Noob needs help understanding what is an axiom.

  • Thread starter General_Sax
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Axiom Noob
In summary, an axiom is a proposition that is not proven but considered to be self-evident or subject to necessary decision. It serves as a starting point for deducing other truths and can be created for the sake of an argument. A set of axioms, along with rules of inference, can be used to prove theorems, but the consistency of these axioms cannot be proven within the same system. To prove consistency, the logic must be embedded into a higher logic where the axioms become theorems.
  • #1
General_Sax
446
0
Wikipedia says this: "In traditional logic, an axiom or postulate is a proposition that is not proved or demonstrated but considered to be either self-evident, or subject to necessary decision. Therefore, its truth is taken for granted, and serves as a starting point for deducing and inferring other (theory dependent) truths."

I don't understand this part: "... or subject to necessary decision".

So, one can "create" an axiom that isn't self-evident? How does that work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think they just mean, you decide its true--even if just for the sake of an argument. We're getting into just the semantics of it, the important part is that an axiom is any truth taken as a priori.

An axiom doesn't have to actually be true. For instance, if we're debating the usefulness of unicorns, we might take as an axiom the existence of unicorns--just so we can discuss what we're really interested in: whether or not they're useful.
 
  • #3
General_Sax said:
I don't understand this part: "... or subject to necessary decision".

So, one can "create" an axiom that isn't self-evident? How does that work?

"Self-evident" is old fashioned, boring and uncool. "Consistency" is where it's at. You never write down just one axiom. You write several, and together with a set of rules of inference, you go ahead and prove theorems. The theorems may or may not mean anything (that is, they may or may not have an interpretation) but they can be proved with the small caveat that you can't also prove the theorem's negation. If you can, that's called a contradiction, and your whole system falls apart. Of course, sometimes that's what you want because your aim might be to show your axioms are not consistent. You can do this but can't prove your axioms are consistent unless you embed your logic into a higher logic where your axioms effectively become theorems in that higher logic (and then your "axioms" can be shown to be consistent if and only if the higher logic's axioms are consistent).

Clear?
 
Last edited:

1. What is an axiom?

An axiom is a statement or principle that is accepted as true without needing to be proven. It serves as a starting point for logical reasoning and helps to establish the foundation for a system of thought.

2. Why are axioms important in science?

Axioms are important in science because they provide a solid basis for building scientific theories and models. They allow scientists to make logical deductions and predictions based on established principles.

3. How are axioms related to scientific laws and theories?

Axioms are the fundamental building blocks of scientific laws and theories. They are the starting point from which scientists develop laws and theories, and they help to ensure that these laws and theories are logical and consistent.

4. Can axioms change over time?

Yes, axioms can change over time as new scientific discoveries and evidence emerge. Axioms are not absolute truths and are subject to revision as our understanding of the natural world evolves.

5. Are axioms the same as assumptions?

No, axioms are not the same as assumptions. While both are accepted as true without needing to be proven, axioms are generally accepted as starting points for logical reasoning, while assumptions are more speculative and may be based on limited evidence.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
54
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top