B What does the notation in measuring the spins of two electrons mean?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter mieral
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the notation used to describe the quantum states of two electrons measured in succession. It explains that each measurement leads to an entangled state represented by a mathematical expression that includes probabilities and spin conditions. The final evolution of the state illustrates how the measurements create four possible outcomes, each corresponding to different combinations of the spins of the two electrons. The terms in the equations represent the probabilities of measuring either spin up or spin down for each electron, along with the states of readiness and observation. The mathematical framework used in this context is related to quantum mechanics, specifically involving concepts of entanglement and probability amplitudes.
mieral
Messages
203
Reaction score
5
(posted in General Math in case this would be transferred elsewhere)

In the thread, https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/mwi-and-path-of-single-electron.900851/page-4 someone posted:

"This should be obvious; just do the same thing for subsequent measurements as we did for the initial measurements.

For example, suppose we measure the spins of two electrons (call them electrons 1 and 2) in succession, both in the up/down direction. The total evolution looks like this (hopefully the notation is clear):

## \Psi_0 = \left( a_1 \vert u_1 \rangle + b_1 \vert d_1 \rangle \right) \left( a_2 \vert u_2 \rangle + b_2 \vert d_2 \rangle \right) \vert R_1, R_2 \rangle \vert O_{R1}, O_{R2} \rangle##

##\rightarrow \Psi_1 = \left( a_2 \vert u_2 \rangle + b_2 \vert d_2 \rangle \right) \left( a_1 \vert u_1 \rangle \vert U_1, R_2 \rangle \vert O_{U1}, O_{R2} \rangle + b_1 \vert d_1 \rangle \vert D_1, R_2 \rangle \vert O_{D1}, O_{R2} \rangle \right)##

##
\rightarrow \Psi_2 = a_1 a_2 \vert u_1 \rangle \vert u_2 \rangle \vert U_1, U_2 \rangle \vert O_{U1}, O_{U2} \rangle + a_1 b_2 \vert u_1 \rangle \vert d_2 \rangle \vert U_1, D_2 \rangle \vert O_{U1}, O_{D2} \rangle \\ + b_1 a_2 \vert d_1 \rangle \vert u_2 \rangle \vert D_1, U_2 \rangle \vert O_{D1}, O_{U2} \rangle + b_1 b_2 \vert d_1 \rangle \vert d_2 \rangle \vert D_1, D_2 \rangle \vert O_{D1}, O_{D2} \rangle##

In other words, each time a measurement happens, it creates another entanglement. So after two measurements, we have an entangled state containing four terms, one corresponding to each possible combination of the results of the two measurements."

What does the notation or equations means? suppose initially we measure the spins of two electrons (call them electrons 1 and 2) in succession, both in the up/down direction.. what does the final evolution means.. what are the contents of the 4 terms?

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
btw.. a1, b1, a2, b2 are the probabilities
u1, u2 d1, d2 are the actual spin conditions
R is Ready
O is Observer

I guess I'm getting it after reading it over and over again.. what kind of math is this? differential equations?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top