Number of Molecules vs Velocity: Finding N for v > v_0

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the number of gas molecules with velocities greater than a specified threshold velocity \( v_0 \). Participants explore mathematical approaches to this problem, including integrals and the implications of continuous versus discrete distributions of molecular velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the integral \( \int_{v_{0}}^{\infty} N(v)\,dv \) to find the number of molecules with \( v > v_0 \).
  • Another participant points out that the integral has dimensions of velocity times number of molecules, which raises questions about its validity.
  • A different viewpoint introduces the function \( N(v) = e^{-v^{2}} \) to illustrate that a finite integral can exist if the number of molecules decreases rapidly enough with increasing velocity.
  • Some participants argue about the units of \( N \), with one asserting that \( N \) must have units of [number of molecules] and another suggesting it represents a number density.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of continuous versus discrete representations of molecular counts, with references to probability and cumulative distributions.
  • One participant presents the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution as a historical context for the problem, providing a formula for the speed distribution of gas molecules.
  • Another participant proposes that if \( N_0 \) is treated as an integer, the graph should represent a histogram of molecular speeds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of \( N \) (whether it is a density or a count) and the validity of the integral approach. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the problem or the appropriate mathematical treatment.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations regarding the assumptions made about the nature of \( N \), the treatment of continuous versus discrete distributions, and the implications of integrating over an infinite range of velocities.

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have a graph with velocity of a gas v on the x-axis and number of molecules N on the y-axis, how would I find the number of molecules with v>v_0, where v_0 is a given velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about

$$\int_{v_{0}}^{\infty}N(v)\,dv?$$
 
Ackbach said:
How about

$$\int_{v_{0}}^{\infty}N(v)\,dv?$$

But that has dimensions vxN.

As stated, the answer to the problem is infinity since we have to consider infinitely many velocities. (Note that I have a continuous distribution.) So I guess we cannot have such a graph.
 
You're right about the units. I'll have to rethink that. However, you're not correct about infinities. What if $N(v)=e^{-v^{2}}?$ Note that $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}N(v)\,dv=\sqrt{\pi}$, in that case. You can definitely have a finite integral, if the number of molecules with a given velocity drops off fast enough.
 
I have it, I think. Your function $N$ does not have units of [number of molecules]. It has units of [number of molecules]/[v]. So the [v]'s will cancel out in the integration. You're integrating a density function. So, I think that
$$\int_{v_{0}}^{\infty}N(v)\,dv$$
still works. And if your $N(v)$ is to be at all realistic, it must die off fast enough for the integral to converge, since we believe there are a finite number of molecules in the universe!
 
Ackbach said:
I have it, I think. Your function $N$ does not have units of [number of molecules]. It has units of [number of molecules]/[v]. So the [v]'s will cancel out in the integration. You're integrating a density function. So, I think that
$$\int_{v_{0}}^{\infty}N(v)\,dv$$
still works. And if your $N(v)$ is to be at all realistic, it must die off fast enough for the integral to converge, since we believe there are a finite number of molecules in the universe!

But I told you that N has units of [number of molecules]. With all due respect, N having units of [number of molecules]/[v] doesn't make any sense. Pretty sure you're mistaken.
 
Alexmahone said:
But I told you that N has units of [number of molecules]. With all due respect, N having units of [number of molecules]/[v] doesn't make any sense. Pretty sure you're mistaken.

On a continuous graph N cannot be a number it must be a number density.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
On a continuous graph N cannot be a number it must be a number density.

CB

What do you mean by number density?
 
Last edited:
If N is continuous then P[N=a] for any a is 0, so it can only be considered between a range of values.

As I understand the situation you are trying to create, the x-axis is continuous and the y-axis is discrete so for any $N_i$ there should be a corresponding range of velocities [math]v_a<v_i<v_b=N_i[/math]. However, N can't realistically be non-integer though unless molecule means something different than I've ever seen.
 
  • #10
Alexmahone said:
What do you mean by number density?

Number of molecule in a unit speed interval (or rather \( \lim_{\Delta v\to 0} N(v-\Delta v/2, v+\Delta v/2)/ \Delta v \) where \( N(v-\Delta v/2, v+\Delta v/2) \) denotes the number in the speed range \((v-\Delta v/2, v+\Delta v/2) \) )

CB
 
  • #11
An alternative type of data presentation where the vertical scale is number is a cumulative number plot, where against speed v we plot the total number (or fraction) with speed less than or equal to v.

This gives a plot that is independedent of assumptions about discrete or continuous (or for that matter mixed continuous and discrete) distributions (one has steps, the other does not).

CB
 
  • #12
Alexmahone said:
Suppose I have a graph with velocity of a gas v on the x-axis and number of molecules N on the y-axis, how would I find the number of molecules with v>v_0, where v_0 is a given velocity?

The speed distribution of the molecules of a gas with absolute temperature T has been found by Maxwell and Boltzmann about hundred and fifty years ago...

$\displaystyle f(v)= \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}\ (\frac{m}{K\ T})^{3}}\ v^{2}\ e^{- \frac{m\ v^{2}}{2\ K\ T}}$ (1)

... where m is the mass of a single molecule and K is the 'Boltzmann's constant'. If N is the global number of molecules, the the number of molecules with $\displaystyle v> v_{0}$ is given by...

$\displaystyle N_{0}= N\ \int_{v_{0}}^{\infty} f(v)\ dv$ (2)

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #13
chisigma said:
The speed distribution of the molecules of a gas with absolute temperature T has been found by Maxwell and Boltzmann about hundred and fifty years ago...

$\displaystyle f(v)= \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}\ (\frac{m}{K\ T})^{3}}\ v^{2}\ e^{- \frac{m\ v^{2}}{2\ K\ T}}$ (1)

... where m is the mass of a single molecule and K is the 'Boltzmann's constant'. If N is the global number of molecules, the the number of molecules with $\displaystyle v> v_{0}$ is given by...

$\displaystyle N_{0}= N\ \int_{v_{0}}^{\infty} f(v)\ dv$ (2)

Of course in the formula (2) You consider $N_{0}$ as continuous variable and is $\displaystyle N_{0}= N\ P \{v>v_{0}\}$. In case You intend to consider $N_{0}$ as an integer, then the x-y diagram must be an histogram where on the X axis is reported an integer k and on the Y axis is reported the number of molecules $N_{k}$ having speed $\displaystyle k\ v_{u} \le v< (k+1)\ v_{u}$. In this case the number of molecules having speed $\displaystyle > v_{0}$ is...

$\displaystyle N_{0}= \sum_{k= \text{int} \frac{v_{0}}{v_{u}}} ^ {\infty} N_{k}$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
490
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K