Chemistry Nitrogen: Atomic Number 7 & Electron Configuration

AI Thread Summary
Nitrogen, with an atomic number of 7, has 7 electrons and an electron configuration of [He] 2s2 2p3. It contains five valence electrons, which are distributed across the 2s and 2p orbitals. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately representing these valence electrons in dot diagrams, specifically how they are grouped in the sub-orbitals. There are four sub-orbitals around nitrogen, and the correct representation involves placing single dots on each of the three p orbitals. Properly illustrating these electrons is crucial for understanding nitrogen's chemical behavior.
rachelmaddiee
Messages
67
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
I need help with this
Relevant Equations
N/A
Nitrogen has an atomic number of 7. Thus, A nitrogen atom has 7 electrons. Nitrogen’s electron configuration is: [He] 2s2 2p3
The nitrogen element has five valence electrons present in 2s and 2p orbitals. So it would have five dots placed around the symbol for nitrogen.

Is this correct? I need two major problems.
CC3A793F-0C4C-4441-A783-42623041FF45.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That’s not correct for an atom of nitrogen. Only show the 5 valence electrons. Look at how they are grouped.
 
  • Like
Likes rachelmaddiee
chemisttree said:
That’s not correct for an atom of nitrogen. Only show the 5 valence electrons. Look at how they are grouped.
Yes, that’s what I’ve stated. Can you help me explain how they grouped incorrectly?
 
Dot diagrams represent the sub-orbitals in the valence shell. There are four sub-orbitals around nitrogen. How do you fill each of these sub-orbitals? How is it shown above?
 
chemisttree said:
Dot diagrams represent the sub-orbitals in the valence shell. There are four sub-orbitals around nitrogen. How do you fill each of these sub-orbitals? How is it shown above?
It has 3 p electrons so put a single dot on each three of the remaining sides
 
:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes rachelmaddiee
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top