Numerical integration of Bethe formula in Excel: help

Click For Summary
A PhD student in geology is seeking assistance with a spreadsheet used to integrate the Bethe formula for estimating alpha particle range in quartz. The student reports that the Bragg curve in Excel continuously rises without showing the expected decline, despite the stopping distance appearing reasonable. The issue may stem from the Bethe-Bloch formula providing inaccurate results for low energy ranges (βγ<0.03) and the need for energy loss to be zero once the energy reaches zero. The student is looking for help to identify the mistake in the spreadsheet, offering credit in their thesis as a reward. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the formula and understanding energy loss behavior in particle physics.
Moho
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a PhD student in geology in need of help from a physicist! Can somebody spot the mistake in my spreadsheet?

I am using an Excel spreadsheet (attached .xls) to integrate the Bethe formula in order to estimate the range (in cm) of alpha particles in quartz. I am using the version of the formula given in Groom and Klein's "Passage of Particles through Matter": http://pdg.lbl.gov/2009/reviews/rpp2009-rev-passage-particles-matter.pdf (but ignoring the density effect correction because I am not interested in high energies).

In Excel, I can plot the Bragg peak (dE/dX against x) or the energy of the alpha particle (E against x). Something is very wrong: the Bragg curve just goes up and up and never comes down again (don't be misled by Excel plotting #NUM! as 0). I would expect dE/dX to start out at something like 500 and then smoothly increase up to the peak (like the Bragg peaks in Google image search).

I must be doing something right, though, because it looks as if the stopping distance is going to be close to what I would expect (about 0.04 cm).

Can anybody find the problem in the attached spreadsheet? Reward: credit in my thesis acknowledgments!

Many thanks!

Moho
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
For low energy (βγ<0.03), the Bethe-Bloch formula gives wrong results, as shown in figure 27.1 in the pdf.
Apart from that: After the energy is 0, the energy loss should be 0 as well, giving a nice Bragg peak.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K