News Obama quits Chicago church after long controversy

[Evo]

Pfleger also has made contributions to Obama (D-Ill.), and his church programs have received thousands of dollars in state earmarks championed by Obama when he was a state lawmaker.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/05/30/chicago_cardinal_criticizes_re.html?hpid=topnews

While these two actions "alone" wouldn't raise eyebrows. I want to see how many churches Obama earmarked money for that never contributed to him. I want to see that for all candidates. I think that will be a "real" teller of what kind of politicians we are dealing with.

Statement of Cardinal Francis George concerning remarks of
Fr. Michael Pfleger about Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton during
an address at Trinity United Church of Christ on Sunday May 25, 2008

The Catholic Church does not endorse political candidates. Consequently, while a priest must speak to political issues that are also moral, he may not endorse candidates nor engage in partisan campaigning.

Racial issues are both political and moral and are also highly charged. Words can be differently interpreted, but Fr. Pfleger’s remarks about Senator Clinton are both partisan and amount to a personal attack. I regret that deeply.

To avoid months of turmoil in the church, Fr. Pfleger has promised me that he will not enter into campaigning, will not publicly mention any candidate by name and will abide by the discipline common to all Catholic priests.

http://www.archdiocese-chgo.org/

 

[TR345]

Wait a minute...Obama is all deception, and McCain is a straight talker? I think you are living 8 years in the past. You've got some catching up to do.

Anyway, this is not the thread for this discussion.

Also, you are putting words into my mouth which is a deception. I only said that I have no reason to believe that he is all deception, but he is without doubt at least part deception. When he acts as though he didn't know anything about the church he has gone to for 20 years. It is kind of insulting to our intelligence to play us for fools like that.

Is it not obvious where McCain stands and who he is?

 

[Gokul43201]

Also, you are putting words into my mouth which is a deception.

I put no words in your mouth. I asked you a question. Note the question mark.

Is it not obvious where McCain stands and who he is?

It used to be that way a decade ago. Today, not in the least bit.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioy90nF2anI&feature=related


The McCain you've known exists no more!

PS: Speaking of pandering, we all know which of the three candidates refused the opportunity to engage in some real political season pandering when it came to the idiocy now known as the gas tax holiday.

 

[TR345]

Let me get one thing clear first before I continue, I am not for McCain. I respect McCain in some ways for his open personality. However, it is my belief that McCain is running to be the new "Bush". I don't think it really matters who McCain is anyways because he is running to be the next puppet of certain other powerful people who's practices are in my opinion dishonest, manipulative, abusive to our country, using the white house and the power of the government for personal and corporate benefit etc.

Obama is different because I don't trust his personality, but I at least he probably isn't working for the same people Bush was. That doesn't go to say that there are not others behind the scenes hoping to benefit from his election through means I don't agree with.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

If you know anything about how the US economy was basically built on the backs of black slaves, and the things that happened to them throughout history, its really not all that absurd. In THEORY, yes they should get something. Maybe not money, but edcuation, opportunity, I don't know. But I wouldn't start handing them out cash.

Its pretty convient for us, as white people, to say 'oh you don't get anything', meanwhile we got plenty from their slavery.

Well, perhaps other options might be considered, but we already have acted to help correct inequities in the system; for example through affirmative action, forced bussing, and a slew of civil rights laws.

Bill Cosby and his "give us cash" program were too much to believe. To me, asking for reparations for injustices that occurred at least 150 years ago is completely bogus. In the case of Japanese who were imprisoned in WWII, we were paying to the survivors or their immediate family. But saying that in effect I am liable for actions of people that lived 200 years ago is going too far.

 

[Evo]

Well, perhaps other options might be considered, but we already have acted to help correct inequities in the system; for example through affirmative action, forced bussing, and a slew of civil rights laws.

Bill Cosby and his "give us cash" program were too much to believe. To me, asking for reparations for injustices that occurred at least 150 years ago is completely bogus. In the case of Japanese who were imprisoned in WWII, we were paying to the survivors or their immediate family. But saying that in effect I am liable for actions of people that lived 200 years ago is going too far.

What have we done to repay the American Indians? We stole their lands, killed off many of them, then stuck the survivors on small reservations away from the rest of us "civilised" people.

All through history people have been enslaved and there was never any recompense. It's very likley that every white person here at anyone time in history had familiy members that were caught in battle and enslaved.

 

[drankin]

What have we done to repay the American Indians? We stole their lands, killed off many of them, then stuck the survivors on small reservations away from the rest of us "civilised" people.

