Nonlinear optics: second order polarization calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the amplitude P(2ω) of the nonlinear polarization oscillating at frequency 2ω in a crystal with a refractive index of n = 2 and a second order susceptibility of χ(2) = 4×10-11 m/V. A laser beam of frequency ω with 1 W power is focused to a 30μm diameter spot. The calculated value of P(2ω) is 1.89×10-11, which is approximately four times the value of 4.7×10-11 provided in the textbook by Boyd. The discrepancy is attributed to potential differences in area calculation and the assumption of a uniform beam profile versus a Gaussian beam profile.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nonlinear optics principles
  • Familiarity with the concepts of refractive index and susceptibility
  • Knowledge of laser beam focusing and intensity calculations
  • Proficiency in numerical methods for integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Gaussian beam profile and its implications in nonlinear optics
  • Learn about numerical integration techniques for optical calculations
  • Review Boyd's Nonlinear Optics, specifically the definitions of field amplitude
  • Explore additional resources on nonlinear optical quantities and their calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in the field of optics, particularly those focusing on nonlinear optics, as well as professionals involved in laser technology and photonics.

dnp33
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
This is a problem from Boyd Nonlinear Optics chptr 1 problem 2.

Homework Statement



Numerical estimate of nonlinear optical quantities. A laser beam of frequency ω carrying 1 W of power is focused to a spot size of 30μm diameter in a crystal having a refractive index of n =2 and a second order susceptibility of \chi^{(2)}=4\times 10^{-11} m/V. Calculate numerically the amplitude P(2ω) of the component of the nonlinear polarization oscillating at frequency 2ω.

Homework Equations



P(2\omega)=\epsilon_0^{(2)}E^2
I=\frac{cn\epsilon_0}{2}E_0^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for E_0 assuming a uniform distribution across the spot, with I=P/A and got
E_0=\sqrt{\frac{2P}{Acn\epsilon_0}}
and put that into the equation I gave for P(2\omega). The value I got was 1.89\times 10^{-11}, which is almost exactly 4 times the value given in the text of 4.7\times 10^{-11}

I feel like it's possible that the value given in the text accidentally uses the diameter of the spot to calculate the area, which would give them a factor of 1/4 that I don't have, but I also thought that maybe my problem lies in my assumption that the spot is uniform. Maybe I actually need to integrate numerically assuming a gaussian beam profile-which would kind of make sense considering the problem title (numerical estimate of nonlinear optical quantities).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MerryM
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, dnp33.

Here's a possibility. Note that below (1.2.14b), Boyd (3rd edition) gives the expression for intensity as ##I = \frac{1}{2}n_0\epsilon_0c\varepsilon^2## where ##\varepsilon## is the field amplitude as defined by (1.2.12). But this definition of field amplitude differs by a factor of 2 from the field amplitude ##E## defined by (1.2.1). Note ##\varepsilon = 2E##.

Very confusing. Would have been nice if Boyd had given an explicit numerical example to help sort out the notation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K