MHB Normalization of a gaussian wavefunction

skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I'm given a wavefunction (I think it's implied this is some sort of solution to the Schrodinger equation) in my quantum mechanics class, and I need to normalize it to find its constant coefficient.
So I have
$$\psi(x)=Ne^{-\frac{|x-x_o|}{2a}}$$
And the formula for normalizing this to find \(N\) would be
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\bar{\psi(x)}\psi(x){dx}=1$$
Plugging in \(\psi(x)\) gives
$$1=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}N^{2}e^{-\frac{|x-x_o|}{a}}dx$$

At first I was thinking I could just take the derivative of the exponent and divide by that to solve the integral but I realized that wouldn't work out right, and this integral behaves somewhat like a gaussian integral like when you need to integrate \(e^{-x^2}\).

I know the process of how to integrate \(e^{-x^2}\) from negative infinity to infinity (defining the integral as I and then squaring it, changing to polar coordinates, u-subbing and then taking the root of that solution to get \(\sqrt{\pi}\)) but when I tried to do that with \(\frac{|x-x_o|}{a}\) instead of \(x^2\) I end up with a weird expression in the exponent that I don't know what to do with. I was hoping changing to polar coordinates would work but I don't see how to do that with this.
Any guidance would be really appreciated! Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Separate the integral to integrate $(-\infty, x_0]$ and $[x_0, \infty)$ separately. Then the absolute value disappears, you can factor out the constant $x_0$ and are left with a standard exponential. Or is $x$ a complex number or something like that? It's been a while since my introductory quantum mechanics class.
 
I don't think we are expected to know how to work with complex variables in this class so \(x\) is probably real.
But yeah I see what you're saying, and breaking up the bounds to make two integrals will be helpful if I can figure out how to integrate this crazy integrand...
 
skatenerd said:
I don't think we are expected to know how to work with complex variables in this class so \(x\) is probably real.
But yeah I see what you're saying, and breaking up the bounds to make two integrals will be helpful if I can figure out how to integrate this crazy integrand...

With complex numbers it could probably be worked about the same since the integral would be spherically symmetric, but I wouldn't know. Anyway once you've broken it up it becomes simple because the annoying absolute values disappear, as:

$$|x - x_0| = \begin{cases}x - x_0 ~ ~ ~ \mathrm{if} ~ x > x_0 \\ x_0 - x ~ ~ ~ \mathrm{if} ~ x < x_0\end{cases}$$

Furthermore since $|x - x_0|$ is symmetric you only need to compute one side of the integral, the whole integral is just twice that.
 
Ahhh I see what you're saying now! Thanks that helps a lot, neat little trick...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top