MHB Non-dimensional differential equation 2

ra_forever8
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Consider non-dimensional equation for the height at the highest point is given by
\begin{equation} h(\mu)= \frac{1}{\mu}- \frac{1}{\mu^2} \log_e(1+\mu) \end{equation}
$0<\mu\ll 1.$
Determine to $O(\mu)$, the (non-dimensional) time for the body to travel from the highest point to the ground, and determine an estimate for the (non-dimensional) speed of the body when it returns to the ground, again to $O(\mu)$.

=> I really don't how to start this question. please help me.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
grandy said:
Consider non-dimensional equation for the height at the highest point is given by
\begin{equation} h(\mu)= \frac{1}{\mu}- \frac{1}{\mu^2} \log_e(1+\mu) \end{equation}
$0<\mu\ll 1.$
Determine to $O(\mu)$, the (non-dimensional) time for the body to travel from the highest point to the ground, and determine an estimate for the (non-dimensional) speed of the body when it returns to the ground, again to $O(\mu)$.

=> I really don't how to start this question. please help me.

You do not have enough information to say anything about the time.
Is there some information missing from the problem statement?

Btw, this problem looks *a lot* like 2 other threads you started.
Are they perhaps all about the same problem?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top