Number of KCL and KVL equations for branch-current method

  • Thread starter Thread starter edsoneicc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kcl Kvl Method
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in solving a circuit problem involving multiple unknowns. Participants explore how to determine the appropriate number of KCL and KVL equations needed to solve for the unknown currents and voltages in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) seeks to find the number of KCL and KVL equations required for a circuit with 6 unknowns, proposing 4 KCL equations and 2 KVL equations but encountering a math error.
  • Some participants suggest introducing new variables to account for voltage drops and recommend writing additional KVL equations around combined loops.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between currents, specifically that i4 is linearly dependent on ix, which raises questions about the necessity of certain KCL equations.
  • Participants debate the terminology used, particularly regarding the distinction between mesh and loop analysis, and whether the OP's restrictions on methods are appropriate.
  • One participant emphasizes that KCL and KVL can be used in various methods, including mesh and nodal analysis, despite the OP's claim that these methods are not allowed.
  • Another participant notes that applying KCL to N-1 nodes and KVL to B - N + 1 loops can simplify the equations needed for the solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the number of equations needed and the appropriateness of using certain methods. There is no consensus on the best approach to take, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal set of equations to use.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight potential dependencies among the variables, suggesting that certain equations may not be independent. The discussion also touches on the limitations of the OP's understanding of circuit analysis methods.

edsoneicc
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find ix and Valpha
2rdwz7c.jpg
[/B]

Homework Equations


KCL
KVL

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]How do I determine the number of KCL and KVL equations? In this problem I am solving, there are 6 unknowns so I need 6 equations. I can write 4 independent KCL equations, 1 KVL at loop 1(to include the Valpha variable) and 1 KVL at loop 4. But these 6 equations result to math error on my solver. Is this because Valpha appeared only once in all equation? Can I also KVL on combined loop 2 and 3 to produce another equation with Valpha?

TL;DR
4 KCL equations, KVL at loop 1, KVL at loop 4 = math error
Should I use 4 KCL, KVL at loop 1, KVL at combined loop 2 and 3?

Also, in solving circuits using KCL and KVL only(mesh and nodal not allowed yet), is it possible to use different sets of equation to solve circuits?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you write KVL for loop 1? That is, how did you treat the voltage across the ##3 i_x## current source? If you just called the voltage across that whole branch ##v_{\alpha}## then it doesn't take into account the effect of the 10 Ohm resistor in the branch.

What I would suggest doing is to introduce a new variable, say ##v_x##, as the unknown potential drop across the ##3 i_x## current source. That let's you write an expression for ##v_{\alpha}## in terms of this new voltage and the potential drop across the 10 Ohm resistor. Replace the ##v_{\alpha}## in the controlled current source with this expression, too, so ##v_{\alpha}## disappears for now.

Then you can write KVL for Loop 1, Loop 4, and around the perimeter of Loop 2+3 (so you don't pass though the 8 A current source and have to introduce yet another unknown voltage). Then write KCL for each node. That should give you a total of 7 equations. With 6 unknowns ##(i_1, i_2, i_3, i_4, i_x, v_x)## you need to pick 6 equations out of the seven.

When you choose the right one to leave out the resulting matrix will have a determinant that is nonzero. In other words, one of the equations will turn out to not be independent. I find that a reasonable approach is to choose equations so that every column has at least two entries. (Each column represents one of the unknown variables, so you want all of the variables to appear in at least two of the equations).
 
edsoneicc said:
Also, in solving circuits using KCL and KVL only(mesh and nodal not allowed yet), is it possible to use different sets of equation to solve circuits?

What do you mean, "...mesh and nodal not allowed yet.". You are in fact writing mesh equations. If you must avoid mesh (loop) and nodal methods, about the only thing left is to solve branch equations. And, of course, all these methods use KCL and KVL, so saying "solve circuits using KCL and KVL" doesn't imply the use of any particular one of branch, mesh, loop, or nodal methods.
 
The Electrician said:
What do you mean, "...mesh and nodal not allowed yet.". You are in fact writing mesh equations. If you must avoid mesh (loop) and nodal methods, about the only thing left is to solve branch equations. And, of course, all these methods use KCL and KVL, so saying "solve circuits using KCL and KVL" doesn't imply the use of any particular one of branch, mesh, loop, or nodal methods.
Mesh analysis uses virtual mesh currents which do not necessarily correspond to any real current in the circuit. Nodal analysis assumes node potentials with respect to some reference node. If these methods have not yet been introduced then one is left with assigning individual branch currents for writing loop equations (KVL) and summing branch currents at nodes (KCL).

Usually the "raw" branch current method with KVL loops is introduced first, then the slightly more sophisticated versions of mesh and nodal analysis are built upon them.
 
gneill said:
Mesh analysis uses virtual mesh currents which do not necessarily correspond to any real current in the circuit. Nodal analysis assumes node potentials with respect to some reference node. If these methods have not yet been introduced then one is left with assigning individual branch currents for writing loop equations (KVL) and summing branch currents at nodes (KCL).

Usually the "raw" branch current method with KVL loops is introduced first, then the slightly more sophisticated versions of mesh and nodal analysis are built upon them.
What I'm complaining about is the OP's statement: "Also, in solving circuits using KCL and KVL only(mesh and nodal not allowed yet)". This makes it sound like something more than KCL and KVL is needed for a mesh or nodal solution; does the student think something more is needed? Mesh and nodal analyses can be carried out using only KCL and KVL, so restricting the solution to using only KCL and KVL doesn't rule out those methods.

I wish the student who asks for help here, and is required to use a particular method to solve a network, would say what that method is. If it's the branch current method, then say he has to use the branch current method. Saying that he has to use KCL and KVL only, doesn't really tell us what method must be used, and certainly doesn't rule out mesh and nodal analysis.

In addition to helping solve a network, we can also help the student use good descriptive language.

I wonder if his studies up to this point have made a distinction between a loop and a mesh. Does he know that when he sums the voltages around a loop, he is also summing voltages around a mesh? That's what I meant when I said he is writing "mesh" equations, using the word "mesh" in a general sense, synonymous with "loop" in this case.

The OP's network is planar, and all the loops are also exterior meshes, so that the "mesh" currents, corresponding to the possibly virtual currents in the formal mesh current analysis method, are all real currents in this case. Not that it's relevant to the branch current method solution of this network, but it's something every student should know about planar networks.
 
edsoneicc said:
TL;DR
4 KCL equations, KVL at loop 1, KVL at loop 4 = math error

Note that i4 and ix are linearly dependent. In other words, i4 is carrying the same information as ix. Don't use the KCL equation at node C.

Write 3 KCL equations at nodes A, B and D.

Write three KVL equations, around loop 1, loop4, and around the outside of loop 2 and 3. Just keep Vα as Vα.

The 10 ohm resistor is in series with a current source, so it isn't involved in the solution.
 
I see. Why is i4 carrying the same info as ix? I'm a bit confused.

Also, what I meant was using mesh currents(mesh analysis) and nodal voltages(nodal analysis) were not to be used in this analysis. That's why we had to assign currents for each branch. I'm having a hard time expressing my thoughts in English :)
 
edsoneicc said:
I see. Why is i4 carrying the same info as ix? I'm a bit confused.

If you write the KCL equation for node C, it is "i4 = 8 - 3 ix". If you know i4, you also know ix. i4 is linearly dependent on Ix, and vice versa.

Have you tried solving the 6 equations I suggested you use?
 
I'd just like to note: You need to apply KCL to ##N-1## nodes, or KVL to ##B - N + 1## loops.

##B## are the branches, ##N## are the nodes.

Many equations can be simplified using the formalisms of nodal and mesh analysis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
782
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K