Newton's Third Law in an Elevator

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces acting on a person and an elevator during ascent, specifically in relation to Newton's Third Law. Participants explore the concepts of weight, tension in the rope, normal force, and net force during different states of motion, including rest and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the weight of the combined mass of the person and elevator as 98N at rest, but questions how this changes when the elevator accelerates upwards at 3m/s², suggesting a net force of 300N.
  • Another participant corrects the weight to 980N, stating that the tension in the rope must account for both the weight and the additional force required for acceleration, leading to a tension of 1280N.
  • Some participants express confusion about why the tension is not simply the additional force of 300N, questioning the role of the normal force and how it interacts with the tension in the rope.
  • A later reply mentions that cable-driven elevators often use a counterweight, which affects the force the motor needs to apply to accelerate the elevator.
  • Participants discuss the implications of the normal force and whether it should be considered an applied force in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the exact nature of the forces involved, particularly regarding the role of the normal force and the calculation of tension in the rope. Multiple competing views remain on how these forces interact during the elevator's motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the assumptions regarding the definitions of forces involved, particularly in relation to the normal force and its contribution to the overall tension in the rope.

Sammy101
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was in an elevator the other day and I began to think about the forces acting on me and the elevator during my ascent and I became very confused.
Let's say for example that my mass and the elevator's mass combined is 100kg so this weighs 98N. When the elevator is at rest I figured that we would weigh 98N, but if the elevator began to acclerate, I think I might weigh more because there is now a net force on me and the elevator that is causing us to accelerate up at let's say 3m/s^2.
Fnet = ma
= 100kg (3m/s^2) = 300N of net force

If the opposing force is the weight of the elevator and my weight combined which is -98N, then the applied force is 398N right?

Is this 398N the tension in the rope? Or is 300N the tension in the rope since 98N is already the reaction force of the pull of weight? My main question is I understand that one pair of action reaction forces is the -98N of weight and the normal force of 98N but if the rope is pulling the elevator up for a net force, would the elevator not pull the rope down and cancel this net force? Why does the object accelerate?

Thank you!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Firstly the elevator and you have a downwards force of 980N not 98N.
So the combined force of 980+300, i.e. 1280N is the tension in the rope.

1280N upwards force is partially canceled by 980N downwards force giving a net upwards force of 300N so it accelerates upwards at 3m/s2
 
If the elevator is sitting still, the opposing force is -980N or the weight of the object and the applied force is 980N which is the normal force of the floor pushing up on the object. The net force is zero. If the elevator is accelerating at 3m/s^2 the net force is 300N because the mass of the elevator and person is 100kg.

So if the opposing force is -980N, the applied force must be 1280N. I understand that, but if the floor is already pushing up with a normal force of 980N, then would a external force only need to apply and extra 300N to cause a net force? why is the tension in the rope not just 300N? Why is it adding the normal force of the object 980N + 300N to get 1280N?
 
Sammy101 said:
So if the opposing force is -980N, the applied force must be 1280N. I understand that, but if the floor is already pushing up with a normal force of 980N, then would a external force only need to apply and extra 300N to cause a net force? why is the tension in the rope not just 300N? Why is it adding the normal force of the object 980N + 300N to get 1280N?

So what is the tension in the rope when the elevator is standing still (but suspended from the rope)?
 
Oh I think I get it it would be 980 N. So when accelerating at 3m/s^2, the tension is 1280N I get that, but does that mean that the motor pulling the elevator up is only applying 300N?
 
Sammy101 said:
does that mean that the motor pulling the elevator up is only applying 300N?
Most cable driven elevators have a counter weight that is close to the weight of the elevator, so the motor only needs to compensate for the difference in mass between elevator and load versus the counter weight and the rate of acceleration.
 
I'm sorry it sometimes takes me awhile to understand things. So, is the motor only applying 300N of force to accelerate the elevator since a force of 980N is already applied by the normal force? I am confused by the role of the opposite force of weight, the normal force, in this situation. Is it an applied force?
 
Here's a link to an elevator article with an animated diagram showing a counterweight:

elevator3.htm
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
14K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K