceleration constraint between the two masses is clarified, leading to the final expression for m1's acceleration as a1 = 2mg / (4m1 + m2). The tension in the rope is consistent throughout, and the forces acting on m2 are identified as the weight and tension from the ropes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with pulley systems in classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams for analyzing forces
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of acceleration constraints in pulley systems
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams
  • Explore advanced applications of Newton's Laws in multi-mass systems
  • Investigate the effects of friction in pulley systems and their equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding dynamics in multi-body systems.

bigredd87
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
I have a picture provided. You can assume that the table is frictionless. I need an expression for the acceleration of m1.
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_08_40.jpg
    knight_Figure_08_40.jpg
    5.2 KB · Views: 479
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We don't do your homework for you. What are the forces on each mass?
 
here is what I have so far:

Fnetx for m1 is T=m1a
Fnety for m1 is N-m1g=0

I guess my real dilemma is i don't really know what the forces on m2 are. I believe there is no acceleration constraint since m2 is on the second pulley. Does that mean that the tension and weight are equal to m2a, with m2 having a different acceleration than m1?
 
bigredd87 said:
here is what I have so far:

Fnetx for m1 is T=m1a
Fnety for m1 is N-m1g=0
OK. (All you need here is Fnetx.)

I guess my real dilemma is i don't really know what the forces on m2 are.
Treat m2 and its pulley as one object. I see 3 forces acting on it.
I believe there is no acceleration constraint since m2 is on the second pulley.
Of course there is an acceleration constraint, which you need to figure out. When m2 drops X distance, how far must m1 move?

Does that mean that the tension and weight are equal to m2a, with m2 having a different acceleration than m1?
You will apply Newton's 2nd law to m2, just like to m1. Yes, a2 is different from a1, but there is a simple relationship.
 
so a2 =-a1? I didn't understand if the mass on the pulley made it different from other problems. So there is tension T from the rope attached to the wall, the weight force m2g, and the tension from m1 which is m1a1?
 
bigredd87 said:
so a2 =-a1?
No. (But the minus sign is good.) Answer my question earlier: When m2 drops X distance, how far must m1 move? (Get a piece of string and figure it out.)

I didn't understand if the mass on the pulley made it different from other problems. So there is tension T from the rope attached to the wall, the weight force m2g, and the tension from m1 which is m1a1?
The tension will be the same throughout the rope. The only things exerting a force on m2 are: (1) the ropes; (2) gravity.

Set up an equation for each mass. (After you've found the acceleration constraint.) Then solve them together to find the accelerations.
 
ok, so I think I got it now.

a2 = (-1/2)a1

so u have for m2 in y direction:
2T-m2g=m2a2 ; since there are two ropes pulling on m2

i already know that T =m1a1 and the acceleration constraint, so plugging this in i get:
2m1a1-m2g=-m2a1/2

4m1a1-2mg=-m2a1

a1(4m1 + m2)= 2mg

a1=2mg/(4m1+m2)
does this look ok?
 
Excellent!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
10K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K