Nose cone for rocket competition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on selecting the appropriate nose cone shape for a rocket designed to reach exactly 800 feet in altitude. Key insights reveal that while rounded nose cones are optimal for sub-sonic flight due to reduced drag, achieving the target altitude relies more on factors such as thrust, thrust duration, drag coefficients, and fin shape. A rocket simulator is recommended to analyze these variables comprehensively. The consensus is that the nose cone shape is less critical than other aerodynamic and propulsion elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rocket aerodynamics
  • Familiarity with thrust and drag coefficients
  • Knowledge of rocket simulation software
  • Basic principles of flight mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research rocket simulation tools like OpenRocket or RockSim
  • Study the effects of different fin shapes on rocket stability
  • Explore thrust duration calculations for model rockets
  • Investigate the impact of drag coefficients on rocket performance
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students participating in rocket competitions, hobbyist rocket builders, and educators teaching principles of aerodynamics and flight mechanics.

BenRichardson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello was wondering what nose cone I should put on my rocket. We need to reach around 800ft, any higher/lower and points are deducted. I don't know whether to go with a rounded cone, parabola I've seen or a pointed cone...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I could go test each however that means more work to be done in a limited time frame. I've done some research and it says rounded cones are better. Just thought I'd like to see your thoughts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BenRichardson said:

Homework Statement


Hello was wondering what nose cone I should put on my rocket. We need to reach around 800ft, any higher/lower and points are deducted. I don't know whether to go with a rounded cone, parabola I've seen or a pointed cone...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I could go test each however that means more work to be done in a limited time frame. I've done some research and it says rounded cones are better. Just thought I'd like to see your thoughts.

Welcome to the PF.

I'd think that reaching exactly 800 feet high would depend less on the nosecone shape, and more on some sort of control mechanism. Are you allowed to play out a thin wire from your rocket that is attached to the ground?
 
I know this is an old thread, but I recently encountered a similar problem. Intuitively, one would expect a pointy nose cone to have the least drag. However, it turns out that a rounded nose cone is best for sub-sonic flight. That's why you see rounded nose cones on subsonic aircraft like jet liners and cruise missiles, and pointy nose cones on supersonic jet fighters. Here is an article that shows experimental tests of altitude for the same rocket fitted with different shape nose cones.

For the problem of reaching 800 feet exactly, the nose cone is the least of your concerns. The thrust, thrust duration, overall drag coefficient, fin shape, and tail shape (for a model rocket, most of the drag comes from the rear end) all contribute to the final altitude. You need a good rocket simulator to take it all into account.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K