All through history people have been enslaved and there was never any recompense. It's very likley that every white person here at anyone time in history had familiy members that were caught in battle and enslaved.

Sure, we came in and took America. That's how everything worked back then. If you were powerful, you conquered to advance your empire.

The Indian people are very much American now. And they get a lot of recompense. Many reservations have taken advantage of the special rights they have and are very wealthy.

The Alaskan natives, were given special corporations to run. http://www.ciri.com/" is a good example. I believe there were 13 originally, some didn't prosper but some did. My two kids are part of CIRI. They have free medical, dental, and secondary education (if they take advantage of it).

So, Evo, you could be guilty of my recent infraction. There was, in fact, recompense.

Here is some good general info on the Alaskan corporations that were formed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Native_Regional_Corporations"

 

[Cyrus]

Sure, we came in and took America. That's how everything worked back then. If you were powerful, you conquered to advance your empire.

The Indian people are very much American now. And they get a lot of recompense. Many reservations have taken advantage of the special rights they have and are very wealthy.

The Alaskan natives, were given special corporations to run. http://www.ciri.com/" is a good example. I believe there were 13 originally, some didn't prosper but some did. My two kids are part of CIRI. They have free medical, dental, and secondary education (if they take advantage of it).

So, Evo, you could be guilty of my recent infraction. There was, in fact, recompense.

Here is some good general info on the Alaskan corporations that were formed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Native_Regional_Corporations"

You're kidding, right? Native americans have one of the highest alcohol/suicide rates of any minority in the USA.

 

[Cyrus]

Well, perhaps other options might be considered, but we already have acted to help correct inequities in the system; for example through affirmative action, forced bussing, and a slew of civil rights laws.

Bill Cosby and his "give us cash" program were too much to believe. To me, asking for reparations for injustices that occurred at least 150 years ago is completely bogus. In the case of Japanese who were imprisoned in WWII, we were paying to the survivors or their immediate family. But saying that in effect I am liable for actions of people that lived 200 years ago is going too far.

Crazy as it sounds, the entire town used to get together and have a party when they were going to lynch somone. After they killed the guy, people took home body parts and put it in jars to show it off to people.

Owning up to what happened in the past 200 years ago going to far?

mmmmmmmmmmmm...I donno.

The things done were so bad that, you kinda do have to own up to them. How, I am not sure.

For startes, Katrina is one example where black people were yet again royally screwed.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

I'm not opposed to owning up to historical facts, but in fact I didn't do anything. Nor did I profit from the slaves on Southern Plantations. My great-grandfather came here from Finland and homesteaded in South Dakota after he pretty much walked there from New York. That was after slavery was abolished. Now, I probably have a few distant family members who killed a few native Americans, but I doubt that my great-grandfather ever saw a black man [less while he was traveling from New York]. My family survived by doing their own manual labor. By chance it was discovered that the Black Hills had gold, but unfortunately none of that came my way.

But don't even get me started on Katrina. That was a disgrace beyond belief.

Also, I don't worry about the Native Americans because I am part Native American - in fact, from two different tribes.

On the other side, German immigrants who about the same time settled in Illinois.

 

[phyzmatix]

All through history people have been enslaved and there was never any recompense. It's very likley that every white person here at anyone time in history had familiy members that were caught in battle and enslaved.

Very true Evo.

If you pursue that line (compensation for past injustices) of reasoning, where does one stop then? Should the Brits, the French, etc start nailing the Italians for what the Roman empire did? Should Russia, China, India (in fact, pretty much all of Asia and a large part of Eastern Europe) start asking for compensation from the Mongolians?

*****ing and moaning about injustices or unfairness in the past (even on a personal level) serves no purpose other than keeping old feuds and hatred alive.

Man, I get so angry about this. That reverend should be grateful that his ancestors were taken to the US as slaves because he has access to all the opportunities and advantages associated with living in a developed country.

There are about 800 million Africans, many of who are facing death through ethnic cleansing, starvation, exposure and disease on a daily basis and pretty much all of who would love to trade places with him if he really feels that an injustice was done to him.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

Would Obama have to pay himself?

 

[Ivan Seeking]

Very true Evo.

If you pursue that line (compensation for past injustices) of reasoning, where does one stop then? Should the Brits, the French, etc start nailing the Italians for what the Roman empire did? Should Russia, China, India (in fact, pretty much all of Asia and a large part of Eastern Europe) start asking for compensation from the Mongolians?

*****ing and moaning about injustices or unfairness in the past (even on a personal level) serves no purpose other than keeping old feuds and hatred alive.

