- #1
joe_blogs
- 4
- 0
Hi all,
I'm doing some test prep for a Nuclear Physics course and working on a past paper. I've attached a photo of the question. The diagram is 3.19 in Krane. The course is based on Krane, and so the relevant chapter is Chp 5: Nuclear Models.
Problem description
The problem is to explain the energy level spacing for a series of nuclei based on some basic nuclear models. I can do some of them - e.g. 120Te and 178Os show the regularity and spin-parity combinations expected for rotational and vibrational nuclei respectively.
What I'm stuck on is the slightly bizarre level scheme for 182Ta. There appear to be over 40 levels under 1MeV, and I don't understand why. It's a pretty vague question, but I assume any answer should explain the character of the level scheme - i.e. it's great complexity.
My attempted solution
I know that nuclei in the 150<A<190 range are deformed and often have level schemes characterized by rotational bands, and that explanations of level schemes often build together multiple explanations. e.g. p146 in Krane, the levels of 164Er are partially explained by appealing to three rotational bands, built on a deformed ground-state and two vibrational states.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
Joe
I'm doing some test prep for a Nuclear Physics course and working on a past paper. I've attached a photo of the question. The diagram is 3.19 in Krane. The course is based on Krane, and so the relevant chapter is Chp 5: Nuclear Models.
Problem description
The problem is to explain the energy level spacing for a series of nuclei based on some basic nuclear models. I can do some of them - e.g. 120Te and 178Os show the regularity and spin-parity combinations expected for rotational and vibrational nuclei respectively.
What I'm stuck on is the slightly bizarre level scheme for 182Ta. There appear to be over 40 levels under 1MeV, and I don't understand why. It's a pretty vague question, but I assume any answer should explain the character of the level scheme - i.e. it's great complexity.
My attempted solution
I know that nuclei in the 150<A<190 range are deformed and often have level schemes characterized by rotational bands, and that explanations of level schemes often build together multiple explanations. e.g. p146 in Krane, the levels of 164Er are partially explained by appealing to three rotational bands, built on a deformed ground-state and two vibrational states.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
Joe
Attachments
Last edited: