Notation question: partial derivative with arrow

redrzewski
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I'm reading thru Brown's QFT.

He uses the notation of the gradient operator or a partial differentiation operater with an arrow over the operator. The arrow points either left or right.

Can someone please tell me what this means?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It just denotes if the derivative is acting to the left or the right. You can usually change this direction by integration by parts.

if the arrow is point to the left and u had f\overleftarrow{\nabla} g it really just means (\nabla f) g.

So integrating:

\int d^4x f\overleftarrow{\nabla} g= [fg]-\int d^4x f\overrightarrow{\nabla} g, providing functions go to zero at infinity (compact support), you just throw away the [] term.

Translating into conventional notation:

\int d^4x (\nabla f) g= [fg]-\int d^4x f(\nabla g)
 
Last edited:
Two more things to add:

1. The reason one wants to do this is that when using the Feynman "slash" notation, the derivative operator also carries a gamma matrix, which can't be moved to the other side of the field being differentiated.

2. A derivative with a double arrow on top means:

\alpha \overleftrightarrow {\partial_\mu} \beta = (\partial_\mu \alpha) \beta - \alpha \partial_\mu \beta

But be careful, because sometimes this is defined to mean the other way around!
 
Thank you very much for the clarification.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top