Man, I get so angry about this. That reverend should be grateful that his ancestors were taken to the US as slaves because he has access to all the opportunities and advantages associated with living in a developed country.

There are about 800 million Africans, many of who are facing death through ethnic cleansing, starvation, exposure and disease on a daily basis and pretty much all of who would love to trade places with him if he really feels that an injustice was done to him.

That is a bit of an ends justifies the means argument, but it is hard to dispute the fact that the decendents of many slaves had or have it better here than they would [have] in Africa.

I think it was Eddy Murphy who did a routine about his trip to Africa... or maybe it was Whoopie Goldberg. She talked about how she got all fired-up about being African; the clothes and customs, the music, the food, etc. And then she went to Africa and discovered that in fact, [paraphrasing I'm sure] she is American, not African.

 

[arildno]

Mr. Wright is monomaniacally obsessed with the oppression of blacks.
He is physically incapable of opening his mouth without spurting his hatred.

It is impossible that Mr. Obama haven't heard his views.

Furthermore, in contrast to Muslim countries where you'll get killed if you leave your religion, and hence, many remain attached to it formally, but cannot be charged with collaboration and sympathy, Mr. Obama has no such excuse.

He was perfectly free in joining this church, nobody pressured him unduly in remaining there, nobody censored him from criticizing the oipinions of Mr. Wright, and hence, Mr. Obama retains full personal responsibility for having CHOSEN to remain a member in this loathsome congregation.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

Obama's involvement with this church came about because of their community outreach programs. It is also apparently one of the most prominent black churches in Chicago.

If there was any way to peg Obama as a black radical, you might have a point, but truthfully that is laughable. And I seriously doubt that anyone will be able to make that allegation stick. No closet Rev Wright could stand the scrutiny of a Presidential election campaign. And liberation theology is a historical fact of many black cultures in the US. The key is that Obama does not lay claim to these principles - the time for that sort of rhetoric has passed. This is not a new thing like religious based neo-conservatism and evangelical political activism, it is a relic from the past.

 

[TR345]

Reparations wouldn't be a bad idea if money could be traced back to profits made on the backs of slaves ie. Rich families that have inherited very large amounts of money from big time slave owners and corporations. I don't think it would be fair to take any money away from anyone who earned it legitimately. If slave money can be traced and records can prove it and minimum wage plus interest per slave, and if all can't be paid, then all inherited slave money and corporate profits could be liquidated. That is fair right, it would never happen though, we would have a new civil war before that happens.

 

[Art]

What makes the issue of black slavery different to the slavery practised on other race is IMO because many African-American's still have a strong sense of current injustices which fuels their anger over past injustices.

Unfortunately them living with a victim mentality perpetuates the problem as it is one of the factors preventing them from fully integrating into US society. It is this problem of being on the outside looking in that needs to be addressed as it seems deeply rooted on both sides of the debate. I have seen some right wing TV talkshow hosts tell their black guests' if they don't like it why don't they go back to Africa'. It is hard to think of a situation where a white guest whose ancestors moved to America a couple of hundred years ago would be told to 'go back' to wherever for criticising the US. It is that term 'go back' which shows how some Americans still do not consider African Americans (at least those who complain) as being as American as them.

On the other hand the idea of recompense is a non-starter for the reasons others such as Evo have already espoused in this thread.

I think people such as the Rev Wright are part of the problem rather than part of the solution and do the black community a huge disservice by telling them they are not responsible for their own shortcomings. Sure tell them how bad things used to be, history is important, but this should be tempered with a message of hope. That in the US today blacks can do as well as any other race and it is up to each individual to work hard to achieve their goal.

Whether Rev Wright is well intentioned albeit misguided and actually believes his own message is debatable. From what I have seen of his personal wealth I suspect he is cynically living his American dream off the backs of the blacks he claims to care so much about. If this is the case his exploitation is no better than the exploitation by the white slave owners he complains so much about.

 

[AhmedEzz]

Do you think Clinton still has a chance? maybe benefit from this bad media for Obama?

 

[Jimmy Snyder]

Do you think Clinton still has a chance? maybe benefit from this bad media for Obama?

No.

Text added to satisfy a curious criterion.

 

[Evo]

The Indian people are very much American now. And they get a lot of recompense. Many reservations have taken advantage of the special rights they have and are very wealthy.

I guess you haven't read much about the horrible poverty of American Indians?

