Nodal analysis with dependent voltage source

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of nodal analysis in a circuit involving a dependent voltage source. Participants question how the dependent voltage source affects the analysis of currents through the 6-ohm and 12-ohm resistors, suggesting it should influence their voltages. However, it is clarified that the external 12 V source directly sets the voltage across these resistors, making the dependent source irrelevant at that node. The conclusion emphasizes that the nodal analysis is correct, as the external source determines the potential difference across the resistors. Understanding this concept resolves the confusion regarding the role of the dependent voltage source in the analysis.
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



In attached image. Just curious as to how their nodal analysis is correct.

Homework Equations


[/B]
##I_{in} = I_{out}##

The Attempt at a Solution



Solution in image.

I am just not sure how they applied nodal analysis here to find that ##I_s = \frac{12}{12} + \frac{12}{6} + \frac{12-8}{4}##. If I'm not mistaken, they are just finding V/R, correct? But isn't the voltage in ALL the resistors dependent in some way on both the 12 V source attached and also the dependent voltage source? Why does it seem like they only included the dependent voltage only on the 4-ohm resistor? Is their solution correct?
 

Attachments

  • Photo on 2015-12-12 at 9.44 PM.jpg
    Photo on 2015-12-12 at 9.44 PM.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
Their solution is correct. If the applied independent source were changed to another value all the currents would be affected by the change, yet the resulting ratio of V/Is would turn out the same, yielding the same Rth.

Perhaps you have some doubt about how the node equation itself was written?
 
gneill said:
Their solution is correct. If the applied independent source were changed to another value all the currents would be affected by the change, yet the resulting ratio of V/Is would turn out the same, yielding the same Rth.

Perhaps you have some doubt about how the node equation itself was written?

I guess I'm just not entirely understanding why the dependent voltage source is not considered in these equations for the other 2 resistors. Doesn't this voltage source affect the true voltage across the 6- and 12-ohm resistor, thus requiring this to be included when analyzing the current passing through these resistors? It seems to me that they are considering the voltage through the 6- and 12-ohm resistor to be simply 12 V, but that doesn't appear obvious to me since there is more than one voltage source in this entire circuit.
 
TheCanadian said:
I guess I'm just not entirely understanding why the dependent voltage source is not considered in these equations for the other 2 resistors. Doesn't this voltage source affect the true voltage across the 6- and 12-ohm resistor, thus requiring this to be included when analyzing the current passing through these resistors? It seems to me that they are considering the voltage through the 6- and 12-ohm resistor to be simply 12 V, but that doesn't appear obvious to me since there is more than one voltage source in this entire circuit.
The dependent source is not connected to the node where the 6 and 12 Ohm resistors connect; The external source is. So the external source must set their currents. Nothing can alter the potential difference imposed by a fixed voltage source and in this case the 12 V source is wired directly across those resistors.
 
  • Like
Likes TheCanadian
gneill said:
The dependent source is not connected to the node where the 6 and 12 Ohm resistors connect; The external source is. So the external source must set their currents. Nothing can alter the potential difference imposed by a fixed voltage source and in this case the 12 V source is wired directly across those resistors.

So referencing node b as 0, that makes perfect sense! I was blind, and now I see! :P Thanks!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
902
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
877
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K