Nuclear fusion and anti-nuclear technology

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the viability of nuclear fusion as a long-term energy solution compared to traditional nuclear fission and renewable energy sources. Participants argue that while fusion technology is still in the research phase, it may not replace fossil fuels or fission plants in the near future. Concerns about nuclear waste and the historical failure to transition to renewable energy are highlighted. The conversation emphasizes the need for better energy storage solutions and the importance of basing discussions on empirical evidence rather than opinions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fission and fusion processes
  • Knowledge of renewable energy technologies, such as solar and wind
  • Familiarity with energy storage solutions and grid management
  • Awareness of nuclear waste management issues
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in nuclear fusion technology and current projects
  • Explore energy storage technologies, focusing on battery innovations
  • Investigate the environmental impacts of nuclear waste and management strategies
  • Study the effectiveness of renewable energy systems in various countries
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for energy policy makers, environmental scientists, nuclear engineers, and anyone interested in the future of energy production and sustainability.

thewowsignal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Is there any alternative to nuclear energy? Long term, nuclear energy creates more problems than solutions. For many decades mankind has been trying to develop more efficient way of producing energy and tackle nuclear waste. Many scientific teams around the world hope to make some progress in this area. Is there any chance for nuclear fussion technology to power our homes and businesses in the near future? Is there any chance for nuclear power plants to become obsolete?
I want to start a serious discussion here about our future on this small planet. This thread is especially dedicated to those of you, who are enthusiastic about atomic energy and energy crisis.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
thewowsignal said:
Long term, nuclear energy creates more problems than solutions.
Does it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
thewowsignal said:
Is there any alternative to nuclear energy?
A lot of renewables or renewables plus a lot of energy storage should work in most places. The transition won't be cheap, however.
thewowsignal said:
Long term, nuclear energy creates more problems than solutions.
It doesn't.

Fusion (which is nuclear power, too) could get a significant share towards the end of the century, but it won't be the replacement for fossil fuels in most places. It could replace fission nuclear power plants and/or renewables.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
For many decades many people talk about renewable energy. Not much was done to this very day, I have not doubt that many of those educated and talking heads in fact want the opposite. There was a very good time about thirty years ago to boost renewable energy revolution, but it all failed, for some reason. I know there are a few small countries, which are based on renewables, like wind turbines, solar panels, etc. But I think it is rather a joke and a cover rather than a real long-term solution. The way people live their lives makes their countries not renewable in terms of energy consumption.

Nuclear power plants are no long-term solution, in my opinion. I am neither a scientist nor an expert, but I realize that nuclear waste has always been a huge problem. The technology used for decades is by definition not renewable. Nuclear energy must become obsolete one day for "homo sapiens" to survive on such a small planet in enormously big Universe.

In my opinion a couple of fusion reactors are already under construction and will be operational soon, to tackle constantly growing global energy crisis.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy, malawi_glenn and Motore
There are no fusion power plants currently under construction. It is still a research topic.

Without better batteries and transmission than we have now, most grids require some “fueled” power generation to meet surge/peak/nighttime demand.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and russ_watters
thewowsignal said:
In my opinion a couple of fusion reactors are already under construction and will be operational soon
How can this be an opinion?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, topsquark, russ_watters and 2 others
First, we already have a thread on this. It's named, The Nuclear Power Thread. Don't know how much easier to find one could make it.

Second, we have "serious discussion" and "I am no[t] an expert". How is this going to work exactly? We allow one non-expert only, and that non-expert can spout off ill-informed opinions, but everybody else needs to be serious?

Finally we have "opinions" which are empirically verifiable. As they say "everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FinBurger, hutchphd, topsquark and 3 others
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and malawi_glenn
thewowsignal said:
TL;DR Summary: Is there any alternative to nuclear energy? Long term, nuclear energy creates more problems than solutions. For many decades mankind has been trying to develop more efficient way of producing energy and tackle nuclear waste. Many scientific teams around the world hope to make some progress in this area. Is there any chance for nuclear fussion technology to power our homes and businesses in the near future? Is there any chance for nuclear power plants to become obsolete?

I want to start a serious discussion here about our future on this small planet. This thread is especially dedicated to those of you, who are enthusiastic about atomic energy and energy crisis.

After a Mentor discussion, this thread will remain closed.

@thewowsignal -- please keep in mind that thread starts in the technical PF forums need to be based on the mainstream literature, not opinions, and you should always include links to reputable sources when starting threads in the technical forums. Also realize that there is the existing Nuclear Power thread that was pointed out to you already. General comments about Nuclear Power may best fit in that thread, but to the extent that you want to discuss a different or more specific aspect of Nuclear Power, you can start a new thread in the Nuclear Engineering forum as long as you include reputable references that you have been reading, and ask specific questions about those references. Thanks.

And thank you to the other posters in this thread who tried to help the OP. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, Wrichik Basu, Bystander and 4 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K