Nuclear or Mechanical Engineering?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison between Nuclear Engineering and Mechanical Engineering as degree options, particularly in relation to their relevance in the energy sector and job prospects. Participants explore the nature of the physics involved in each field, the flexibility of the degrees, and personal preferences regarding career paths.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Nuclear Engineering is perceived as "cooler" due to its association with advanced physics topics like Quantum Mechanics and Electrodynamics, while others argue that Mechanical Engineering also involves significant physics, albeit of a different kind.
  • There is a discussion about the job prospects in Nuclear Engineering compared to Mechanical Engineering, with some expressing concern that Nuclear may have fewer opportunities.
  • Participants note that both degrees cover similar foundational courses, especially in the early years, but diverge in specialized topics later on.
  • Some contributions highlight that the application of physics in Nuclear Engineering varies significantly depending on the specialty, with some roles requiring less physics than others.
  • One participant mentions the importance of considering interdisciplinary knowledge, such as materials science and electrical engineering, regardless of the chosen path.
  • There are differing opinions on the relevance of certain advanced physics topics in Nuclear Engineering, with one participant stating that some topics may not be essential for all roles within the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions about the appeal and practicality of each engineering discipline, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on which degree is definitively better for entering the energy sector.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the variability in course content and job roles within both fields, suggesting that individual experiences may differ significantly based on specialty and personal interests.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a degree in engineering, particularly those interested in the energy sector or the specific fields of Nuclear and Mechanical Engineering.

6eecs
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
My school has a BS degree for both. Although Nuclear seems more cool and involves more physics, Mechanical Engineering seems like a more flexible degree. I'm interested in getting a job in the energy sector (not necessarily nuclear power plant design/reactor design), or in technical consulting.

What is your opinion on this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nuclear engineering deals primarily with the designing and upkeep of nuclear power systems (ie. nuclear reactors). Mechanical Engineering deals with (typically) smaller scale components of those larger systems and the integration of those components (rather than the design of that large system in its entirety. Again, these are generalizations, and there's always exceptions and ways to move around since an engineering degree in general will enable you as an individual with the ability to make educated assumptions and try to learn about a system if necessary.

I suppose a few questions to ask are: Why do you think Nuclear is more 'cool'? What defines 'cool' for you as an objective for your future work? I can tell you as an undergraduate in mechanical, there's certainly no lack in applied physics. It's just a different 'kind' of physics. A lot of what you'll get in your later junior year/senior year is where you begin to specialize into your discipline typically. In my intro. modern physics class, we got a brief overview of what nuclear engineering is about. It certainly is interesting, but to me (nuclear engineers speak up and tell me otherwise please!) it felt like the only end-game (which wouldn't be a bad position) would be in plant design/upkeep. I'm just a more mechanical/aerospace oriented sort of guy. That's not to say nuclear physics isn't interesting; again, it's a large portion of the energy we use daily and could grow as a source of power.

If you're interested in energy, nuclear certainly is an option; but I think 'energy sector' is kind of vague. Have you thought about materials science or chemical engineering? Materials science engineering has plenty of applications directly to energy (think solar cells and materials processing-->designing/implementing less pollutive materials. Chemical engineering (from what I know, which isn't very in depth) is similar to nuclear, but without the nuclear (i.e. like designing chemical processing plants and water treatment facilities, etc).

I don't know if electrical engineering or some other kind of degree at your university would deal with power transmission, but the distribution of electricity is an incredible problem in the energy sector as well.

Anyway, just my $0.02. If you're really undecided, most universities will let you take an undecided engineering major for a bit (or let you easily switch up to a year or so into your program; give or take). I recommend e-mailing your academic advisor (if you have one), and getting a better idea of the majors offered and the little spins your university throws on them. You might be surprised at the different courses you can take later on across majors.
 
I'm actually declared mechanical engineering, but the physics involved seems a little bit basic/repetitive of high school (I'm taking an sophomore level engineering mechanics class and a thermo class). While things can get ugly on psets and stuff, they aren't really enlightening-elegant.

I think nuclear is more "cool" because it would involve more interesting physics topics: Quantum Mechanics, (maybe some special relativity? Cerenkov radiation etc...), Electrodynamics/magnetohydrodynamics, and Statistical Mechanics (as opposed to thermo maybe). I'm just concerned the job prospects aren't as good as MechE. I'm not interested in ChemE, and EE abstracts away too much of the physics.

Oh, BTW, I greatly enjoyed reading your post, it was very informative.
 
Nuclear Engineering involves some knowledge of physics, particularly nuclear physics, but the use of 'physics' will depend on one's specialty. Working with cross-section libraries and neutron interaction, or radiation effects would indeed involve quite a lot of physics. On the other hand, doing core design or working in operations will not necessarily involve a lot of physics, and certainly not QM, electrodynamics/magnetohydrodynamics, or Stat Mech.

Similar, there are specialties in Mechanical Engineering where one would use a lot of physics or chemical physics, and others that don't.

Besides, Nuclear Engineering typcially includes a fair amount of topics from Mechanical Engineering, e.g., thermodynamics and heat transfer, fluid mechanics, mechanics of materials, . . . . In addition, for either NE or ME, one should probably consider a few courses in materials science/engineering. In addition, one would probably be exposed to introductory topics in EE, e.g., circuit analysis and electromechanics, and control theory.

Whether one pursues ME or NE, try to be as diverse as possible. One hot area now is 'multiphysics simulation'.
 
Hi, l want to know more on how to calculate members of forces present in truses
 
In my experience nuclear and mechanical engineers take the exact same classes for most of school. In the last two years mechanical engineers will take machine design/vibrations/etc while nuclear engineers will take nuclear physics/core design/effects of radiation on materials/etc.

Do some research into the class schedules of both degrees, find the syllabus for each course, look in the library for the required text and get a feel for what you will be learning. Choose which path interests you more. If you maintain a decent GPA you will not have any trouble at all finding a job with either degree.

As for "Electrodynamics/magnetohydrodynamics" I've never heard of those and I recently graduated from with a nuclear engineering degree. "statistical mechanics" I took a class in this but it was an elective and I definitely will never be using it. We had to take an intro to quantum mechanics class, but I don't really think it's important for nuclear engineering.

IMO the most advanced physics you will learn in NucE is related to neutron transport theory see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_transport

You will learn how to do simplified scenarios by hand and later how to use computer codes to do the calculations for you for more realistic scenarios.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K