MHB Normal Approximation Problem Solving

AI Thread Summary
Mike Weir has a 20.9% chance of scoring a birdie on each hole, and he needs to birdie at least 4 out of the last 6 holes to win a PGA tournament. The discussion focuses on using the binomial probability formula to calculate the probability of this event, identifying the values of s (successes), n (trials), and p (probability of success). The normal approximation to the binomial distribution is also mentioned as a method for simplifying calculations, particularly for larger numbers of trials. Participants express uncertainty about the normal approximation and seek clarification on how to apply it alongside the binomial formula. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving the problem effectively.
Math1015
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm unsure on how to start this problem. I tried to make a tree diagram but to no avail did it help out.

Question:
On average, Mike Weir scores a birdie on about 20.9% of all the holes he plays. Mike is in contention to win a PGA golf tournament but he must birdie at least 4 holes of the last 6 holes he plays.Find the probability, as a percent correct to one decimal place, that Mike will win.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would use:

[box=blue]
Binomial Probability Formula

$$P(x)={n \choose x}p^x(1-p)^{n-x}$$[/box]

Now, suppose we want to find the probability of at least $s$ successes out of $n$ trials...so if $X$ is this event, we may write:

$$P(X)=\sum_{k=s}^{n}\left({n \choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}\right)$$

Can you identify $s,\,n,\,p$ for this problem?
 
The above approach is definitely correct for the exact answer. If you want a normal approximation then we'll use the following formula:

$$Z=\dfrac{Y-np}{\sqrt{np(1-p)}}\stackrel {d}{\longrightarrow} N(0,1)$$

I think from your class you should be able to tell us if you've covered the normal approximation to the binomial distribution yet. Once we know that, we can help you through either approach. :)

https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat414/node/179
 
I've for sure seen the binomial probability formula in class and we have covered that formula. I have not seen the other two however. The problem comes in when identifying values for each of the variables.
 
Last edited:
Math1015 said:
I've for sure seen the binomial probability formula in class and we have covered that formula. I have not seen the other two however.

I glossed over the phrase "Normal Approximation" in the thread title, and gave you the method for determining the exact answer. I do recall though, using the normal distribution to approximate the binomial distribution in the one elementary stats class I took long ago. I seem to remember only using it for much larger numbers of trials though, where using a sum such as I posted would be tedious to compute. :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top