Nitrogen inflation of car tires

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the practice of nitrogen inflation for car tires, examining its purported benefits compared to traditional air inflation. Participants explore various claims regarding performance, longevity, and safety, while considering the marketing aspects of nitrogen inflation in the context of motorsport and other applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the benefits of nitrogen inflation for regular road tires, suggesting it may be a marketing gimmick.
  • One participant notes that the only acknowledged benefit of nitrogen is its slower diffusion rate through rubber, which could mean less frequent inflation.
  • Concerns are raised about claims of better gas mileage and longer-lasting tires, with some arguing these are misleading if tires are properly maintained.
  • Participants discuss the use of nitrogen in aviation and military contexts, suggesting convenience rather than performance as the primary reason for its use.
  • Some participants share anecdotes and personal tests regarding tire pressure maintenance, questioning the validity of nitrogen's claimed advantages.
  • Humor is interspersed throughout the discussion, particularly regarding safety concerns and the perceived absurdity of certain practices related to nitrogen inflation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus among participants; multiple competing views remain regarding the efficacy and necessity of nitrogen inflation for car tires. Some participants firmly believe it is unnecessary, while others acknowledge a few potential benefits.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference previous discussions on the topic, indicating that the debate has been ongoing. There are mentions of specific claims about nitrogen's advantages that may not be universally accepted, and some participants express uncertainty about the accuracy of various statistics presented.

  • #31
I could very well be wrong about that. It's just something that was lurking the in back of my brain.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
I may be off base, here, but don't aircraft accumulate static charges just from moving through the air? Nothing to do with tires, etc, but the movement of air along the hull. They made a big deal about that in Hunt for the Red October, and Tom Clancy is usually a stickler for details.
 
  • #33
Yeah, they do. Cars as well. There's just something about tire air that I must have heard or read somewhere a long time ago. I really have no idea where I got that idea.
 
  • #34
turbo-1 said:
I may be off base, here, but don't aircraft accumulate static charges just from moving through the air? Nothing to do with tires, etc, but the movement of air along the hull. They made a big deal about that in Hunt for the Red October, and Tom Clancy is usually a stickler for details.
Indeed they do. If you get a chance to really look through an aircraft, you'll see tons of grounding straps on a lot of components, even control surfaces.

Helicopters also generate tremendous static build up.
 
  • #35
FredGarvin said:
Helicopters also generate tremendous static build up.
The bit in Hunt ... is pretty accurate, one of the things you learn on a air-sea resuce course is never to grab hold of a basket being lowered by a helicopter, let the grounding straps touch the boat first.

I assumed that especially for WW2 era prop driven planes flying at lower altitudes through weather the static build up was bad and there was a risk of sparks when the wheels touched and so having them filled with an inflammable gas was a 'theoretical' safety feature.
 
  • #36
mgb_phys said:
The bit in Hunt ... is pretty accurate, one of the things you learn on a air-sea resuce course is never to grab hold of a basket being lowered by a helicopter, let the grounding straps touch the boat first.

I assumed that especially for WW2 era prop driven planes flying at lower altitudes through weather the static build up was bad and there was a risk of sparks when the wheels touched and so having them filled with an inflammable gas was a 'theoretical' safety feature.
We would laugh a lot because every once in a while there would be someone who would be hooking up our external loads who would not use or improperly use their grounding straps. Most of the time it was a natural tendency of the person on the ground to think that they could grab one of the hooks and pull the helicopter over to where they were to make the hook up easier and faster.

Such pretty blue arcs...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
Replies
6
Views
5K