Poorest of poor, American Indians

'Deplorable' conditions

According to statistics from the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Indian Affairs, there are 1.43 million Indians living on or near reservations. Roughly 33 percent of them are children younger than 15, and 38 percent of Indian children aged 6 to 11 live in poverty, compared with 18 percent for U.S. children of all other races combined.

Only 63 percent of Indians are high school graduates. Twenty-nine percent are homeless, and 59 percent live in substandard housing.

Twenty percent of Indian households on reservations do not have full access to plumbing, and the majority -- 53.4 percent -- do not have telephones.

An estimated 50 percent of American Indians are unemployed, and at Pine Ridge the problem is even more chronic -- 73 percent of the people do not have jobs.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/07/07/clinton.tour/

 

[phyzmatix]

That is a bit of an ends justifies the means argument...

I hope my argument didn't come across as if I was supporting/trying to justify the atrocities committed during slavery since that definitely wasn't my intent. Apologies if my post can be interpreted as such.

I think people such as the Rev Wright are part of the problem rather than part of the solution and do the black community a huge disservice by telling them they are not responsible for their own shortcomings. Sure tell them how bad things used to be, history is important, but this should be tempered with a message of hope. That in the US today blacks can do as well as any other race and it is up to each individual to work hard to achieve their goal.

Whether Rev Wright is well intentioned albeit misguided and actually believes his own message is debatable. From what I have seen of his personal wealth I suspect he is cynically living his American dream off the backs of the blacks he claims to care so much about. If this is the case his exploitation is no better than the exploitation by the white slave owners he complains so much about.

That is very well put Art and is pretty much the same problem we have here on my side of the water as well.

 

[Benzoate]

Screaming to a group of black people that they have been repeatedly raped by American Whites? That's not hate mongering? Of I'm sure that did a lot of good to help smooth over racial tensions. And there were small children listening to him, what are they supposed to think? He's telling the congregation, throughout his sermon that white people are against blacks. Did you see the snippet of him praising Rev Wright, again evil White people are against them.

This is why Obama had to leave, not the parody of Clinton.

I went to a black church where our preacher would often mixed politics with religion. Our church even had guest preachers who explicit refer to whites as 'devils' and refer them as a clueless group of people who did not understand the "plight black americans face". But , like most of the members of my church , I never swallowed everything the pastor spout out at our congregation. Most of the members accepted the flaws of our preacher(, he squander the church's money, putting our church in $700,000 worth of debt, he was a womanizer,he cheated on his wife, and so many other unimaginable things). However, my church did not have a strong influence on the beliefs I hold as an adult today. In fact , I no longer consider myself a christian for reasons independent of my church.

As a result, my preachers politics did not have any affect on what I believe today. Come to think of it, I never learned anything from my pastor; When I was somewhat of a christian fanatic back in the day, I always followed the teachings of the bible more so than the teachings of my pastor

 

[Benzoate]

Very true Evo.

If you pursue that line (compensation for past injustices) of reasoning, where does one stop then? Should the Brits, the French, etc start nailing the Italians for what the Roman empire did? Should Russia, China, India (in fact, pretty much all of Asia and a large part of Eastern Europe) start asking for compensation from the Mongolians?

*****ing and moaning about injustices or unfairness in the past (even on a personal level) serves no purpose other than keeping old feuds and hatred alive.

Man, I get so angry about this. That reverend should be grateful that his ancestors were taken to the US as slaves because he has access to all the opportunities and advantages associated with living in a developed country.

There are about 800 million Africans, many of who are facing death through ethnic cleansing, starvation, exposure and disease on a daily basis and pretty much all of who would love to trade places with him if he really feels that an injustice was done to him.

I guess one could also make the argument, if not for Western Civilization strong opposition to slavery in the mid 1800's and European imperialism, slavery would still be very common in many parts of the world. At the time westerners were starting to oppose slavery, their were many cultures who strongly wanted to preserved the institution of slavery.

Yes, slavery shouldn't be perceived as being exclusively practiced by whites. It is an institution all cultures are guilty of.

 

[quadraphonics]

I guess one could also make the argument, if not for Western Civilization strong opposition to slavery in the mid 1800's and European imperialism, slavery would still be very common in many parts of the world.

Slavery *is* still very common in many parts of the world. There are more people in slavery today than at any point in human history. This includes the West, which, by virtue of its high level of development, is the world's most lucrative market for sex slaves.

 

[Benzoate]

Slavery *is* still very common in many parts of the world. There are more people in slavery today than at any point in human history. This includes the West, which, by virtue of its high level of development, is the world's most lucrative market for sex slaves.

