NuScale Modular Reactor gets NRC certification

AI Thread Summary
NuScale Power has received NRC certification for its 50 MW modular reactor, allowing utilities to reference this design in power plant applications. The modular concept aims to potentially lower nuclear power plant costs through production scale and standardized installations, although its effectiveness remains uncertain. Each module can produce 50 MWe, enabling flexible plant designs ranging from 100 MWe to larger capacities. The smaller Emergency Planning Zones (EPZ) associated with these modular reactors could enhance safety, but concerns about co-located units persist following the Fukushima incident. The future of single-unit nuclear plants is in question, as many have been shut down or sold to larger utilities over the past few decades.
gleem
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
2,171
NuScale Power a startup company whose product is a modular reactor of 50 MW has received NRC certification so utilities can reference this reactor in their application to build a power plant using this design.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/t...A16zG60?cvid=aea9bfdb3d5c4073b75f973c2004c008

The question remains can this modular concept reduce the cost of nuclear power plants by production scale and standardization of installations?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters, dlgoff and anorlunda
Engineering news on Phys.org
gleem said:
NuScale Power a startup company whose product is a modular reactor of 50 MW has received NRC certification so utilities can reference this reactor in their application to build a power plant using this design.
Each module produces 50 MWe, and so plants could be designed for 600 MWe (12 modular units), or larger.

gleem said:
The question remains can this modular concept reduce the cost of nuclear power plants by production scale and standardization of installations?
Too early to tell. In theory, one can get up one or two modules very quickly, and add over time.

One could build a small 100 MWe plant (2 modules), 200 MWe (4 modules), and so on. I don't know what the installation process looks like yet. For example, can existing modules operate during installation of the new units?

One supposed benefit of the NuScale modular plant is the smaller Emergency Planning Zones (EPZ), since the modules in theory were accident-resistant or accident toleration (I don't really know where they are with that). However, the Fukushima accident raised issues of co-located units, which is an issue for multi unit plants.
NRC Ref for EPZ: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/emerg-preparedness/about-emerg-preparedness/planning-zones.html

Over the past three or so decades, most single unit nuclear plants (NPPs) have shutdown. Those existing single units have been sold off to larger utilities like Exelon and Entergy.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top