Not your standard '2005 in review' thread

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around notable non-discoveries and failures in astronomy during the year 2005. Participants explore various categories of events, including significant failures and serendipitous discoveries, while also suggesting a potential focus on positive achievements in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests discussing the most notable non-discoveries of 2005, prompting others to reflect on failures in the field.
  • Another participant expresses disappointment over the loss of the X-ray spectrometer, sharing personal experience related to the project.
  • There is a suggestion to also consider the best discoveries of the year, with ideas for categories that evoke strong emotional responses or memorable conversations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether to focus on failures or successes in astronomy for 2005, indicating a lack of consensus on the direction of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific events and articles, but lacks detailed context about the implications of the non-discoveries or failures mentioned.

Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,397
Reaction score
3
You can read lots of these - http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1649_1.asp", for example - I thought it might be fun to take a different view! :smile:

What were the most notable non-discoveries for 2005?

What were the most outstanding failures?

I'll go first. In the second category, I nominate http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1564_1.asp".

Oh, and one more category - what was, in 2005, the most http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=serendipity" discovery in astronomy?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Nereid, why not take the best of the year? We wade through the worst every day. You read all the papers.
 
I will second the loss of the X-ray spectrometer. I was actually interning at GSFC this summer under one of the instrument scientists involved with the project, and was there when the failure occurred. He was extremely disappointed, especially since the calibration results came back looking so great.
 
Chronos said:
Nereid, why not take the best of the year? We wade through the worst every day. You read all the papers.
Chronos, why not start your own thread on the best? I thought about it, and came up with some ideas ('which astronomy-related news item in 2005 stuck longest in your mind?', 'which caused, for you, the strongest feelings of wonder and delight, as you read it?', 'which lead to the most passionate/delightful/absorbing/{insert your favourite adjective here} conversations with co-workers, fellow students, family members, boyfriend(s)/girlfriend(s)?'). Feel free to take your pick :approve:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 126 ·
5
Replies
126
Views
35K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
623
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
7K