Non-linear ODE, plane-polar coordinates.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a system of non-linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) expressed in Cartesian coordinates, which participants are attempting to convert into plane-polar coordinates. The original poster seeks to find the time derivatives of the radial and angular components, \dot{r} and \dot{\theta}.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transformation of the given equations into polar coordinates and the subsequent differentiation using the chain rule. There is a focus on how to derive \dot{r} and \dot{\theta} from the expressions for \dot{x} and \dot{y}.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various attempts to manipulate the equations to isolate \dot{r} and \dot{\theta}. Some participants suggest standard methods for combining the equations, while others express uncertainty about the steps taken and the results obtained. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the derived equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the original problem statement and are navigating through the complexities of non-linear dynamics without reaching a definitive conclusion on the values of \dot{r} and \dot{\theta}.

spitz
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have:

\dot{x}=4x+y-x(x^2+y^2)
\dot{y}=4y-x-y(x^2+y^2)

And I need to find \dot{r} and \dot{\theta}

2. The attempt at a solution

I got as far as:

\dot{x}=r(\text{sin}(\theta)-\text{cos}(\theta)(r^2-4))
\dot{y}=r(-\text{sin}(\theta)(r^2-4)-\text{cos}(\theta))

How do I go from here to \dot{r} and \dot{\theta} ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
spitz said:

Homework Statement



I have:

\dot{x}=4x+y-x(x^2+y^2)
\dot{y}=4y-x-y(x^2+y^2)

And I need to find \dot{r} and \dot{\theta}

2. The attempt at a solution

I got as far as:

\dot{x}=r(\text{sin}(\theta)-\text{cos}(\theta)(r^2-4))
\dot{y}=r(-\text{sin}(\theta)(r^2-4)-\text{cos}(\theta))

How do I go from here to \dot{r} and \dot{\theta} ?

For the left sides of these last two equations you have ##x = r\cos\theta,\ y = r\sin\theta## to work with. Remembering that everything is a function of ##t##, you can caculate ##\dot x## and ##\dot y## by differentiating those, using the chain rule.
 
Ok, so I have:

\dot{r}\cos(\theta)-r\sin(\theta)\, \dot{\theta}=r(\sin(\theta)-\cos(\theta)(r^2-4))

\dot{r}\sin(\theta)+r\cos(\theta)\dot\theta=r(-\sin(\theta)(r^2-4)-\cos(\theta))

Is there a "non-tedious" way of solving this?
 
I can't speak for what you would consider tedious but the standard method would be to multiply the first equation by cos(\theta), the second equation by sin(\theta), and add the two equations. Then turn around and multiply the first equation by sin(\theta), the second equation by cos(\theta), then subtract.
 
Thank you, sir.
 
Have I got this second part right?

HallsofIvy said:
Then turn around and multiply the first equation by sin(\theta), the second equation by cos(\theta), then subtract.

-r\sin^2(\theta)\dot{\theta}-r\cos^2(\theta)\dot{\theta}=r(sin^2(\theta)+cos^2(\theta))

-r(sin^2(\theta)+cos^2(\theta))\dot{\theta}=r

\dot{\theta}=-1
You mean, I presume, \dot{r}, not r, on the left of both of those two equations. Now, how did you get "-1" on the right of the last equation? It looks to me like you have r on the right of both first two equations. Isn't r- r= 0?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
\sin\theta\dot{x}-cos\theta\dot{y}:

\dot{r}\sin\theta\cos\theta-r\sin^2\theta\dot{\theta}-\dot{r}\sin\theta\cos\theta-r\cos^2\theta\dot{\theta}=r[\sin^2\theta+\cos^2\theta+(sin\theta\cos\theta-\sin\theta\cos\theta)(4-r^3)]

-r(\sin^2 \theta+\cos^2 \theta)\dot{\theta}=r(\sin^2 \theta+\cos^2 \theta)

-r\dot{\theta}=r

\dot{\theta}=\frac{r}{-r}=-1
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K