You are right. There are more slaves today than their were 500 years ago. But the reason why there are more slaves now than in previous years, is simply because the human population has grown exponential. According to centerforglobal education , there are estimitated to be around 12 million slaves in the world. But, 12 million out of 6 billion people hardly constitutes as the norm.

 

[AhmedEzz]

ere are more slaves today than their were 500 years ago

I don't know but I'm not entirely convinced.

there are estimitated to be around 12 million slaves in the world

12 million slaves? that's shocking...do u have a credible source?

Yes, slavery shouldn't be perceived as being exclusively practiced by whites. It is an institution all cultures are guilty of.

I couldn't agree more. What really saddens me is that Islam banns any kind of slavery yet we find it present in some areas in Yemen, Saudi-Arabia, the Gulf and some other areas. It really makes me sad, some people in those countries have truly **** heads.

 

[quadraphonics]

You are right. There are more slaves today than their were 500 years ago. But the reason why there are more slaves now than in previous years, is simply because the human population has grown exponential. According to centerforglobal education , there are estimitated to be around 12 million slaves in the world. But, 12 million out of 6 billion people hardly constitutes as the norm.

The number I've seen quoted most often is 27 Million slaves in the present world, although there are other estimates that range much much higher than that. But it is also true that this represents the smallest portion of the human population that has ever been enslaved, even while it is the largest absolute number of slaves.

 

[AhmedEzz]

27 millions? really?

 

[TVP45]

Very true Evo.


That reverend should be grateful that his ancestors were taken to the US as slaves because he has access to all the opportunities and advantages associated with living in a developed country.

.

Surely you're being ironic and I'm not getting it??

 

[quadraphonics]

27 millions? really?

That's what Wikipedia says anyway. Interestingly, slaves are today much, much cheaper to buy than they were back in the days of chattel slavery (after adjusting for inflation, of course). Seems like there's a new horror story about some underground child slaves in China every week these days, and of course the various conflicts in Africa end up producing countless slaves. And then there's the sex slave trade, which is huge all over the world.

 

[AhmedEzz]

I got to open my mind up more.

 

[drankin]

I guess you haven't read much about the horrible poverty of American Indians?



http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/07/07/clinton.tour/

I'm not arguing the state of a lot of Indians, I'm arguing that there has been recompense, after you said there has not been.

I've worked for a native foundation run by native americans, I've married a native american woman, I have native american children. You can't tell me anything I haven't already seen with my own eyes.

To say there has not been recompense is simply wrong!

 

[Evo]

I'm not arguing the state of a lot of Indians, I'm arguing that there has been recompense, after you said there has not been.

I've worked for a native foundation run by native americans, I've married a native american woman, I have native american children. You can't tell me anything I haven't already seen with my own eyes.

To say there has not been recompense is simply wrong!

We took everything and gave them virtualy nothing, that is not recompense.

 

[mheslep]

That is a bit of an ends justifies the means argument, but it is hard to dispute the fact that the decendents of many slaves had or have it better here than they would [have] in Africa.

I think it was Eddy Murphy who did a routine about his trip to Africa... or maybe it was Whoopie Goldberg. She talked about how she got all fired-up about being African; the clothes and customs, the music, the food, etc. And then she went to Africa and discovered that in fact, [paraphrasing I'm sure] she is American, not African.

Pretty sure that was Tina Turner.

 

[TR345]

We took everything and gave them virtualy nothing, that is not recompense.

They do get some recompense, they get free housing and other money for living etc. In the reservation at the town I live in, many are on a waiting list for their free houses though. My sisters ex boyfriend used to get large checks from his tribe, and now they get money from the casinos too.

The problem I see with the way that Native Americans get compensated is that it in a way keeps them down. They get free housing at the reservation which keeps them in the reservation, and they get enough money to live without a job. The reservation here is full of problems like drugs, gang mentality, lack of education, and too much drinking. I kind of feel they would be better off without the compensation so that they would be forced to make something of themselves and get educated so that they don't just hang around doing drugs and drinking.

Not saying they shouldn't get anything though. It wouldn't be right to force them to integrate. If I was a Native American, I wouldn't want to learn history from the government who raped my people and country. They say that in war, the winners write the history books.

 

[drankin]

They do get some recompense, they get free housing and other money for living etc. In the reservation at the town I live in, many are on a waiting list for their free houses though. My sisters ex boyfriend used to get large checks from his tribe, and now they get money from the casinos too.

