Nonlinear optics: second harmonic generation

eliotsbowe
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm studying basic nonlinear optics and I would like to solve a couple doubts about (basic) photon interaction.
Let a monocromatic (of frequency ω) electromagnetic field propagate through a nonlinear medium and let the third(and higher)-order terms in the relation between the polarization density P and the electric field E be negligible.
I've read* that the second harmonic generation is based on two photons of frequency ω combining to produce a photon of frequency 2ω.
I would like to understand the practical meaning of "combining" in this context: perhaps it's like "colliding"?

May anyone help me?

Thanks in advance.
*Saleh, Teich - "Foundamentals of Photonics"
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
eliotsbowe said:
Hello, I'm studying basic nonlinear optics and I would like to solve a couple doubts about (basic) photon interaction.
Basic nonlinear optics is done in the wave picture because it deals with coherent high-intensity radiation. Here and there, some handwaving photon illustrations are used but to really understand what goes on in the photon picture requires quantum optics.

Boyd's "Nonlinear Optics" is a good book which goes into the quantum mechanical details but I think he too doesn't talk in-depth about the photon picture and is more concerned with things like deriving the susceptibilities from first principles, etc.
 
Well, thanks for the tip, I'll check that book out. I kind of figured out that the subject is really hard to qualitatively depict.
 
The photon picture is easy: energy in = energy out, and momentum in = momentum out (phase matching condition).
 
UltrafastPED said:
The photon picture is easy: energy in = energy out, and momentum in = momentum out (phase matching condition).
That's the handwaving I meant. ;-) I too like this kind of reasoning, but it doesn't give you the full story.

It doesn't answer questions like: How do the photons interact with matter? What is the mechanism of the conversion? What energy levels are involved and how to calculate them?
 
Thanks for your time guys. Finally I decided to go and personally ask my professor what kind of picture he expects his students to have in mind :D
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top