Newton's 3rd Law applied to binary stars

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Newton's 3rd Law and the Law of Universal Gravitation in a binary star system consisting of a 50 Solar mass O-type star and a 0.1 Solar mass M-type star. Participants clarify that the gravitational force exerted by each star on the other is equal, despite the significant difference in their masses. The confusion arises from the differing accelerations caused by these forces, which are influenced by the respective masses of the stars. Ultimately, the gravitational forces are equal and opposite, as dictated by Newton's laws.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's 3rd Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with the Law of Universal Gravitation
  • Basic knowledge of centripetal motion
  • Concept of mass and acceleration in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Newton's 3rd Law in various physical systems
  • Explore gravitational interactions in multi-body systems
  • Learn about centripetal acceleration and its relationship with mass
  • Investigate the dynamics of binary star systems in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, physics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in understanding gravitational interactions and dynamics in binary star systems.

Ki_Ryn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Below is a question I recently got wrong, and the (automated) feedback.

Consider a binary system with a 50 Solar mass O-type star and a 0.1 Solar mass M-type star, the O-type star is much, much more massive than the M-type star so the magnitude of the gravitational force on the O star from the M star is ( ? ) than the force on the M star from the O star.
Selected Answer: 500 times larger
Correct Answer: the same

Feedback: Incorrect, think Newton's 3rd Law and the Law of Universal Gravitation, which show that the forces must be equal.

Since the stars are in a stable configuration, I realize that the forces must be equal, but I thought that the differing gravitational forces were balanced by the centripetal forces of the orbit (the smaller star being less massive but moving faster to compensate). In the question, it asks specifically for the gravitational force. The big star is more massive and so will have a larger gravitational pull on the small star (and everything else in the universe).

This has always confused me. Can someone confirm that I'm wrong and help me understand why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
let m be small mass, M large mass, then the force is given by

F = \frac{G.m.M}{r^{2}}

this will act equal and opposite on both masses (Newtons 3rd law) however the acceleration it causes will be quite different

from the 2nd law we know F = ma so a = F/a

small mass
a = F/m = \frac{G.M}{r^{2}}

large mass
A = F/M = \frac{G.m}{r^{2}}

so the relative accelerations differ by m/M in magnitude, and in terms of centripetal motiaon with r a ~\omega^{2}.r so the radius of rotation will differ by a similar amount

anyway in conclusion the force between 2 bodies interacting through gravitation is always the equal & opposite on each body, the difference is in the acceleration caused, as the larger body has a much larger inertial resistance (mass) and vice versa
 
Ki_Ryn said:
The big star is more massive and so will have a larger gravitational pull on the small star (and everything else in the universe).

This has always confused me. Can someone confirm that I'm wrong and help me understand why?

Welcome to PF.

The force is the same.

If we pull on a rope against each other and the rope is not moving then I'm pulling with the same force that you are pulling.

In the case you cite, one may have a greater centripetal acceleration ... but they didn't ask that. They asked about the gravitational force. So yes one has greater centripetal acceleration, but the force between the bodies is the same. And Newton's Law of Gravity is based on the product of the masses divided by the radius squared. That must be the same at each end.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
969
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K