Newton's Cradle: Fascinating Momentum & Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
Newton's Cradle demonstrates the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy during collisions, provided the steel balls are identical and conditions are met. When one ball strikes, an equal number of balls move away, creating a visually captivating effect as they appear glued together. For optimal performance, both the striking and receiving balls must be stationary and in contact. If the balls are not of equal mass, the behavior of the collisions becomes less predictable and "not so nice." The direct formula for analyzing these collisions incorporates conservation laws and the coefficient of restitution, which characterizes the materials involved.
John_RB
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have always found the Newton's Cradle that my daughter bought for me fascinating. With the steel balls as identical as possible then the analysis of the process is simple. Both the momentum and kinetic energy are conserved (assuming negligible losses) on collision. The only way(?) this can occur is for the the same number of balls to move away from the collision as cause the collision; what is fascinating to me is how the balls which are hit move away as though glued together. Certain conditions must be met to get this nice simple behaviour. Both the receiving balls and the striking (raised) balls must be stationary and touching. If you do that then you can get several repeated collisions before the behaviour becomes "not so nice".
Is there an easy solution if the balls are not of equal mass and is the resulting collision always "not nice"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can use the direct formula which is based on conservation of linear momentum and Newton law of restitution (e) its a propert of colliding materials
 

Attachments

  • 20150622_115806.jpg
    20150622_115806.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 453
  • 20150622_115926.jpg
    20150622_115926.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 440
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top