The problem I see with the way that Native Americans get compensated is that it in a way keeps them down. They get free housing at the reservation which keeps them in the reservation, and they get enough money to live without a job. The reservation here is full of problems like drugs, gang mentality, lack of education, and too much drinking. I kind of feel they would be better off without the compensation so that they would be forced to make something of themselves and get educated so that they don't just hang around doing drugs and drinking.

Not saying they shouldn't get anything though. It wouldn't be right to force them to integrate. If I was a Native American, I wouldn't want to learn history from the government who raped my people and country. They say that in war, the winners write the history books.

There's a lot of truth in that. When you see them getting thousands of dollars a year and sometimes huge bulk monies (ex-wife got $100,000 one year) without earning it, it's hard for many of them to appreciate it. Some do, and make good use of it but many just squander it. Literally live on the streets, get their checks and drink them away. I've seen a lot of it. If I didn't have to work so hard to make a living, free money, free houses, free medical and dental, wouldn't mean so much to me either. Those that make use of it get a great advantage in life. Evo, when you see thousands of native Americans get checks for $100,000 in a single year just because, it's hard to say they don't get "recompense".

 

[AhmedEzz]

I saw on the news the other day how Native Americans are living. and I still can't believe that in the United States- the world's superpower- people live like that. Some don't even have running water, unemployment rates in the sky, poverty, under-education...I think that solving those issues is better than giving drunk people cheques.

 

[drankin]

I saw on the news the other day how Native Americans are living. and I still can't believe that in the United States- the world's superpower- people live like that. Some don't even have running water, unemployment rates in the sky, poverty, under-education...I think that solving those issues is better than giving drunk people cheques.

Would you care to give the US some ideas on "solving those issues"? Otherwise, what you are saying is just an unconstructive complaint.

"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink"

The Native American people have even more opportunities available to them than the average US citizen.

 

[Astronuc]

Some compensation is relatively recent, and not all Native American tribes have casinos. Not all states allow Indian gambling, and some tribes have been cheated by people like Jack Abramov.

Over the past two decades, it was revealed that the Dept of Interior mismanaged records and royalties.

Look at the folks on Pine Ridge.

The Native American people have even more opportunities available to them than the average US citizen.

That perhaps is true for some. But then none can enjoy the freedom in their own country in the land of their ancestors.


There definitely has to be a better way of improving the condition of those Native Americans who have been left out.


And what the disposition of Native Americans has to do with "Obama quitting Chicago [Trinity United] church" eludes me. Perhaps the posts on Native Americans could be split into their own thread.

 

[drankin]

Some compensation is relatively recent, and not all Native American tribes have casinos. Not all states allow Indian gambling, and some tribes have been cheated by people like Jack Abramov.

Over the past two decades, it was revealed that the Dept of Interior mismanaged records and royalties.

Look at the folks on Pine Ridge.


That perhaps is true for some. But then none can enjoy the freedom in their own country in the land of their ancestors.


There definitely has to be a better way of improving the condition of those Native Americans who have been left out.


And what the disposition of Native Americans has to do with "Obama quitting Chicago [Trinity United] church" eludes me. Perhaps the posts on Native Americans could be split into their own thread.

This is a good topic, I'll start a thread.

 

[quadraphonics]

But then none can enjoy the freedom in their own country in the land of their ancestors.

This is true of every person in America.

 

[TR345]

The thing that I find unfair about the recompense given to them, at least in this town, is that the reservation isn't a huge chunk of land. It is a small town here, and most people own at least a couple acres, many people own large parcels, and then there is the Rez. which is like a little suburb with houses right next to each other, sidewalks and stuff. They deserve more land, so that they have more room to build and stuff. At the Rez, they play catch on the street, at my house, I play catch in my yard. Something is wrong when the native americans in a community are living more like city people than the foreigners.

Giving them incentives to stay there on their little suburb which has a huge unemployment rate, and it turns into something you would see in the inner city with gangs and drugs/drug money etc.

 

[NeoDevin]

There is nothing preventing them from purchasing more than they are given on the Rez. It is, in the end, their own decision to remain in such conditions. In Canada, we have similar problems with many of the reservations. Most of the natives I've known who were (what I would call) successful in life (ie. no excessive use of drugs and/or alcohol and/or gambling), moved away from the reservations as soon as they could, and never looked back. Due to the gangs/drugs/generally bad influences common on many of the reservations, it is very difficult for a person living there to come out ahead.

 

[TR345]

Also, there is basically no law enforcement there, although they do have their own private security guards. One of the last times I was there, some kids were lighting a car on fire using gasoline.