Newton's Laws - Pushing on a heavy object

AI Thread Summary
Pushing against a heavy object like a mountain will exert an equal and opposite force according to Newton's Laws, but the effect on the mountain will be negligible due to its massive size. While you will push against the mountain, the displacement caused by your force will be infinitesimally small, likely around 10^-21 centimeters, making it undetectable. The presence of other forces, such as gravity and friction, further prevents any significant movement. In contrast, when jumping, your feet push against the Earth, causing both you and the Earth to move slightly apart, but again, the movement is imperceptible. Thus, while there is a reaction, the practical outcome is virtually zero displacement.
Einstein
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to understand if a really heavy object on earth, say a mountain, would move if I push it with my bare hands. This sounds absurd but according to Newton's Laws, if I push against the mountain it will exert an equal and opposite force. I understand there are other forces like gravity and friction involved but does it mean that me pushing on it will effectively move the mountain and because of the astronomical difference in the mass between me and the mountain, the effect will be infinitesimally small? or is it that there will be absolutely zero displacement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will be pushing on the mountain, which will exert a force back on you, and all you will end up doing is moving a little bit of dirt around as you hands and feet slide around. Other than the dirt there will be no displacement because the mountain is part of the ground and is held there through atomic/molecular forces. If you were both floating in space and you pushed off the mountain then both you and the mountain would begin to move apart.
 
Einstein said:
I'm trying to understand if a really heavy object on earth, say a mountain, would move if I push it with my bare hands. This sounds absurd but according to Newton's Laws, if I push against the mountain it will exert an equal and opposite force. I understand there are other forces like gravity and friction involved but does it mean that me pushing on it will effectively move the mountain and because of the astronomical difference in the mass between me and the mountain, the effect will be infinitesimally small? or is it that there will be absolutely zero displacement?

How about running this experiment on a really heavy object, in fact the most massive object on earth? That most massive object is... The Earth itself!

All you need to to do is to jump. Your feet are pushing on the earth, and the Earth is pushing back with an equal and opposite force. The force of the Earth pushing against your feet will throw you into the air (how high can you jump?). Meanwhile your feet pushing on the Earth will move it ever so slightly in the opposite direction. How slightly? Well for reasonable assumptions about your weight and strength, maybe 10-21 centimeters, which is well and thoroughly undetectable.

So to answer your question: not truly zero, but infinitesimally small.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
489
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top