Normalization constant for orbital wave functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The normalization constant for the wavefunction ψ(r1, r2) = (∅1s(r1) ∅1p(r2) - ∅1s(r2) ∅1p(r1)) is determined to be 1/√2. This conclusion is reached by applying the principles of orthonormality to the orbitals ∅1s and ∅1p, which are already normalized. The integration of the wavefunction's terms confirms that the first and last terms equal 1, while the middle term equals 0, leading to the final result of N² = 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wavefunctions
  • Familiarity with orthonormality in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Dirac notation and its application
  • Basic integration techniques in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of quantum mechanics related to wavefunctions
  • Learn about orthonormal orbitals and their significance in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Dirac notation and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate integration techniques used in quantum mechanical calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with wavefunctions, and anyone involved in the study of atomic and molecular structures will benefit from this discussion.

Kaiten7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have a wavefunction

ψ(r1, r2)= (∅1s(r1) ∅1p(r2) - ∅1s(r2) ∅1p(r1))

And I know that ∅1s(r1) and ∅1p(r1) are normalized. How would I go about finding the normalization constant for ψ(r1, r2)?

Everywhere I look just whips out a \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} out of nowhere:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slater_determinant
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qmech/lectures/node59.html
http://vergil.chemistry.gatech.edu/notes/intro_estruc/intro_estruc.pdf

Are a few examples

A few of those seem to mention something about orthonormal orbitals, but their definition seems to rely on Dirac notation, which I'm not that familiar with. That also means it was infuriating to find this other thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=178292, that looks like would've really helped me had I understood what the second poster said.

Currently I'm exactly where the first poster is, with

\frac{1}{N²} = \int(∅1s(r1) ∅1p(r2) - 2 \int ∅1s(r1) ∅1p(r2) ∅1s(r2) ∅1p(r1) + \int ∅1p(r2) ∅1s(r2

As I mentioned, I think I know that the first and third terms must equal 1 for some reason, and the middle one equal 0, but I don't exactly know why. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dirac's notation is "simply" (for our purpose)

<a|b>=\int_{\Omega} a^*b\, d\Omega, where a-star is the complex conjugate.

If two functions are orthonormal (in QM meaning) means that <a|b>=1 if a=b, 0 otherwise.

Now, since the function we are dealing with are orthonormal, you expression simplifies because N^2=<\psi(x_1,x_2)|\psi(x_1,x_2)>=<\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)-\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)|\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)-\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)>=\int \left[\chi_1(x_1)^*\chi_2(x_2)^*-\chi_1(x_2)^*\chi_2(x_1)^*\right]\cdot\left[\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)-\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)\right] d\Omega

From now on, it's only the application of integration rules
Dirac's formalism is more straightforward, so I'll use it, I hope you'll understand. Otherwise, tell me and I'll re-write all the stuff :
N^2=<\psi(x_1,x_2)|\psi(x_1,x_2)>=<\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)-\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)|\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)-\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)>=
<\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)|\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)-\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)>-<\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)|\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)-\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)>=
<\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)|\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)>-<\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)|\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)>-<\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)|\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)+<\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)|\chi_1(x_2) \chi_2(x_1)>
In the first and in the last terms the same terms appear at the left and the right of the |, like <a|a>. Because of orthonormality, they both account for 1.
The middle terms have different terms, like <a|b> and <b|a>, so, again, for orthonormality they account for 0.
So
N^2&lt;\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)|\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)&gt;-&lt;\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)|\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)&gt;-&lt;\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)|\chi_1(x_1)\chi_2(x_2)+&lt;\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)|\chi_1(x_2)\chi_2(x_1)&gt;=1-0-0+1=2
So the normalization constant is 1/N=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}

Hope it is clearer =)
 
It is! I think I got it now, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K