NuScale Modular Reactor gets NRC certification

Click For Summary
NuScale Power has received NRC certification for its 50 MW modular reactor, allowing utilities to reference this design in power plant applications. The modular concept aims to potentially lower nuclear power plant costs through production scale and standardized installations, although its effectiveness remains uncertain. Each module can produce 50 MWe, enabling flexible plant designs ranging from 100 MWe to larger capacities. The smaller Emergency Planning Zones (EPZ) associated with these modular reactors could enhance safety, but concerns about co-located units persist following the Fukushima incident. The future of single-unit nuclear plants is in question, as many have been shut down or sold to larger utilities over the past few decades.
gleem
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Messages
2,712
Reaction score
2,191
NuScale Power a startup company whose product is a modular reactor of 50 MW has received NRC certification so utilities can reference this reactor in their application to build a power plant using this design.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/t...A16zG60?cvid=aea9bfdb3d5c4073b75f973c2004c008

The question remains can this modular concept reduce the cost of nuclear power plants by production scale and standardization of installations?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters, dlgoff and anorlunda
Engineering news on Phys.org
gleem said:
NuScale Power a startup company whose product is a modular reactor of 50 MW has received NRC certification so utilities can reference this reactor in their application to build a power plant using this design.
Each module produces 50 MWe, and so plants could be designed for 600 MWe (12 modular units), or larger.

gleem said:
The question remains can this modular concept reduce the cost of nuclear power plants by production scale and standardization of installations?
Too early to tell. In theory, one can get up one or two modules very quickly, and add over time.

One could build a small 100 MWe plant (2 modules), 200 MWe (4 modules), and so on. I don't know what the installation process looks like yet. For example, can existing modules operate during installation of the new units?

One supposed benefit of the NuScale modular plant is the smaller Emergency Planning Zones (EPZ), since the modules in theory were accident-resistant or accident toleration (I don't really know where they are with that). However, the Fukushima accident raised issues of co-located units, which is an issue for multi unit plants.
NRC Ref for EPZ: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/emerg-preparedness/about-emerg-preparedness/planning-zones.html

Over the past three or so decades, most single unit nuclear plants (NPPs) have shutdown. Those existing single units have been sold off to larger utilities like Exelon and Entergy.
 
Thread 'Creating the geometry using MNCPX VisEd'
I'm working on the MSFR design and want to calculate keff. I'm trying to use the MNCPX VisEd program included with MCNP 6.1 to create my geometry. The reactor I'm designing doesn't contain fuel rods or moderator structures. The molten salt fuel circulates within the cylindrical reactor core. I'm having problems creating the geometry using MNCPX VisEd. VisEd allows for easy drawing of nested sphere, cylinder, or rectangular prism cells. However, when you want to draw a torus section within...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
7K